Skip to main content

The Role of Social Ideologies in Legitimizing Political Attitudes and Public Policy

  • Chapter
The Social Psychology of Politics

Abstract

In democracies, citizens are supposed to be free to decide what laws and institutional practices they believe are right, and to enact those beliefs through political influence. In such a context, it makes sense for researchers to ask why people support the politicians, political parties, and policies that they do (e.g., Himmelweit, Humphreys, & Jaeger, 1985), how cultural context influences people’s political preferences (e.g., Schwartz & Bardi, 1997), and to identify the political consequences of political attitudes (e.g., Rokeach, 1973). As Skitka and Mullen’s (this volume) review shows, many basic psychological processes influence people’s political attitudes. Political psychology must also consider the political implications and cultural meaning of political attitudes because (1) Political psychology must address politics: power relations between people and (2) Cultural context influences individuals’ attitudes (e.g., Pettigrew, 1958; Schwartz & Bardi, 1997). By examining the political meaning of political attitudes both to individuals and for their society, we will show how individual-level and societal-level processes influence each other. We first describe approaches to why people hold political attitudes and consequences of such attitudes. This review illuminates methodological difficulties and important empirical patterns. We then explicate social dominance theory’s analysis of ideologies as legitimizing political attitudes and social policies, and discuss the political and cultural implications of this analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. NY: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. Manitoba: University of Manitoba Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altemeyer, B. (1988). Enemies of freedom: Understanding right-wing authoritarianism. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altemeyer, B. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altemeyer, B. (1998). The other authoritarian personality. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 48–92). NY: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnea, M. F. & Schwartz, S. H. (1998). Values and voting. Political Psychology, 19, 17–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilsky, W. & Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Values and personality. European Journal of Personality, 8, 163–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, V. A. & Law, H. G. (1985). The structure of human values: Testing the adequacy of the Rokeach value survey. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 250–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, V. A. (1994). Beyond Rokeach’s equality-freedom model: Two dimensional values in a one-dimensional world. Journal of Social Issues, 50, 67–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christie, R. & Cook, P. (1958). A guide to published literature relating to the authoritarian personality through 1956. Journal of Psychology, 45, 1717–1799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, R., Billig, M., & Hogg, M. (1979). British politics and the two-value model. In M. Rokeach (Ed.), Understanding human values, (pp. 179–191). NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duckitt, J. (1993). Right-wing authoritarianism among White South African students: Its measurement and correlates. Journal of Social Psychology, 133, 553–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duckitt, J. (2000). Culture, personality, and prejudice. In S. Renshon & J. Duckitt (Eds.), Political psychology: Cultural and Cross-cultural foundations (pp. 89–107). London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckhardt, W. (1991). Authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 12, 97–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H. J. (1955). The psychology of politics. NY: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromm, E. (1941). Escape from freedom. NY: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., Deibold, J., Bailey-Werner, B., & Zhu, L. (1997). The two faces of Adam: Ambivalent sexism and polarized attitudes toward women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1323–1334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haddock, G., Zanna, M. P., & Esses, V. M. (1993). Assessing the structure of prejudicial attitudes: The case of attitudes toward homosexuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1105–1118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heaven, P. C. L. (1991). Voting intention and the two-value model: A further investigation. Australian Journal of Psychology, 43, 15–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Himmelweit, H. T., Humphreys, P., & Jaeger, M. (1985). How voters decide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerlinger, F. N. (1984). Liberalism and conservatism: The nature and structure of social attitudes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenski, G. E. (1984). Power and privilege: A theory of social stratification. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lentz, T. F. (1929). Character and human happiness. Association Forum, 10, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lentz, T. F. (1935). C-R Opinionaire and Manual. St. Louis: Character Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClosky, H. (1958). Conservatism and personality. American Political Science Review, 53, 27–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFarland, S. G. & Adelson, S. (1996). An omnibus study of personality, values and prejudices. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the International Society for Political Psychology, Vancouver, British Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, M. & Sidanius, J. (1995). Social hierarchy and the death penalty: A social dominance perspective. Political Psychology, 16, 591–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murdock, G. (1956). Social structure. NY: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, T. E. & Kinder, D. R. (1996). Issue frames and group-centrism in American public opinion. Journal of Politics, 58, 1055–1078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, B. E., Doty, R. M., & Winter, D. G. (1993). Authoritarianism and attitudes towards contemporary social issues. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 174–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T. F. (1958). Personality and sociocultural factors in intergroup attitudes: A cross-national comparison. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2, 29–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T. (1999). Placing authoritarianism in social context. Politics, groups, and the individual, 8, 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratto, F. (1999). The puzzle of continuing group inequality: Piecing together psychological, social, and cultural forces in social dominance theory. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 31, (pp. 191–263). NY: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratto, F., Cathey, C., Loftus, J., & Stallworth, L. M. (2001). What does it all mean? Message framing and social dominance orientation in policy persuasion. Unpublished manuscript, University of Connecticut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratto, F., Liu, J. H., Levin, S., Sidanius, J., Shih, M., Bachrach, H., & Hegarty, P. (2000). Social dominance orientation and the legitimization of inequality across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 369–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratto, F., Stallworth, L. M., & Conway-Lanz, C. (1998). Social dominance orientation and the ideological legitimization of social policy. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 1853–1875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratto, F., Stallworth, L. M., & Sidanius, J. (1997). The gender gap: Differences in political attitudes and social dominance orientation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 49–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pratto, E, Stallworth, L., Sidanius, J., & Siers, B. (1997). The gender gap in occupational role attainment: A social dominance approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 37–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pratto, F., Tatar, D. G., & Conway-Lanz, S. (1999). Who gets what and why: Determinants of social allocations. Political Psychology, 20, 127–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray, J. J. (1973). Conservatism, authoritarianism, and related variables: A review and an empirical study. In G. D. Wilson (Ed.), The psychology of conservatism (pp. 17–35). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reardon, D. C. (1996). Making abortion rare. Springfield, IL: Acorn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokeach, M. (1960). The open and closed mind. NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1–65. NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. & Bardi, A. (1997). Influences of adaptation to communist rule on value priorities in Eastern Europe. Political Psychology, 18, 385–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searing, D. D. (1979). A study of values in the British House of Commons. In M. Rokeach (Ed.), Understanding human values (pp. 154–178). NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shils, E. A. (1954). Authoritarianism: “Right” and “left.” In R. Christie & M. Jahoda (Eds.), Studies in the scope and method of “The authoritarian personality.” Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidanius, J., Devereux, E., & Pratto, F. (1992). A comparison of symbolic racism theory and social dominance theory: Explanations for racial policy attitudes. Journal of Social Psychology, 132, 377–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidanius, J. & Ekehammar, B. (1979). Political socialization: A multivariate analysis of Swedish political attitude and preference data. European Journal of Social Psychology, 9, 265–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidanius, J. & Ekehammar, B. (1980). Sex-related differences in socio-political ideology. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 21, 17–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidanius, J., Levin, S., Liu, J., & Pratto, F. (2000). Social dominance orientation, anti-egalitarianism and the political psychology of gender: An extension and cross-cultural replication. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 41–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidanius, J., Liu, J., Pratto, R, & Shaw, J. (1994). Social dominance orientation, hierarchy-attenuators and hierarchy-enhancers: Social dominance theory and the criminal justice system. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 338–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidanius, J. & Pratto, R (1993a). The dynamics of social dominance and the inevitability of oppression. In P. Sniderman, P. E. Tetlock, & E. G. Carmines (Eds.), Prejudice, politics, and race in America today (pp. 173–211). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidanius, J. & Pratto, R (1993b). Racism and support for free-market analysis: A cross-cultural analysis. Political Psychology, 14, 383–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidanius, J. & Pratto, R. (1999). Social dominance. NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sidanius, J., Pratto, R., & Bobo, L. (1994). Social dominance orientation and the political psychology of gender: A case of invariance? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 998–1011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidanius, J., Pratto, R., & Bobo, L. (1996). Racism, conservatism, affirmative action, and intellectual sophistication: A matter of principled conservatism or group dominance? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 476–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skitka, L. H. & Tetlock, P. E. (1992). Allocating scarce resources: A contingency model of distributive justice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 491–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skitka, L. J. & Tetlock, P. E. (1993). Providing public assistance: Cognitive and motivational processes underlying liberal and conservative policy preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1205–1223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, W. F. (1980). The myth of left-wing authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 2, 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, W. F. & Smith, L. D. (1993). Authoritarianism: Left and right. In W. F. Stone, G. Lederer, & R. Christie (Eds.), Strengths and weaknesses: The authoritarian personality today (pp. 144–156). NY: Springer-Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thannhauser, D. & Caird, D. (1990). Politics and values in Australia: Testing Rokeach’s two-value model of politics. Australian Journal of Psychology, 42, 57–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tompkins, S. (1963). Left and right: A basic dimension of ideology and personality. In R. W. White (Ed.), The study of lives (pp. 388–411). NY: Atherton.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk, T. A. (1987). Communicating racism: Ethnic prejudice in thought and talk. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk, T. A. (1988). News analysis: Case studies of international and national news in the press. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetherell, M. & Potter, J. (1993). Mapping the language of racism: Discourse and the legitimation of exploitation. NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiting, B. B. & Whiting, J. W. M. (1975). Children of six cultures. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, B. E. (1999). Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 126–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, G. D. (1973). The psychology of conservatism. San Diego, CA: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, G. D. & Patterson, J. R. (1968). A new measure of conservatism. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 7, 264–269.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zick, A. (1999). Preface. Politics, Groups and the Individual, 8, 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zick, A. & Petzel, T. (1999). Authoritarianism, racism, and ideologies about acculturation. Politics, Groups and the Individual, 8, 41–64.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pratto, F., Cathey, C. (2002). The Role of Social Ideologies in Legitimizing Political Attitudes and Public Policy. In: Ottati, V.C., et al. The Social Psychology of Politics. Social Psychological Applications to Social Issues. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0569-3_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0569-3_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5136-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0569-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics