Abstract
Fertilization—the fusion of gametes to produce a new organism—is the culmination of a multitude of intricately regulated cellular processes. In Caenorhabditis elegans, fertilization is highly efficient. Sperm become fertilization competent after undergoing a maturation process during which they become motile, and the plasma membrane protein composition is reorganized in preparation for interaction with the oocyte. The highly specialized gametes begin their interactions by signaling to one another to ensure that fertilization occurs when they meet. The oocyte releases prostaglandin signals to help guide the sperm to the site of fertilization, and sperm secrete a protein called major sperm protein (MSP) to trigger oocyte maturation and ovulation. Upon meeting one another in the spermatheca, the sperm and oocyte fuse in a specific and tightly regulated process. Recent studies are providing new insights into the molecular basis of this fusion process. After fertilization, the oocyte must quickly transition from the relative quiescence of oogenesis to a phase of rapid development during the cleavage divisions of early embryogenesis. In addition, the fertilized oocyte must prevent other sperm from fusing with it as well as produce an eggshell for protection during external development. This chapter will review the nature and regulation of the various cellular processes of fertilization, including the development of fertilization competence, gamete signaling, sperm–oocyte fusion, the oocyte to embryo transition, and production of an eggshell to protect the developing embryo.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Fertilization
- Oocyte-to-embryo transition
- Egg activation
- Spermiogenesis
- Sperm activation
- Eggshell
- Polyspermy
- Sperm migration
- PUFA-derived signals
- Major sperm protein (MSP)
11.1 Overview of Fertilization in Caenorhabditis elegans
Fertilization is the central molecular process of sexual reproduction. Despite this, the cellular and molecular mechanisms that govern sperm–egg fusion are not well understood. C. elegans serves as an excellent model system for dissecting the molecular and genetic processes of fertilization, as well as those that prepare the gametes for fertilization and ensure proper embryogenesis. Importantly, fertilization in C. elegans shares many characteristics with fertilization in other species, including mammals. In both C. elegans and mammalian fertilization, sperm activation occurs within the reproductive tract, fertilization occurs internally, and egg activation includes a polyspermy block, cortical granule exocytosis, meiotic resumption, and the activation and degradation of selected maternal mRNAs and proteins (Singson et al. 2008; Horner and Wolfner 2008; Marcello and Singson 2010; Stitzel and Seydoux 2007).
C. elegans has two sexes: hermaphrodite and male (Nigon and Dougherty 1949; Madl and Herman 1979). Hermaphrodite C. elegans are essentially females that produce and store sperm early in their life cycle before producing oocytes (Ward and Carrel 1979; Hirsh et al. 1976). Hermaphrodites produce approximately 100–175 immature sperm, or spermatids, per gonad arm during the final larval stage (L4) and then switch strictly to oogenesis for the remainder of their life (see Chap. 3, Zanetti and Puoti 2012; Ward and Carrel 1979; Hirsh et al. 1976).
Male-derived sperm are introduced to the hermaphrodite reproductive tract through the uterus during copulation (L’Hernault 2006; Stanfield and Villeneuve 2006). Immature sperm, or spermatids, are stored in the seminal vesicle of males and undergo a final maturation process, called sperm activation or spermiogenesis, as they are ejaculated into the hermaphrodite (Hirsh et al. 1976; Klass et al. 1976; Kimble and Hirsh 1979; Shakes and Ward 1989). During sperm activation, the spermatids mature to a motile, amoeboid sperm capable of fertilizing the oocyte (see Chap. 7, Chu and Shakes 2012). Both the sperm and oocyte send signals to increase the efficiency of fertilization. Oocytes release polyunsaturated fatty acid-derived signals to attract sperm to the oocytes and sperm then migrate to the spermatheca, the site of fertilization (Fig. 11.1) (Kubagawa et al. 2006). C. elegans sperm do not contain any actin and instead employ another cytoskeletal protein, major sperm protein (MSP), to mediate motility (Roberts and Ward 1982). In addition to serving as the cytoskeletal protein that is responsible for sperm locomotion, MSP is also released from the sperm and stimulates meiotic maturation and ovulation of the oocyte into the spermatheca (Miller et al. 2001).
Fertilization triggers a number of rapid changes in the oocyte. The first detectable change in the oocyte after fertilization is an increase in intracellular calcium (Samuel et al. 2001). The oocyte then forms an actin-rich cap over the site of fertilization, completes meiosis, extrudes an eggshell, and initiates embryonic development (Parry et al. 2009; Maruyama et al. 2007). If the oocyte-to-embryo transition occurs normally, the embryo will divide in the uterus until approximately the 30-cell stage and then will be laid out of the vulva (egg-laying) (Hirsh et al. 1976).
Hermaphrodites are able to self-fertilize when males are not present in the population (L’Hernault 2006; Ward and Carrel 1979; Hirsh et al. 1976). The hermaphrodite-derived spermatids that are produced during L4 are stored in the proximal gonad and are also pushed into the spermatheca when the first oocytes are ovulated (McCarter et al. 1999; Singson 2001). In contrast to sperm activation of male-derived sperm, hermaphrodite-derived spermatids undergo sperm activation when they are deposited into the spermatheca (L’Hernault 2006). Fertilization in C. elegans is very efficient and almost all of the hermaphrodite-derived sperm fertilize the egg (Singson 2001).
If both male- and hermaphrodite-derived sperm are present in the spermatheca, the male-derived sperm are competitively superior to hermaphrodite-derived sperm and will preferentially fertilize the oocytes (L’Hernault 2006; Ward and Carrel 1979). It is not completely understood how male-derived sperm outcompete hermaphrodite-derived sperm (LaMunyon and Ward 1998). One hypothesis is that male-derived sperm are larger than hermaphrodite-derived sperm because of the differences in the physiological environment of male gonad; this size difference may aid in gaining access to the oocytes (Baldi et al. 2011; LaMunyon and Ward 1998). Interestingly, males preferentially mate with older hermaphrodites that have depleted their own sperm populations, and it is hypothesized that hermaphrodites produce a mating cue that attracts males when no activated sperm are present (Morsci et al. 2011).
The experimental techniques available to study the multitude of cellular processes that occur during fertilization in C. elegans make it an attractive model system (see Geldziler et al. 2011 for an extensive review of techniques). The most widely used method for understanding the mechanism of fertilization in C. elegans is genetic analysis (Geldziler et al. 2011). Forward genetic screens for fertility mutants in C. elegans are very powerful because it is relatively easy to isolate mutations in sperm-specific genes, and mutants can be isolated that have defects only in fertilization and/or egg activation, not spermatogenesis, spermiogenesis, or oogenesis (L’Hernault et al. 1988; Singson et al. 1998). RNAi has been helpful in identifying genes in the oocyte that are necessary for fertilization (Geldziler et al. 2004). However, many questions still remain about molecular basis of C. elegans fertilization. This chapter will outline the current status of the field of fertilization C. elegans and provide some perspective on the future directions of the field.
11.2 Preparing Sperm for Interaction with the Oocyte
11.2.1 Sperm Activation
C. elegans sperm must undergo a final maturation process, called sperm activation (spermiogenesis), to be fertilization competent. Sperm activation is a rapid post-meiotic differentiation that converts round immotile spermatids into mature amoeboid sperm (see Chap. 7, Chu and Shakes 2012; Shakes and Ward 1989) (Fig. 11.2). Hermaphrodite-derived spermatids undergo sperm activation when they are pushed into the spermatheca during the first ovulations and male-derived spermatids undergo sperm activation when they mix with the seminal fluid during ejaculation (L’Hernault 2006; Stanfield and Villeneuve 2006). Regardless of the origin of the sperm, two events take place that are critical to render the sperm fertilization competent: (1) membranous organelles (MO), which are specialized secretory vesicles derived from the Golgi, must fuse with the plasma membrane to release their glycoprotein contents and add critical transmembrane proteins to the sperm plasma membrane, and (2) sperm must gain the ability to crawl by extending a pseudopod from one side of the cell body (Fig. 11.2) (Shakes and Ward 1989; Roberts and Streitmatter 1984; Roberts and Ward 1982). Sperm activation (spermiogenesis) is covered extensively in Chap. 7 by D.S. Chu and D.C. Shakes. This chapter will focus on the mechanisms of sperm locomotion that are necessary for sperm to fertilize the ovulated oocyte in the spermatheca.
11.2.2 MSP Polymerization and Sperm Motility
Sperm motility is crucial for sperm to reach and fertilize the oocyte. The movement of the amoeboid sperm is made possible by a protrusion at its leading edge, adhesion to the substrate, and retraction near the cell body (Shimabukuro et al. 2011). Sperm from C. elegans and other nematodes accomplish this without actin or motor proteins (Roberts and Stewart 2000). Instead, nematodes employ an MSP-based motility system (King et al. 1994). In addition to signaling oocyte meiotic maturation and ovulation, MSP is also the structural component responsible for sperm movement (King et al. 1994; Smith 2006). MSP accounts for more than 40% of the cytosolic protein in nematode sperm (Smith 2006).
To better understand the mechanism of the MSP-based motility of nematode sperm, many studies were performed using the parasitic nematode Ascaris suum (Italiano et al. 2001). A. suum sperm are large and easy to isolate in large numbers, which is advantageous for imaging and allows for more convenient protein purification and biochemical analyses (L’Hernault and Roberts 1995). Moreover, the development of a cell-free filament assembly system from A. suum lysate has allowed for the reconstitution of purified motility factors in vitro (Italiano et al. 1996).
The three-dimensional structure of C. elegans MSP is very similar to that of A. suum MSP (Baker et al. 2002). X-ray crystallography and NMR have shown that MSP folds into a seven-stranded beta sandwich that resembles an immunoglobulin-like fold (Bullock et al. 1996a, b; Haaf et al. 1996). MSP monomers self-assemble to form dimers (Haaf et al. 1996). The MSP dimers are then polymerized to form helical subfilaments that are ultimately assembled into larger fibers (Haaf et al. 1996). In A. suum the movement of the pseudopod is ATP dependent and is accomplished by the continual assembly of bundles of MSP filaments at the leading edge and concurrent disassembly of the filaments near the cell body (Miao et al. 2003).
Assembly of the MSP fibers at the leading edge is mediated by a crucial membrane protein and multiple phosphorylation events. A critical protein in MSP nucleation and assembly is MSP polymerization organizing protein (MPOP), a 48 kDa protein present on the inner leaflet of the plasma membrane (LeClaire et al. 2003). MPOP is selectively phosphorylated by an unknown tyrosine kinase at the leading edge, after which phospho-MPOP recruits MSP polymerization-activation kinase (MPAK) to the leading edge of the pseudopod, where MPAK then phosphorylates MFP2 (MSP fiber protein 2) (Yi et al. 2007). The phosphorylated form of MFP2 is present on the MSP fiber complexes in sperm and in the reconstituted MSP fibers in vitro (Buttery et al. 2003). MFP2 is thought to increase the rate of fiber formation by cross-linking MSP filaments or recruiting other proteins required for filament formation (Buttery et al. 2003; Grant et al. 2005). Together, these proteins regulate MSP assembly at the leading edge and are necessary for the pseudopod protrusions.
The disassembly of MSP filaments is as important as assembly in regulating pseudopod movement and is regulated by a putative protein phosphatase 2A homolog known as PP2A (Yi et al. 2009). PP2A is localized near the cell body, which is the site of MSP depolymerization, and when PP2A is activated, it promotes the retraction of the MSP fiber (Yi et al. 2009). One of the substrates of PP2A is MFP3 (MSP fiber protein 3), which in its phosphorylated form binds with MSP filaments and stabilizes it (Yi et al. 2009). The dephosphorylation of MFP3 by PP2A causes MFP3 to detach from the MSP bundles, which causes the destabilization and depolymerization of MSP fibers (Yi et al. 2009). MFP1 (MSP fiber protein 1) also negatively regulates the elongation of MSP fibers in vitro but its relationship with PP2A and MFP3 is unknown (Buttery et al. 2003). The depolymerization of the MSP fibers is crucial for the forward movement of the cell body and amoeboid movement of sperm. Disassembly of MSP fibers leads to a gradual decrease in the optical density of filaments. Depolymerizing the MSP network produces sufficient force to propel the pseudopod (Shimabukuro et al. 2011).
An increasing number of studies have focused on understanding MSP dynamics in C. elegans. Batchelder et al. found that membrane tension plays an important role in motility, and they postulate that increasing membrane tension in the direction of movement streamlines MSP polymerization and optimizes motility (Batchelder et al. 2011). Phosphorylation of MSP has been observed in C. elegans and MSP dynamics seem to be the same, but the regulatory proteins between C. elegans and A. suum are not conserved (Fraire-Zamora et al. 2011). In C. elegans, homologs to proteins that regulate MSP assembly (MPAK, MPOP, or MFP2) have not been identified. Instead, SPE-6, a casein kinase I homolog, may play a role in MSP assembly (see Chap. 7, Chu and Shakes 2012; Varkey et al. 1993). MSP disassembly in C. elegans involves phosphatases, but not PP2A as in A. suum. As a potential alternative to PP2A, C. elegans employs two nearly identical sperm-specific PP1 phosphatases, GSP-3 and GSP-4 (GSP-3/4), for motility (Wu et al. 2011). GSP-3/4 are hypothesized to regulate the spatial disassembly of MSP and sperm from C. elegans lacking GSP-3/4 are immotile and have defects in pseudopod development (Wu et al. 2011). PP1 phosphatases are also necessary for sperm development and fertility in mice (Varmuza et al. 1999; Oppedisano et al. 2002; Chakrabarti et al. 2007; Huang and Vijayaraghavan 2004; Soler et al. 2009; Wu et al. 2011).
MSP plays diverse roles during fertilization and is necessary for generating the amoeboid movement of nematode sperm that is necessary for the sperm to migrate through the reproductive tract. Understanding MSP regulation will provide insight into how protein polymerization can generate and force and membrane protrusions (Smith 2006).
11.2.3 The Role of pH in Regulating Sperm Activation and MSP Polymerization
A change in intracellular pH can trigger sperm activation. Addition of weak bases, such as triethanolamine, is sufficient to activate C. elegans sperm in vitro (Ward et al. 1983). Similarly, the addition of vas deferens extract can activate A. suum sperm in vitro (Abbas and Cain 1979). Within 15 s of the addition of vas deferens extract, the intracellular pH rises from 6.25 to 6.50 in A. suum sperm, suggesting that sperm activation is accompanied by an increase in intracellular pH (King et al. 1994). Understanding the mechanism by which pH triggers sperm activation might provide insights into how ion channel regulation can affect vesicle fusion events and morphology changes.
Alterations in intracellular pH also have effects on the polymerization of MSP. Treatment of A. suum sperm with a weak acid promotes the disassembly of MSP fibers and removal of the weak acid promotes the re-assembly of MSP fibers (King et al. 1994). Additionally, in activated A. suum sperm a pH gradient is formed between the leading edge and the base of the pseudopod: the intracellular pH at the leading edge and base of the pseudopod are 6.35 and 6.17, respectively (King et al. 1994). In A. suum sperm, higher pH at the leading edge stimulates the phosphorylation of MPOP (see Sect. 11.2.2), which in turn assists in the nucleation of MSP fibers at the leading edge (Buttery et al. 2003).
11.3 Sperm and Oocyte Communication
11.3.1 Regulation of Sperm Guidance by Oocyte Polyunsaturated Fatty Acid-Derived Signals
For C. elegans, guiding sperm to and subsequently maintaining sperm within the spermatheca is crucial for maximal reproduction. Regardless of whether sperm originate from a hermaphrodite or male, sperm must be guided back into the spermatheca after they are pushed into the uterus by newly fertilized embryos on their way to the uterus (Ward and Carrel 1979).
In C. elegans, oocytes attract sperm to the spermatheca by releasing polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA)-derived prostaglandin signals produced by oocytes (Edmonds et al. 2010; Kubagawa et al. 2006). PUFAs are synthesized from dietary precursors by lipid anabolic enzymes. These enzymes, the so-called fat genes, include fat-2, a ∆12-desaturase that generates 18- and 20-carbon PUFAs (Watts and Browse 2002). In C. elegans PUFAs produced within the intestine are initially incorporated into the yolk, which is then taken up by oocytes via receptor-mediated endocytosis using the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor RME-2 (receptor mediated endocytosis-2) (Kubagawa et al. 2006; Grant and Hirsh 1999). Once the PUFAs enter the oocytes, they are converted into prostaglandins and eventually secreted into the reproductive tract (Edmonds et al. 2010). Notably, a number of signaling pathways in mammals are also regulated by prostaglandins, including many processes in mammalian reproduction such as ovulation and fertilization (Han et al. 2010).
Other Caenorhabditis species may also use prostaglandins for directional migration of sperm into the spermatheca (Singaravelu and Singson 2011). When males from one Caenorhabditis species were allowed to mate with hermaphrodites of another closely related species, the ejaculated sperm successfully reached the spermatheca, implying that directed sperm migration within the Caenorhabditis genus employs an evolutionarily conserved signal (Hill and L’Hernault 2001; Singaravelu and Singson 2011).
11.3.2 Secretion of MSP by Sperm to Induce Oocyte Maturation and Gonadal Sheath Cell Contraction
In C. elegans sperm, the MSP provides the signal to induce oocyte meiotic maturation and ovulation (see Chap. 10, Kim et al. 2012). MSP has two separate signaling functions (Miller et al. 2001). The 20 C-terminal amino acids of MSP promote sheath cell contraction that leads to ovulation and MSP lacking these 20 amino acids promote oocyte maturation (Miller et al. 2001). Using sperm-derived signals to regulate ovulation rates increases the probability that fertilization will take place, as oocytes are less likely to enter an empty spermatheca (McCarter et al. 1999; Miller et al. 2001). MSP is secreted from sperm through an unconventional vesicle budding process (Kosinski et al. 2005). The MSP signal persists as long as sperm are present (Miller et al. 2001). The signal for the first ovulation in a hermaphrodite originates from the spermatids, which have MSP and can signal for oocyte maturation and sheath contraction (McCarter et al. 1999).
11.4 Sperm–Oocyte Fusion
11.4.1 spe and egg Genes
In order for sperm and oocytes to fuse, the gametes must be able to recognize one another and have the fusion machinery localized and assembled properly to mediate fertilization. Precise recognition is mediated by specific interactions between proteins present on the surfaces of the sperm and oocyte. Mutations disrupting the fusion machinery on either gamete will impair fertilization but development is expected to be otherwise normal. Genes that are essential for sperm development, differentiation, or function during fusion are classified as spe genes (also previously referred to as fer genes) (also see Chap. 7, Chu and Shakes 2012; Singson 2001; Parry and Singson 2011). egg genes are defined as genes that are essential for the oocyte’s ability to promote sperm fusion or respond to fertilization but are not necessary for proper oogenesis (Singson 2001; Parry and Singson 2011). The number of genes known to be necessary for fertilization is low in all animal species and every gene that is identified and cloned will add a significant amount of information to our knowledge of how fertilization is mediated.
11.4.2 Sperm Genes Necessary for Fertilization
spe-9 was the first sperm gene necessary for fertilization to have been cloned (Singson et al. 1998). Sperm from animals with spe-9 mutations undergo normal spermatogenesis and sperm activation and have normal morphology and motility, but are unable to fertilize oocytes (Singson et al. 1998). Subsequently, all sperm genes that are fertilization-defective but undergo normal sperm activation are members of the spe-9 class of mutants. Currently, the spe-9 class of mutants consists of seven mutants (spe-9, spe-13, spe-36, spe-38, spe-41/trp-3, spe-42 and fer-14) (Table 11.1) (Singson et al. 1998; Kroft et al. 2005; Chatterjee et al. 2005; Xu and Sternberg 2003; L’Hernault et al. 1988; Putiri et al. 2004; L’Hernault 2006; Nishimura and L’Hernault 2010). Four of the genes responsible for the spe-9 class phenotype have been cloned (spe-9, spe-38, spe-41/trp-3, and spe-42), and we will focus on what is known about the function of these four genes.
spe-9: SPE-9 is a single-pass transmembrane protein with a large extracellular domain and a short cytoplasmic tail (Singson et al. 1998). The extracellular domain of SPE-9 has ten epidermal growth factor (EGF) repeats that are thought to mediate protein–protein interactions (Balzar et al. 2001; Singson et al. 1998). SPE-9 localization is dynamic: in spermatids, SPE-9 is localized uniformly over the entire plasma membrane, but after sperm activation, it is predominantly localized to the pseudopod (Fig. 11.2) (Zannoni et al. 2003).
spe-38: SPE-38 is a nematode specific, novel four-pass transmembrane protein that resembles many small tetraspanins which are associated with cell–cell interaction (Chatterjee et al. 2005). In spermatids, SPE-38 localizes to membranous organelles (MOs) (Chatterjee et al. 2005). In mature sperm, SPE-38 relocalizes to the pseudopod, similar to SPE-9 (Fig. 11.2) (Chatterjee et al. 2005).
spe-41/trp-3: SPE-41/TRP-3 is a transient receptor potential channel and is conserved from C. elegans to humans (Xu and Sternberg 2003). TRP-3 homologs have been implicated in a variety of pathologies, including cancer, heart disease, kidney disease, and pain (Dietrich et al. 2010; Kiselyov et al. 2007; Bodding 2007; Eder and Molkentin 2011; Chung et al. 2011). Like SPE-38, SPE-41/TRP-3 localizes to the MO in spermatids; however, SPE-41/TRP-3 localizes uniformly all over the plasma membrane in mature sperm and does not show pseudopod-only localization as do SPE-38 and SPE-9 (Fig. 11.2) (Xu and Sternberg 2003). In Drosophila, TRP channels have independent roles as a scaffold and calcium channel (Wang et al. 2005). Future areas of interest include determining whether the calcium channel activity of SPE-41/TRP-3 is separable from its role in fertility and whether SPE-41/TRP-3 plays a role in mediating the calcium increase observed during fertilization.
spe-42: SPE-42 is a novel six-pass transmembrane protein whose homologs are found in many metazoans, such as flies, mouse, and human (Kroft et al. 2005). SPE-42 contains a DC-STAMP (dendritic cell-specific transmembrane protein) domain, which is required for cell fusion of osteoclasts in mammals (Mensah et al. 2010; Miyamoto 2006). It has been hypothesized that the DC-STAMP domain of SPE-42 could be used for membrane fusion events, including sperm–egg fusion; however, the mechanism by which DC-STAMP domains mediate fusion is unclear, and currently there is no evidence to support this hypothesis (Wilson et al. 2011; Kroft et al. 2005). The C-terminal tail of SPE-42 forms a RING finger domain that has eight conserved cysteine residues that are thought to coordinate Zn2+ ions; a mutation in any of these cysteine residues abolishes SPE-42 function (Wilson et al. 2011).
At present, not much is known about how the spe-9 class of genes interact on the protein level. Recent work has shown that SPE-38 and SPE-41/TRP-3 interact both genetically and physically (Singaravelu et al. 2012). In spe-38 mutant spermatozoa, SPE-41/TRP-3 is trapped in the MO, suggesting that SPE-38 is required for the trafficking of SPE-41/TRP-3 following sperm activation. In contrast, the localization of SPE-38 is unperturbed in spe-41/trp-3 mutant sperm, suggesting that SPE-38 regulates SPE-41/TRP-3 trafficking and not vice versa. Split ubiquitin yeast-two hybrid results show that SPE-38 and SPE-41/TRP-3 can interact with each other. Further studies could elucidate whether SPE-38 modulates channel activity of SPE-41/TRP-3.
The SPE-9 class proteins may potentially function in sperm to mediate either recognizing, adhering, or fusing with the oocyte. All SPE-9 class proteins are membrane proteins and thus have the potential to be a sperm ligand. SPE-9 is the most likely candidate to serve as a sperm ligand because of the presence of multiple EGF repeats and the selective localization of SPE-9 to the pseudopod (Singson et al. 1998). Proteins that localize to the pseudopod are the best candidates to mediate fusion with the oocyte, as the pseudopod is thought to make initial contact with the oocyte (Zannoni et al. 2003). Delineating whether these SPE-9 class proteins function to organize the sperm membrane appropriately or as an adhesion molecule or fusogen will provide insight into the molecular basis of fertilization.
11.4.3 Oocyte Genes Necessary for Fertilization
Currently, only two genes on the oocyte are known to be necessary for fertilization: egg-1 and egg-2 (egg-1/2) (Kadandale et al. 2005). EGG-1 and EGG-2 are single-pass transmembrane proteins that contain low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor repeats on the plasma membrane of the oocyte (Kadandale et al. 2005). EGG-1 and EGG-2 are 67% identical and are likely to be functionally redundant (Kadandale et al. 2005). In C. elegans, the hermaphrodites lacking function egg-1 and egg-2, either by mutation or RNAi, lay unfertilized oocytes and have severe reductions in progeny production (Kadandale et al. 2005; Lee and Schedl 2001; Maeda et al. 2001; Johnston et al. 2010). Analysis of egg-1(tm1071) indicates that oocytes lacking egg-1 are ovulated and make contact with sperm, but a majority of the oocytes are not fertilized (Kadandale et al. 2005; Johnston et al. 2010). Proteins related to LDL receptors bind with diverse ligands such as lipoproteins, viruses, and signaling molecules, and thus could mediate fertilization (Nykjaer and Willnow 2002). The identification of additional transmembrane proteins in the oocyte is paramount to our understanding of C. elegans fertilization and could provide insight into how fertilization is mediated in all species.
11.4.4 Species-Specific Fertilization in Caenorhabditis
Fertilization in the Caenorhabditis species is specific; however, a selected number Caenorhabditis species are able to fertilize the oocytes of other species (Table 11.2) (Baird et al. 1992; Sudhaus and Kiontke 2007; Baird and Yen 2000; Hill and L’Hernault 2001; Kiontke and Fitch 2005). The elegans group of Caenorhabditis contains four species: C. elegans, C. briggsae, C. remanei, and C. brenneri (Kiontke and Fitch 2005). C. elegans is actually a sister species of a clade (a species and all of its descendents) made up of C. briggsae, C. remanei, and C. brenneri (Kiontke and Fitch 2005). Like C. elegans, C. briggsae is a hermaphrodite–male species while C. remanei and C. brenneri are female–male species (Kiontke and Fitch 2005). Interestingly, C. brenneri oocytes can be fertilized by sperm from any of the three other members of the elegans group, indicating that C. brenneri oocytes possess receptor(s) that can recognize ligand(s) on C. elegans, C. briggsae, and C. remanei sperm and mediate fusion (Baird and Yen 2000). On the other hand, C. elegans and C. briggsae oocytes can only be fertilized by sperm from their own species (Baird et al. 1992). Despite the fact that fertilization can occur between species of the elegans group, these fertilization events do not result in fertile offspring, indicating that there is post-zygotic incompatibility (Baird et al. 1992; Sudhaus and Kiontke 2007; Baird and Yen 2000; Sudhaus et al. 2007). Studying the species specificity of fertilization in the elegans group may provide clues as to which proteins mediate sperm–egg fusion as well as insight into the evolutionary origins of the species.
11.5 Egg Activation
The transition from an oocyte to an embryo is comprised of two steps: meiotic maturation and egg activation (Stitzel and Seydoux 2007). During meiotic maturation, the oocyte exits meiotic prophase, initiates the meiotic division phase, and becomes fertilization competent (see Chap. 10, Kim et al. 2012; Stitzel and Seydoux 2007; Horner and Wolfner 2008; Yamamoto et al. 2006). Egg activation is the transition of a fertilized egg to a developing embryo. Egg activation entails a number of dynamic cellular processes: completion of meiosis, maternal protein degradation, cytoskeletal rearrangements, activation of embryogenesis, and eggshell formation (Stitzel and Seydoux 2007; Horner and Wolfner 2008).
11.5.1 Regulation of Meiotic Resumption
In C. elegans it is critical that meiotic resumption and cell cycle progression are tightly regulated because of the continual production of oocytes and rapid fertilization (McCarter et al. 1999). In many animals, oocytes arrest in late meiotic prophase to temporally control utilization and often have a second arrest during the meiotic divisions; in most vertebrates, oocytes arrest in prophase I until they are cyclically recruited and then arrest again in metaphase II as they wait for a fertilization-competent sperm (Masui and Clarke 1979; Eppig 1996; McCarter et al. 1999). However, in C. elegans, oocytes are produced continually in the presence of sperm, so there is no need for oocytes to arrest in meiotic prophase (although they do arrest in late meiotic prophase in the absence of sperm) (McCarter et al. 1999). Additionally, since sperm signal both maturation and ovulation, there is no need to arrest the oocyte cell cycle in order to wait for the arrival of competent sperm (McCarter et al. 1999; Miller et al. 2001). In fact, in the absence of sperm, oocytes progress to anaphase I (McNally and McNally 2005). As a result, meiotic resumption and completion as well as egg activation events associated with fertilization occur concurrently, making tight regulatory control critical for proper embryogenesis.
In C. elegans, fertilization occurs as the oocyte enters the spermatheca, after germinal vesicle breakdown and while the meiosis I spindle is assembling (McNally and McNally 2005) (Fig. 11.3a). Fertilization is accompanied by an increase in free cytosolic calcium levels (Samuel et al. 2001). The increase in cytoplasmic calcium levels at fertilization occurs in other animals; however, the functional consequence of this change in calcium dynamics in C. elegans needs to be more fully explored (Samuel et al. 2001; Horner and Wolfner 2008). In Xenopus, a calcium signal triggers the exit from meiosis II by activating the anaphase-promoting complex APC/C (Tunquist et al. 2002; Liu and Maller 2005; Rauh et al. 2005). Like Xenopus, the completion of meiosis in C. elegans requires APC/C; however, the role of calcium is unknown (Furuta et al. 2000; Golden et al. 2000; Siomos et al. 2001; Davis et al. 2002; Shakes et al. 2011). In C. elegans, activation of APC/C is fertilization independent (McNally and McNally 2005). Oocytes that are ovulated but not fertilized complete the metaphase-to-anaphase transition in meiosis I (McNally and McNally 2005). In the absence of fertilization, oocytes will progress through anaphase I but cannot transition to metaphase II, as they fail to form polar bodies or assemble meiosis II spindles (McNally and McNally 2005). Unfertilized oocytes, which lack centrioles/MTOC from sperm, undergo continuous cycles of DNA replication without cytokinesis, termed endoreplication or endo-mitotic reduplication (McNally and McNally 2005; Ward and Carrel 1979). Unfertilized oocytes are able to progress through anaphase I because cyclin B is partially degraded by APC/C, but full cyclin B degradation will not occur without fertilization (McNally and McNally 2005). Fertilization acts as the trigger to degrade cyclin B further (possibly through activation of the ZYG-11/CUL-2 E3 ubiqutin ligase) and allows for the progression into meiosis II (McNally and McNally 2005).
The rapid succession of the meiotic divisions and the requirement of fertilization for completion of the second meiotic division represent unique challenges for regulation, especially since both divisions rely on many common factors (i.e., cyclin B and APC/C). Identifying the factors that account for and regulate the two meiotic divisions is important as will be understanding how the increase in cytoplasmic calcium is originated, transmitted, and interpreted.
11.5.2 Coordination of Egg Activation Events
As noted above, unfertilized oocytes can progress through anaphase I without fertilization (McNally and McNally 2005). In addition, egg activation events such as maternal protein degradation, cytoskeletal rearrangements, and the activation of early embryogenesis cues can also occur without fertilization (McNally and McNally 2005; Pellettieri et al. 2003; Stitzel et al. 2006). However, fertilization is necessary for the proper spatial and temporal control of these events as well as the completion of meiosis, secretion of the eggshell, and proper timing of embryogenesis (McNally and McNally 2005; Parry et al. 2009; Maruyama et al. 2007; Cheng et al. 2009; Stitzel et al. 2007).
Recent studies have identified three pseudo-phosphatases, EGG-3, EGG-4, and EGG-5, that are required to coordinate egg activation events (Maruyama et al. 2007; Stitzel et al. 2007; Parry et al. 2009; Cheng et al. 2009) (Fig. 11.3). As pseudo-phosphatases, EGG-3, EGG-4, and EGG-5 contain inactive protein tyrosine phosphatase (PTP) domains that allow them to bind to phosphotyrosine residues without promoting their hydrolysis (Maruyama et al. 2007; Stitzel et al. 2007; Parry et al. 2009; Cheng et al. 2009). egg-4 and egg-5 are functionally redundant genes with 99.2% amino acid identity; for this reason, this pair of genes and their products is referred to as egg-4/5 and EGG-4/5 (Parry et al. 2009). In the absence of EGG-3 and EGG-4/5, fertilized oocytes fail to extrude polar bodies, form a proper eggshell, or yield embryos that develop properly (Maruyama et al. 2007; Parry et al. 2009).
Exactly how EGG-3 and EGG-4/5 coordinate meiotic completion, fertilization, and embryogenesis is not well understood. However, it is clear that one of the main functions of EGG-3 and EGG-4/5 is to regulate MBK-2 (minibrain kinase-2), a kinase responsible for embryonic development (Maruyama et al. 2007; Stitzel et al. 2007; Parry et al. 2009; Cheng et al. 2009; Pellettieri et al. 2003). MBK-2 is a kinase that modifies many oocyte proteins, which are essential for multiple steps of embryonic development (Pellettieri et al. 2003). Known MBK-2 substrates include MEI-1, OMA-1, OMA-2, MEX-5, and MEX-6 (see Chap. 12, Robertson and Lin 2012; Guven-Ozkan et al. 2008; Nishi et al. 2008; Pang et al. 2004; Pellettieri et al. 2003; Quintin et al. 2003). MEI-1, a homolog of the microtubule severing protein katanin p60, is necessary for meiotic spindle function, and it is signaled for degradation through phosphorylation by MBK-2 (Bowerman and Kurz 2006; Lu and Mains 2007; Stitzel et al. 2006). OMA-1 and OMA-2 prevent precocious embryogenesis by sequestering the general transcription factor component TAF-4 (TATA-binding protein associated factor 4) in the cytoplasm, thus repressing transcription in early embryonic blastomeres (Detwiler et al. 2001; Guven-Ozkan et al. 2008). Phosphorylation by MBK-2 activates OMA-1 and OMA-2 and facilitates OMA-1/2 interaction with TAF-4 (Detwiler et al. 2001; Guven-Ozkan et al. 2008). MEX-5 and MEX-6 regulate embryonic polarity (Schubert et al. 2000). Phosophorylation by MBK-2 is a prerequisite for MEX-5 and MEX-6 activation by the polo kinases PLK-1 and PLK-2 (Schubert et al. 2000; Nishi et al. 2008). The variety of MBK-2 substrates necessitates tight control of MBK-2 activity by EGG-3 and EGG-4/5 in order to prevent aberrant spatial and temporal activation of many critical factors in embryogenesis.
MBK-2 activity is controlled by EGG-3 and EGG-4/5 in two ways. First, MBK-2 is physically sequestered to the oocyte cortex in a complex with EGG-3 and EGG-4/5 that is localized to the plasma membrane through an interaction between the integral membrane protein CHS-1 and EGG-3 (Harris et al. 2000; Maruyama et al. 2007; Veronico et al. 2001; Zhang et al. 2005; Singson et al. 2008) (Fig. 11.3b). Secondly, EGG-4/5 uses its PTP domain to bind the phosphotyrosine in the activation loop of MBK-2, thereby inhibiting MBK-2 by blocking access to substrates and reducing catalytic activity (Cheng et al. 2009).
The full release of MBK-2 inhibition is also accomplished sequentially. First, MBK-2 is phosphorylated by the MPF component CDK-1 (Cheng et al. 2009). Second, at meiotic anaphase I, EGG-3 is targeted for and degraded by the ubiquitin ligase containing APC/C. These events lead to the dissociation of the MBK-2–EGG-3–EGG-4/5 complex, thereby allowing MBK-2 to be released and to act on its substrates (Stitzel et al. 2007) (Fig. 11.3d). The regulation of MBK-2 by the EGG complex is dependent upon cell cycle progression but not fertilization. However, embryogenesis will ultimately fail because, without fertilization, the oocyte DNA will undergo endoreplication because of a number of reasons, including the inability to form polar bodies, assemble meiosis II spindles, or degrade cyclin B further (Maruyama et al. 2007; Stitzel et al. 2007; Cheng et al. 2009; Parry et al. 2009).
Unlike other factors in this cascade, EGG-3 and EGG-4/5 regulate fertilization-independent events, including MBK-2 activity, as well as fertilization-dependent events, including actin cap formation, polar body extrusion, and secretion of the eggshell (Maruyama et al. 2007; Stitzel et al. 2007; Cheng et al. 2009; Parry et al. 2009; McNally and McNally 2005). Future directions include the identification of additional regulatory elements necessary for the coordination of egg activation events to fertilization, as well as signal transduction pathways that promote meiotic completion and eggshell exocytosis.
11.5.3 The Role of Sperm in Egg Activation and Embryogenesis
Fertilization provides multiple sperm components that are necessary to coordinate meiotic progression and egg activation and to ensure proper embryogenesis. Each haploid sperm has a single pair of centrioles and, after fertilization, these centrioles duplicate and ultimately generate the two active centrosomes that establish the two poles of the embryo’s first mitotic spindle (Albertson 1984; Dammermann et al. 2008; Pelletier et al. 2006; Albertson and Thomson 1993). C. elegans sperm also supply the centrosome that specifies the anterior–posterior axis (O’Connell et al. 2000; Cowan and Hyman 2004; Hamill et al. 2002; Wallenfang and Seydoux 2000). In addition to providing organelles, sperm provide proteins necessary for egg activation (SPE-11) and embryogenesis (CYK-4) (Browning and Strome 1996; Jenkins et al. 2006).
spe-11 is predicted to encode a sperm-specific novel cytoplasmic protein that exhibits a perinuclear localization pattern (Browning and Strome 1996). Sperm produced by spe-11 mutants are capable of fertilizing oocytes but are unable to activate them, and oocytes fertilized by spe-11 mutants have defects in meiosis (spindle orientation and cytokinesis) and embryogenesis, do not secrete an eggshell, and do not produce polar bodies (Hill et al. 1989; McNally and McNally 2005). spe-11 paternal-effect lethal embryos can assemble the meiosis I spindle; however, the anaphase I chromosomes do not segregate and instead collapse back together and individualize (McNally and McNally 2005). Despite the defect in chromosome segregation at anaphase I, spe-11 embryos are able to form a meiosis II spindle and undergo normal anaphase II separation, ultimately producing two female pronuclei (McNally and McNally 2005). The assembly of a meiosis II spindle in spe-11 embryos indicates a role for sperm contributions to meiosis spindle assembly and cytokinesis, as unfertilized oocytes do not assemble a meiosis II spindle (McNally and McNally 2005). Using transgenes to ectopically supply spe-11 gene function through maternal expression in oocytes, rescues spe-11 function suggesting it acts when it is incorporated into the embryo after fertilization (Browning and Strome 1996).
In C. elegans, the sperm-enriched cyk-4 gene product, a Rho guanosine triposphatase (GTPase)-activating protein (GAP), is necessary for establishing anterior–posterior polarity (Portereiko et al. 2004; Portereiko and Mango 2001; Jenkins et al. 2006). CYK-4 is enriched in the MO of sperm and is detected in the posterior cortex of the one-cell embryo after fertilization (Jenkins et al. 2006). CYK-4, along with the small GTPase RhoA (Ras homolog gene family, member A) and ECT-2, a RhoA guanine nucleotide-exchange factor, modulate myosin light-chain activity to create an actomyosin gradient (Jenkins et al. 2006). The actomyosin gradient is necessary to establish the anterior domain of the embryo and properly localizes the polarity proteins PAR-3 and PAR-6 (Jenkins et al. 2006). Additional sperm proteins that regulate and coordinate egg activation are yet to be identified, but it is clear that sperm entry plays an important role in these processes (McNally and McNally 2005).
11.5.4 Additional Sperm Contributions
Paternal mitochondria: When sperm–egg fusion occurs, paternal mitochondria in the sperm are incorporated into the oocyte cytoplasm. To ensure that the maternal mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is inherited in C. elegans, paternal mitochondria are eliminated by autophagy in the oocyte (Sato and Sato 2011; Al Rawi et al. 2011). Autophagy allows for the degradation of cytoplasmic proteins and organelles by sequestering them to autophagosomes and eventually lysosomes where they are broken down (Nakatogawa et al. 2009; Sato and Sato 2011; Mizushima 2007; Xie and Klionsky 2007; Al Rawi et al. 2011). Two recent reports found that autophagosomes engulf paternal mitochondria and that the mitochondria are degraded during early embryogenesis (Sato and Sato 2011; Al Rawi et al. 2011). Both reports also found that lgg-1, a gene necessary for autophagosome formation, was necessary for clearance of paternal mitochondria (Sato and Sato 2011; Al Rawi et al. 2011). LGG-1 and LGG-2 are orthologs of S. cerevisae Atg8 and mammalian LC3 (Nakatogawa et al. 2009; Mizushima 2007; Xie and Klionsky 2007; Alberti et al. 2010). lgg-1 null mutant homozygotes were able to produce fertilized eggs; however, 36% of the eggs were unable to hatch and 59% of the embryos that did hatch died at the L1 larval stage (Sato and Sato 2011). These findings provide evidence that paternal mitochondria are actively degraded and that degradation, not dilution of paternal mtDNA by an excess of maternal mtDNA, is the primary mode of ensuring maternal mtDNA inheritance (Sato and Sato 2011; Al Rawi et al. 2011). This paradigm may also hold true in mammals, as mouse autophagy has been shown to be necessary for preimplantation development (Tsukamoto et al. 2008; Sato and Sato 2011). Moreover, the paternal mitochondria in mouse sperm, which are located in the midpiece of the flagellum, stain positively with an anti-LC3 antibody after fertilization indicating that autophagy plays a role in the degradation of paternal mitochondria (Al Rawi et al. 2011).
peel-1/zeel-1 element: Sperm also deliver another other component that is actually toxic if the proper antidote is not present in the embryo (Seidel et al. 2011; Seidel et al. 2008). The C. elegans gene peel-1 (paternal effect epistatic embryonic lethal-1) encodes a four-pass transmembrane protein that localizes to MOs in spermatids and is delivered to the embryo during fertilization (Seidel et al. 2011). PEEL-1 is a potent toxin that disrupts the development of muscle and epidermal tissue during late embryogenesis (Seidel et al. 2011). To neutralize the toxicity of PEEL-1 the embryo transiently expresses zeel-1 (zygotic epistatic embryonic lethal-1) (Seidel et al. 2011). ZEEL-1 is six-pass transmembrane protein, the transmembrane domain of which is necessary for its function as an antidote to PEEL-1 (Seidel et al. 2011). The cause of PEEL-1 toxicity and the mechanism by which ZEEL-1 mitigates PEEL-1 toxicity are unknown (Seidel et al. 2011). Seidel et al. hypothesize that ZEEL-1 could promote the degradation of PEEL-1 or prevent PEEL-1 from binding to its target (Seidel et al. 2011).
Despite its deleterious effects on zygotic development, peel-1 maintains its place in the genome through an inseparable association with its antidote zeel-1 (Seidel et al. 2008, 2011). peel-1 and zeel-1 are adjacent genes and cannot be separated by homologous recombination; they are referred to as the peel-1/zeel-1 element (Seidel et al. 2008). The peel-1/zeel-1 element persists because, in C. elegans, homozygosity, not heterozygosity, is most common as a result of a low number of males in the population (Seidel et al. 2011). The evolutionary origins of the peel-1/zeel-1 element are unknown (Seidel et al. 2008, 2011). The peel-1/zeel-1 element is intriguing from the perspective of fertilization and embryogenesis because it may provide insight into how sperm-supplied factors are interpreted by and influence zygotic transcription and embryonic development.
11.6 The Eggshell
11.6.1 Eggshell Structure
The chitin eggshell is deposited and assembled after fertilization and is essential for C. elegans embryogenesis (Rappleye et al. 1999; Bembenek et al. 2007; McNally and McNally 2005). Structural support provided by the eggshell allows for the completion of meiosis, polar body extrusion, and establishment of embryo polarity, and it also forms an osmotic barrier that protects the developing embryo from osmotic changes (Rappleye et al. 1999; Siomos et al. 2001; Kaitna et al. 2000; McNally and McNally 2005). The C. elegans eggshell is made of three layers: the outer vitelline layer, the middle chitin layer, and the inner lipid-rich layer (Rappleye et al. 1999). At the time of fertilization, the outer vitelline layer that surrounds the developing oocyte begins to separate from the plasma membrane as the chitin layer is formed (Rappleye et al. 1999; Bembenek et al. 2007). The middle chitin layer is formed during metaphase I and provides the eggshell with its mechanical strength (Rappleye et al. 1999; Maruyama et al. 2007). Chitin is formed through the polymerization of UDP-N-acteylglucosamine (UDP-GlcNAc), which is catalyzed by the oocyte membrane protein CHS-1, and the chitin-binding protein CBD-1 is necessary for the formation of a continuous chitin layer (Rappleye et al. 1999; Zhang et al. 2005; Maruyama et al. 2007; Johnston et al. 2010). The lipid-rich inner layer of the eggshell begins to form during anaphase I and provides osmotic and mechanical strength (Rappleye et al. 1999; Bembenek et al. 2007; Sato et al. 2008). The eggshell performs diverse roles for the C. elegans embryo and, without proper eggshell deposition, the embryo is not able to divide properly and is susceptible to many mechanical and osmotic stresses (Rappleye et al. 1999; McNally and McNally 2005).
11.6.2 Cortical Granule Exocytosis
Cortical granules (CGs) are Golgi-derived secretory vesicles that are stored at the cortex of oocytes (Horner and Wolfner 2008). In C. elegans, CGs are necessary for proper eggshell formation (Bembenek et al. 2007; Sato et al. 2008). CG exocytosis occurs during anaphase I in response to APC/C activation—not fertilization—and requires a number of cell cycle components, including the C. elegans ortholog separase-1 SEP-1 as well as the small GTPase RAB-11.1 and the target-SNARE SYN-4 (Bembenek et al. 2007; Sato et al. 2008). CGs contain chondroitin proteoglycans and, upon exocytosis, these chondroitin proteoglycans are released to the extracellular space surrounding the embryo (Hwang and Horvitz 2002; Bembenek et al. 2007; Sato et al. 2008).
The role of chondroitin proteoglycans in eggshell formation is unclear. Two chondroitin proteoglycans, CPG-1 and CPG-2, are known to bind chitin, thus suggesting a role for CPG-1 and CPG-2 in the formation or maintenance of the chitin layer (Bembenek et al. 2007; Olson et al. 2006). However, chondroitin proteoglycans are present in CGs and are not exocytosed until after the chitin layer has formed during anaphase I, implicating a role for chondroitin proteoglycans in the formation of the lipid-rich layer (Bembenek et al. 2007; Sato et al. 2008). Determining the precise localization and role for chondroitin proteoglycans in eggshell formation will aid in understanding how the eggshell provides osmotic and mechanical strength.
11.6.3 Membrane Block to Polyspermy
C. elegans have a robust block to polyspermy (Ward and Carrel 1979). In addition to the ovulated oocyte, the spermatheca also contains multiple sperm in an extremely tight space (Ward and Carrel 1979). Despite contact with multiple sperm, C. elegans oocytes are only fertilized by a single sperm (Ward and Carrel 1979). Once fertilization occurs, the oocyte prevents additional sperm from entering (Ward and Carrel 1979). Recently, embryos with multiple fused sperm have been described; however, these polyspermic events occur in a very small percentage of the embryos examined (Parry et al. 2009; Johnston et al. 2010). In C. elegans, polyspermy has been observed after the depletion of chs-1, gna-2, or egg-4/5 (Parry et al. 2009; Johnston et al. 2010). As discussed earlier, CHS-1 is necessary for the polymerization of the chitin component UDP-N-acteylglucosamine (Zhang et al. 2005). gna-2 encodes a GLD-regulated glucosamine-6-P N acetyltransferase that supplies UDP-N-acetyl glucosamine for chitin biosynthesis (Johnston et al. 2006). The role of chs-1 and gna-2 in chitin synthesis indicates a potential role for chitin in the block to polyspermy.
In other organisms, cortical granule exocytosis is known to contribute to polyspermy blocks (Wessel et al. 2001). The connection between CG exocytosis and the block to polyspermy in C. elegans is unclear, but evidence from egg-4/5 embryos indicates that CG exocytosis does not act in the block to polyspermy (Parry et al. 2009). egg-4/5 embryos seem to have normal CG exocytosis but polyspermic embryos can still be detected (Parry et al. 2009). However, since the majority of egg-4/5 embryos are not polyspermic, there may be other contributions to the block to polyspermy or more subtle details about CG exocytosis that are not yet understood (Parry et al. 2009).
11.7 Conclusion
Fertilization in C. elegans involves a vast number of cell processes that must be executed with high fidelity so as to ensure the successful propagation of the species. First, C. elegans must produce haploid gametes with extraordinary differences in morphology and function to ensure they are able to locate one another. When the gametes finally do meet, they will only fuse if they are from the correct species despite the fact sperm from other species look similar and can enter the reproductive tract and migrate to the site of fertilization. Finally, the oocyte must only allow one sperm to enter, sort out which components of the sperm are necessary for embryogenesis, and then initiate embryonic development. Many questions remain about how fertilization is regulated in C. elegans. What are the signal transduction pathways that allow sperm to respond to prostaglandin signals from the oocyte? How is the developmental program regulated during the oocyte-to-embryo transition? How does the eggshell form? How is the rapid block to polyspermy triggered? Finally, the central question remains—how is sperm–egg fusion mediated?
The genetic and molecular basis of fertilization is not well understood. The study of fertilization in C. elegans provides an excellent opportunity to understand the molecular functions of the genes that are necessary for fertilization and to discover previously unpredicted genes necessary for this fundamental process of sexual reproduction. The study of mammalian fertilization has been difficult, partially because the ability to obtain and successfully manipulate gametes is challenging. C. elegans is an emerging model system to study fertilization. Many parallels have already been identified between cellular processes in C. elegans and other species. The molecular and genetic techniques available for use in C. elegans allow for relatively easy gene discovery. It is possible that many of the genes that are necessary for fertilization in C. elegans will also be important in mammalian systems because of the conserved features of sexual reproduction.
References
Abbas M, Cain GD (1979) In vitro activation and behavior of the ameboid sperm of Ascaris suum (Nematoda). Cell Tissue Res 200(2):273–284
Al Rawi S, Louvet-Vallee S, Djeddi A, Sachse M, Culetto E, Hajjar C, Boyd L, Legouis R, Galy V (2011) Postfertilization autophagy of sperm organelles prevents paternal mitochondrial DNA transmission. Science 334(6059):1144–1147. doi:science.1211878[pii]10.1126/science.1211878
Alberti A, Michelet X, Djeddi A, Legouis R (2010) The autophagosomal protein LGG-2 acts synergistically with LGG-1 in dauer formation and longevity in C. elegans. Autophagy 6(5). doi:12252[pii]
Albertson DG (1984) Formation of the first cleavage spindle in nematode embryos. Dev Biol 101(1):61–72. doi:0012-1606(84)90117-9[pii]
Albertson DG, Thomson JN (1993) Segregation of holocentric chromosomes at meiosis in the nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans. Chromosome Res 1(1):15–26
Baird SE, Yen WC (2000) Reproductive isolation in Caenorhabditis: terminal phenotypes of hybrid embryos. Evol Dev 2(1):9–15
Baird SE, Sutherlin ME, Emmons SW (1992) Reproductive isolation in Rhabditidae (Nematoda: Secernentea); mechanisms that isolate six species of three genera. Evolution 46(3):585–594
Baker AM, Roberts TM, Stewart M (2002) 2.6 A resolution crystal structure of helices of the motile major sperm protein (MSP) of Caenorhabditis elegans. J Mol Biol 319(2):491–499. doi:10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00294-2 S0022-2836(02)00294-2[pii]
Baldi C, Viviano J, Ellis RE (2011) A bias caused by ectopic development produces sexually dimorphic sperm in nematodes. Curr Biol 21(16):1416–1420. doi:S0960-9822(11)00835-9[pii]10.1016/j.cub.2011.07.034
Balzar M, Briaire-de Bruijn IH, Rees-Bakker HA, Prins FA, Helfrich W, de Leij L, Riethmuller G, Alberti S, Warnaar SO, Fleuren GJ, Litvinov SV (2001) Epidermal growth factor-like repeats mediate lateral and reciprocal interactions of Ep-CAM molecules in homophilic adhesions. Mol Cell Biol 21(7):2570–2580. doi:10.1128/MCB.21.7.2570-2580.2001
Batchelder EL, Hollopeter G, Campillo C, Mezanges X, Jorgensen EM, Nassoy P, Sens P, Plastino J (2011) Membrane tension regulates motility by controlling lamellipodium organization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(28):11429–11434. doi:1010481108[pii]10.1073/pnas.1010481108
Bembenek JN, Richie CT, Squirrell JM, Campbell JM, Eliceiri KW, Poteryaev D, Spang A, Golden A, White JG (2007) Cortical granule exocytosis in C. elegans is regulated by cell cycle components including separase. Development 134(21):3837–3848. doi:dev.011361[pii]10.1242/dev.011361
Bodding M (2007) TRP proteins and cancer. Cell Signal 19(3):617–624. doi:S0898-6568(06)00206-3[pii]10.1016/j.cellsig.2006.08.012
Bowerman B, Kurz T (2006) Degrade to create: developmental requirements for ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis during early C. elegans embryogenesis. Development 133(5):773–784. doi:133/5/773[pii]10.1242/dev.02276
Browning H, Strome S (1996) A sperm-supplied factor required for embryogenesis in C. elegans. Development 122(1):391–404
Bullock TL, Parthasarathy G, King KL, Kent HM, Roberts TM, Stewart M (1996a) New crystal forms of the motile major sperm protein (MSP) of Ascaris suum. J Struct Biol 116(3):432–437. doi:S1047-8477(96)90061-1[pii]10.1006/jsbi.1996.0061
Bullock TL, Roberts TM, Stewart M (1996b) 2.5 A resolution crystal structure of the motile major sperm protein (MSP) of Ascaris suum. J Mol Biol 263(2):284–296. doi:S0022-2836(96)90575-6[pii]10.1006/jmbi.1996.0575
Buttery SM, Ekman GC, Seavy M, Stewart M, Roberts TM (2003) Dissection of the Ascaris sperm motility machinery identifies key proteins involved in major sperm protein-based amoeboid locomotion. Mol Biol Cell 14(12):5082–5088. doi:10.1091/mbc.E03-04-0246 E03-04-0246[pii]
Chakrabarti R, Cheng L, Puri P, Soler D, Vijayaraghavan S (2007) Protein phosphatase PP1 gamma 2 in sperm morphogenesis and epididymal initiation of sperm motility. Asian J Androl 9(4):445–452. doi:10.1111/j.1745-7262.2007.00307.x
Chatterjee I, Richmond A, Putiri E, Shakes DC, Singson A (2005) The Caenorhabditis elegans spe-38 gene encodes a novel four-pass integral membrane protein required for sperm function at fertilization. Development 132(12):2795–2808. doi:132/12/2795[pii]10.1242/dev.01868
Cheng KC, Klancer R, Singson A, Seydoux G (2009) Regulation of MBK-2/DYRK by CDK-1 and the pseudophosphatases EGG-4 and EGG-5 during the oocyte-to-embryo transition. Cell 139(3):560–572. doi:S0092-8674(09)01187-8[pii]10.1016/j.cell.2009.08.047
Chu DS, Shakes DC (2012) Spermatogenesis. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 757:171–203. (Chap. 7, this volume) Springer, New York
Chung MK, Jung SJ, Oh SB (2011) Role of TRP channels in pain sensation. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 704:615–636. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-0265-3_33
Cowan CR, Hyman AA (2004) Centrosomes direct cell polarity independently of microtubule assembly in C. elegans embryos. Nature 431(7004):92–96. doi:10.1038/nature02825 nature02825[pii]
Dammermann A, Maddox PS, Desai A, Oegema K (2008) SAS-4 is recruited to a dynamic structure in newly forming centrioles that is stabilized by the gamma-tubulin-mediated addition of centriolar microtubules. J Cell Biol 180(4):771–785. doi:jcb.200709102[pii]10.1083/jcb.200709102
Davis ES, Wille L, Chestnut BA, Sadler PL, Shakes DC, Golden A (2002) Multiple subunits of the Caenorhabditis elegans anaphase-promoting complex are required for chromosome segregation during meiosis I. Genetics 160(2):805–813
Detwiler MR, Reuben M, Li X, Rogers E, Lin R (2001) Two zinc finger proteins, OMA-1 and OMA-2, are redundantly required for oocyte maturation in C. elegans. Dev Cell 1(2):187–199. doi:S1534-5807(01)00026-0[pii]
Dietrich A, Chubanov V, Gudermann T (2010) Renal TRPathies. J Am Soc Nephrol 21(5):736–744. doi:ASN.2009090948[pii]10.1681/ASN.2009090948
Eder P, Molkentin JD (2011) TRPC channels as effectors of cardiac hypertrophy. Circ Res 108(2):265–272. doi:108/2/265[pii]10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.225888
Edmonds JW, Prasain JK, Dorand D, Yang Y, Hoang HD, Vibbert J, Kubagawa HM, Miller MA (2010) Insulin/FOXO signaling regulates ovarian prostaglandins critical for reproduction. Dev Cell 19(6):858–871. doi:S1534-5807(10)00532-0[pii]10.1016/j.devcel.2010.11.005
Eppig JJ (1996) Coordination of nuclear and cytoplasmic oocyte maturation in eutherian mammals. Reprod Fertil Dev 8(4):485–489
Fraire-Zamora JJ, Broitman-Maduro G, Maduro M, Cardullo RA (2011) Evidence for phosphorylation in the MSP cytoskeletal filaments of amoeboid spermatozoa. Int J Biochem Mol Biol 2(3):263–273
Furuta T, Tuck S, Kirchner J, Koch B, Auty R, Kitagawa R, Rose AM, Greenstein D (2000) EMB-30: an APC4 homologue required for metaphase-to-anaphase transitions during meiosis and mitosis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Mol Biol Cell 11(4):1401–1419
Geldziler B, Kadandale P, Singson A (2004) Molecular genetic approaches to studying fertilization in model systems. Reproduction 127(4):409–416. doi:10.1530/rep. 1.00009 127/4/409[pii]
Geldziler B, Marcello MR, Shakes DC, Singson A (2011) The genetics and cell biology fertilization. In: Rothman JL, Singson A (eds) Caenorhabditis elegans: molecular genetics and development, methods in cell biology, vol 106. Elsevier, Oxford
Golden A, Sadler PL, Wallenfang MR, Schumacher JM, Hamill DR, Bates G, Bowerman B, Seydoux G, Shakes DC (2000) Metaphase to anaphase (mat) transition-defective mutants in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Cell Biol 151(7):1469–1482
Grant B, Hirsh D (1999) Receptor-mediated endocytosis in the Caenorhabditis elegans oocyte. Mol Biol Cell 10(12):4311–4326
Grant RP, Buttery SM, Ekman GC, Roberts TM, Stewart M (2005) Structure of MFP2 and its function in enhancing MSP polymerization in Ascaris sperm amoeboid motility. J Mol Biol 347(3):583–595. doi:S0022-2836(05)00099-9[pii]10.1016/j.jmb.2005.01.054
Guven-Ozkan T, Nishi Y, Robertson SM, Lin R (2008) Global transcriptional repression in C. elegans germline precursors by regulated sequestration of TAF-4. Cell 135(1):149–160. doi:S0092-8674(08)00960-4[pii]10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.040
Haaf A, Butler PJ, Kent HM, Fearnley IM, Roberts TM, Neuhaus D, Stewart M (1996) The motile major sperm protein (MSP) from Ascaris suum is a symmetric dimer in solution. J Mol Biol 260(2):251–260. doi:S0022283696903964[pii]
Hamill DR, Severson AF, Carter JC, Bowerman B (2002) Centrosome maturation and mitotic spindle assembly in C. elegans require SPD-5, a protein with multiple coiled-coil domains. Dev Cell 3(5):673–684. doi:S1534580702003271[pii]
Han SM, Cottee PA, Miller MA (2010) Sperm and oocyte communication mechanisms controlling C. elegans fertility. Dev Dyn 239(5):1265–1281. doi:10.1002/dvdy.22202
Harris MT, Lai K, Arnold K, Martinez HF, Specht CA, Fuhrman JA (2000) Chitin synthase in the filarial parasite, Brugia malayi. Mol Biochem Parasitol 111(2):351–362. doi:S0166685100003285[pii]
Hill KL, L’Hernault SW (2001) Analyses of reproductive interactions that occur after heterospecific matings within the genus Caenorhabditis. Dev Biol 232(1):105–114. doi:10.1006/dbio.2000.0136 S0012-1606(00)90136-2[pii]
Hill DP, Shakes DC, Ward S, Strome S (1989) A sperm-supplied product essential for initiation of normal embryogenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans is encoded by the paternal-effect embryonic-lethal gene, spe-11. Dev Biol 136(1):154–166. doi:0012-1606(89)90138-3[pii]
Hirsh D, Oppenheim D, Klass M (1976) Development of the reproductive system of Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol 49(1):200–219. doi:0012-1606(76)90267-0[pii]
Horner VL, Wolfner MF (2008) Transitioning from egg to embryo: triggers and mechanisms of egg activation. Dev Dyn 237(3):527–544. doi:10.1002/dvdy.21454
Huang Z, Vijayaraghavan S (2004) Increased phosphorylation of a distinct subcellular pool of protein phosphatase, PP1gamma2, during epididymal sperm maturation. Biol Reprod 70(2):439–447. doi:10.1095/biolreprod.103.020024 biolreprod.103.020024[pii]
Hwang HY, Horvitz HR (2002) The SQV-1 UDP-glucuronic acid decarboxylase and the SQV-7 nucleotide-sugar transporter may act in the Golgi apparatus to affect Caenorhabditis elegans vulval morphogenesis and embryonic development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99(22):14218–14223. doi:10.1073/pnas.172522199
Italiano JE Jr, Roberts TM, Stewart M, Fontana CA (1996) Reconstitution in vitro of the motile apparatus from the amoeboid sperm of Ascaris shows that filament assembly and bundling move membranes. Cell 84(1):105–114. doi:S0092-8674(00)80997-6[pii]
Italiano JE Jr, Stewart M, Roberts TM (2001) How the assembly dynamics of the nematode major sperm protein generate amoeboid cell motility. Int Rev Cytol 202:1–34
Jenkins N, Saam JR, Mango SE (2006) CYK-4/GAP provides a localized cue to initiate anteroposterior polarity upon fertilization. Science 313(5791):1298–1301. doi:1130291[pii]10.1126/science.1130291
Johnston WL, Krizus A, Dennis JW (2006) The eggshell is required for meiotic fidelity, polar-body extrusion and polarization of the C. elegans embryo. BMC Biol 4:35. doi:1741-7007-4-35[pii]10.1186/1741-7007-4-35
Johnston WL, Krizus A, Dennis JW (2010) Eggshell chitin and chitin-interacting proteins prevent polyspermy in C. elegans. Curr Biol 20(21):1932–1937. doi:S0960-9822(10)01216-9[pii]10.1016/j.cub.2010.09.059
Kadandale P, Stewart-Michaelis A, Gordon S, Rubin J, Klancer R, Schweinsberg P, Grant BD, Singson A (2005) The egg surface LDL receptor repeat-containing proteins EGG-1 and EGG-2 are required for fertilization in Caenorhabditis elegans. Curr Biol 15(24):2222–2229. doi:S0960-9822(05)01296-0[pii]10.1016/j.cub.2005.10.043
Kaitna S, Mendoza M, Jantsch-Plunger V, Glotzer M (2000) Incenp and an aurora-like kinase form a complex essential for chromosome segregation and efficient completion of cytokinesis. Curr Biol 10(19):1172–1181. doi:S0960-9822(00)00721-1[pii]
Kim S, Spike CA, Greenstein D (2012) Control of oocyte growth and meiotic maturation in C. elegans. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 757:277–320. (Chap. 10, this volume) Springer, New York
Kimble J, Hirsh D (1979) The postembryonic cell lineages of the hermaphrodite and male gonads in Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol 70(2):396–417. doi:0012-1606(79)90035-6[pii]
King KL, Essig J, Roberts TM, Moerland TS (1994) Regulation of the Ascaris major sperm protein (MSP) cytoskeleton by intracellular pH. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 27(3):193–205. doi:10.1002/cm.970270302
Kiontke K, Fitch DH (2005) The phylogenetic relationships of Caenorhabditis and other rhabditids. WormBook:1–11. doi:10.1895/wormbook.1.11.1
Kiselyov K, Soyombo A, Muallem S (2007) TRPpathies. J Physiol 578(Pt 3):641–653. doi:jphysiol.2006.119024[pii]10.1113/jphysiol.2006.119024
Klass M, Wolf N, Hirsh D (1976) Development of the male reproductive system and sexual transformation in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol 52(1):1–18. doi:0012-1606(76)90002-6[pii]
Kosinski M, McDonald K, Schwartz J, Yamamoto I, Greenstein D (2005) C. elegans sperm bud vesicles to deliver a meiotic maturation signal to distant oocytes. Development 132(15):3357–3369. doi:dev.01916[pii]10.1242/dev.01916
Kroft TL, Gleason EJ, L’Hernault SW (2005) The spe-42 gene is required for sperm-egg interactions during C. elegans fertilization and encodes a sperm-specific transmembrane protein. Dev Biol 286(1):169–181. doi:S0012-1606(05)00476-8[pii]10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.07.020
Kubagawa HM, Watts JL, Corrigan C, Edmonds JW, Sztul E, Browse J, Miller MA (2006) Oocyte signals derived from polyunsaturated fatty acids control sperm recruitment in vivo. Nat Cell Biol 8(10):1143–1148. doi:ncb1476[pii]10.1038/ncb1476
LaMunyon CW, Ward S (1998) Larger sperm outcompete smaller sperm in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Biol Sci 265(1409):1997–2002. doi:10.1098/rspb.1998.0531
LeClaire LL 3rd, Stewart M, Roberts TM (2003) A 48 kDa integral membrane phosphoprotein orchestrates the cytoskeletal dynamics that generate amoeboid cell motility in Ascaris sperm. J Cell Sci 116(Pt 13):2655–2663. doi:10.1242/jcs.00469 jcs.00469[pii]
Lee MH, Schedl T (2001) Identification of in vivo mRNA targets of GLD-1, a maxi-KH motif containing protein required for C. elegans germ cell development. Genes Dev 15(18):2408–2420. doi:10.1101/gad.915901
L’Hernault SW (2006) Spermatogenesis. WormBook:1–14. doi:10.1895/wormbook.1.85.1
L’Hernault SW, Roberts TM (1995) Cell biology of nematode sperm. In: Caenorhabditis elegans: modern biological analysis of an organism, vol 48. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 273–301
L’Hernault SW, Shakes DC, Ward S (1988) Developmental genetics of chromosome I spermatogenesis-defective mutants in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 120(2):435–452
Liu J, Maller JL (2005) Calcium elevation at fertilization coordinates phosphorylation of XErp1/Emi2 by Plx1 and CaMK II to release metaphase arrest by cytostatic factor. Curr Biol 15(16):1458–1468. doi:S0960-9822(05)00774-8[pii]10.1016/j.cub.2005.07.030
Lu C, Mains PE (2007) The C. elegans anaphase promoting complex and MBK-2/DYRK kinase act redundantly with CUL-3/MEL-26 ubiquitin ligase to degrade MEI-1 microtubule-severing activity after meiosis. Dev Biol 302(2):438–447. doi:S0012-1606(06)01269-3[pii]10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.09.053
Madl JE, Herman RK (1979) Polyploids and sex determination in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 93(2):393–402
Maeda I, Kohara Y, Yamamoto M, Sugimoto A (2001) Large-scale analysis of gene function in Caenorhabditis elegans by high-throughput RNAi. Curr Biol 11(3):171–176. doi:S0960-9822(01)00052-5[pii]
Marcello MR, Singson A (2010) Fertilization and the oocyte-to-embryo transition in C. elegans. BMB Rep 43(6):389–399
Maruyama R, Velarde NV, Klancer R, Gordon S, Kadandale P, Parry JM, Hang JS, Rubin J, Stewart-Michaelis A, Schweinsberg P, Grant BD, Piano F, Sugimoto A, Singson A (2007) EGG-3 regulates cell-surface and cortex rearrangements during egg activation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Curr Biol 17(18):1555–1560. doi:S0960-9822(07)01787-3[pii]10.1016/j.cub.2007.08.011
Masui Y, Clarke HJ (1979) Oocyte maturation. Int Rev Cytol 57:185–282
McCarter J, Bartlett B, Dang T, Schedl T (1999) On the control of oocyte meiotic maturation and ovulation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol 205(1):111–128. doi:S0012-1606(98)99109-6[pii]10.1006/dbio.1998.9109
McNally KL, McNally FJ (2005) Fertilization initiates the transition from anaphase I to metaphase II during female meiosis in C. elegans. Dev Biol 282(1):218–230. doi:S0012-1606(05)00177-6[pii]10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.03.009
Mensah KA, Ritchlin CT, Schwarz EM (2010) RANKL induces heterogeneous DC-STAMP(lo) and DC-STAMP(hi) osteoclast precursors of which the DC-STAMP(lo) precursors are the master fusogens. J Cell Physiol 223(1):76–83. doi:10.1002/jcp. 22012
Miao L, Vanderlinde O, Stewart M, Roberts TM (2003) Retraction in amoeboid cell motility powered by cytoskeletal dynamics. Science 302(5649):1405–1407. doi:10.1126/science.1089129 302/5649/1405[pii]
Miller MA, Nguyen VQ, Lee MH, Kosinski M, Schedl T, Caprioli RM, Greenstein D (2001) A sperm cytoskeletal protein that signals oocyte meiotic maturation and ovulation. Science 291(5511):2144–2147. doi:10.1126/science.1057586 291/5511/2144[pii]
Miyamoto T (2006) The dendritic cell-specific transmembrane protein DC-STAMP is essential for osteoclast fusion and osteoclast bone-resorbing activity. Mod Rheumatol 16(6):341–342. doi:10.1007/s10165-006-0524-0
Mizushima N (2007) Autophagy: process and function. Genes Dev 21(22):2861–2873. doi:21/22/2861[pii]10.1101/gad.1599207
Morsci NS, Haas LA, Barr MM (2011) Sperm status regulates sexual attraction in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. doi:genetics.111.133603[pii]10.1534/genetics.111.133603
Nakatogawa H, Suzuki K, Kamada Y, Ohsumi Y (2009) Dynamics and diversity in autophagy mechanisms: lessons from yeast. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 10(7):458–467. doi:nrm2708[pii]10.1038/nrm2708
Nigon V, Dougherty EC (1949) Reproductive patterns and attempts at reciprocal crossing of Rhabditis elegans Maupas, 1900, and Rhabditis briggsae Dougherty and Nigon, 1949 (Nematoda: Rhabditidae). J Exp Zool 112(3):485–503
Nishi Y, Rogers E, Robertson SM, Lin R (2008) Polo kinases regulate C. elegans embryonic polarity via binding to DYRK2-primed MEX-5 and MEX-6. Development 135(4):687–697. doi:dev.013425[pii]10.1242/dev.013425
Nishimura H, L’Hernault SW (2010) Spermatogenesis-defective (spe) mutants of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans provide clues to solve the puzzle of male germline functions during reproduction. Dev Dyn 239(5):1502–1514. doi:10.1002/dvdy.22271
Nykjaer A, Willnow TE (2002) The low-density lipoprotein receptor gene family: a cellular Swiss army knife? Trends Cell Biol 12(6):273–280. doi:S0962892402022821[pii]
O’Connell KF, Maxwell KN, White JG (2000) The spd-2 gene is required for polarization of the anteroposterior axis and formation of the sperm asters in the Caenorhabditis elegans zygote. Dev Biol 222(1):55–70. doi:S0012-1606(00)99714-8[pii]10.1006/dbio.2000.9714
Olson SK, Bishop JR, Yates JR, Oegema K, Esko JD (2006) Identification of novel chondroitin proteoglycans in Caenorhabditis elegans: embryonic cell division depends on CPG-1 and CPG-2. J Cell Biol 173(6):985–994. doi:jcb.200603003[pii]10.1083/jcb.200603003
Oppedisano L, Haines G, Hrabchak C, Fimia G, Elliott R, Sassone-Corsi P, Varmuza S (2002) The rate of aneuploidy is altered in spermatids from infertile mice. Hum Reprod 17(3):710–717
Pang KM, Ishidate T, Nakamura K, Shirayama M, Trzepacz C, Schubert CM, Priess JR, Mello CC (2004) The minibrain kinase homolog, mbk-2, is required for spindle positioning and asymmetric cell division in early C. elegans embryos. Dev Biol 265(1):127–139. doi:S0012160603005761[pii]
Parry JM, Singson A (2011) EGG molecules couple the oocyte-to-embryo transition with cell cycle progression. Results Probl Cell Differ 53:135–151. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-19065-0_7
Parry JM, Velarde NV, Lefkovith AJ, Zegarek MH, Hang JS, Ohm J, Klancer R, Maruyama R, Druzhinina MK, Grant BD, Piano F, Singson A (2009) EGG-4 and EGG-5 link events of the oocyte-to-embryo transition with meiotic progression in C. elegans. Curr Biol 19(20):1752–1757. doi:S0960-9822(09)01692-3[pii]10.1016/j.cub.2009.09.015
Pelletier L, O’Toole E, Schwager A, Hyman AA, Muller-Reichert T (2006) Centriole assembly in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 444(7119):619–623. doi:nature05318[pii]10.1038/nature05318
Pellettieri J, Reinke V, Kim SK, Seydoux G (2003) Coordinate activation of maternal protein degradation during the egg-to-embryo transition in C. elegans. Dev Cell 5(3):451–462. doi:S1534580703002314[pii]
Portereiko MF, Mango SE (2001) Early morphogenesis of the Caenorhabditis elegans pharynx. Dev Biol 233(2):482–494. doi:10.1006/dbio.2001.0235 S0012-1606(01)90235-0[pii]
Portereiko MF, Saam J, Mango SE (2004) ZEN-4/MKLP1 is required to polarize the foregut epithelium. Curr Biol 14(11):932–941. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2004.05.052 S0960982204003872[pii]
Putiri E, Zannoni S, Kadandale P, Singson A (2004) Functional domains and temperature-sensitive mutations in SPE-9, an EGF repeat-containing protein required for fertility in Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol 272(2):448–459. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.05.014 S0012160604003586[pii]
Quintin S, Mains PE, Zinke A, Hyman AA (2003) The mbk-2 kinase is required for inactivation of MEI-1/katanin in the one-cell Caenorhabditis elegans embryo. EMBO Rep 4(12):1175–1181. doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7400029 7400029[pii]
Rappleye CA, Paredez AR, Smith CW, McDonald KL, Aroian RV (1999) The coronin-like protein POD-1 is required for anterior-posterior axis formation and cellular architecture in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Genes Dev 13(21):2838–2851
Rauh NR, Schmidt A, Bormann J, Nigg EA, Mayer TU (2005) Calcium triggers exit from meiosis II by targeting the APC/C inhibitor XErp1 for degradation. Nature 437(7061):1048–1052. doi:nature04093[pii]10.1038/nature04093
Roberts TM, Stewart M (2000) Acting like actin. The dynamics of the nematode major sperm protein (msp) cytoskeleton indicate a push-pull mechanism for amoeboid cell motility. J Cell Biol 149(1):7–12
Roberts TM, Streitmatter G (1984) Membrane-substrate contact under the spermatozoon of Caenorhabditis elegans, a crawling cell that lacks filamentous actin. J Cell Sci 69:117–126
Roberts TM, Ward S (1982) Centripetal flow of pseudopodial surface components could propel the amoeboid movement of Caenorhabditis elegans spermatozoa. J Cell Biol 92(1):132–138
Robertson S, Lin R (2012) The oocyte-to-embryo transition. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, 757:351–372. (Chap. 12, this volume) Springer, New York
Samuel AD, Murthy VN, Hengartner MO (2001) Calcium dynamics during fertilization in C. elegans. BMC Dev Biol 1:8
Sato M, Sato K (2011) Degradation of paternal mitochondria by fertilization-triggered autophagy in C. elegans embryos. Science. doi:science.1210333[pii]10.1126/science.1210333
Sato M, Grant BD, Harada A, Sato K (2008) Rab11 is required for synchronous secretion of chondroitin proteoglycans after fertilization in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Cell Sci 121(Pt 19):3177–3186. doi:jcs.034678[pii]10.1242/jcs.034678
Schubert CM, Lin R, de Vries CJ, Plasterk RH, Priess JR (2000) MEX-5 and MEX-6 function to establish soma/germline asymmetry in early C. elegans embryos. Mol Cell 5(4):671–682. doi:S1097-2765(00)80246-4[pii]
Seidel HS, Rockman MV, Kruglyak L (2008) Widespread genetic incompatibility in C. elegans maintained by balancing selection. Science 319(5863):589–594. doi:1151107[pii]10.1126/science.1151107
Seidel HS, Ailion M, Li J, van Oudenaarden A, Rockman MV, Kruglyak L (2011) A novel sperm-delivered toxin causes late-stage embryo lethality and transmission ratio distortion in C. elegans. PLoS Biol 9(7):e1001115. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001115 PBIOLOGY-D-10-00587[pii]
Shakes DC, Ward S (1989) Initiation of spermiogenesis in C. elegans: a pharmacological and genetic analysis. Dev Biol 134(1):189–200. doi:0012-1606(89)90088-2[pii]
Shakes DC, Allen AK, Albert KM, Golden A (2011) emb-1 encodes the APC16 subunit of the Caenorhabditis elegans anaphase-promoting complex. Genetics 189(2):549–560. doi:genetics.111.131714[pii]10.1534/genetics.111.131714
Shimabukuro K, Noda N, Stewart M, Roberts TM (2011) Reconstitution of amoeboid motility in vitro identifies a motor-independent mechanism for cell body retraction. Curr Biol. doi:S0960-9822(11)00953-5[pii]10.1016/j.cub.2011.08.047
Singaravelu G, Singson A (2011) New insights into the mechanism of fertilization in nematodes. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol 289:211–238. doi:B9780123860392000067[pii]10.1016/B978-0-12-386039-2.00006-7
Singaravelu G, Chatterjee I, Rahimi S, Druzhinina MK, Kang L, Xu XZ, Singson A (2012) The sperm surface localization of the TRP-3/SPE-41 Ca(2+)-permeable channel depends on SPE-38 function in Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol 365(2):376–383
Singson A (2001) Every sperm is sacred: fertilization in Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol 230(2):101–109. doi:10.1006/dbio.2000.0118 S0012-1606(00)90118-0[pii]
Singson A, Mercer KB, L’Hernault SW (1998) The C. elegans spe-9 gene encodes a sperm transmembrane protein that contains EGF-like repeats and is required for fertilization. Cell 93(1):71–79. doi:S0092-8674(00)81147-2[pii]
Singson A, Hang JS, Parry JM (2008) Genes required for the common miracle of fertilization in Caenorhabditis elegans. Int J Dev Biol 52(5–6):647–656. doi:072512as[pii]10.1387/ijdb.072512as
Siomos MF, Badrinath A, Pasierbek P, Livingstone D, White J, Glotzer M, Nasmyth K (2001) Separase is required for chromosome segregation during meiosis I in Caenorhabditis elegans. Curr Biol 11(23):1825–1835. doi:S0960-9822(01)00588-7[pii]
Smith H (2006) Sperm motility and MSP. WormBook:1–8. doi:10.1895/wormbook.1.68.1
Soler DC, Kadunganattil S, Ramdas S, Myers K, Roca J, Slaughter T, Pilder SH, Vijayaraghavan S (2009) Expression of transgenic PPP1CC2 in the testis of Ppp 1 cc-null mice rescues spermatid viability and spermiation but does not restore normal sperm tail ultrastructure, sperm motility, or fertility. Biol Reprod 81(2):343–352. doi:biolreprod.109.076398[pii]10.1095/biolreprod.109.076398
Stanfield GM, Villeneuve AM (2006) Regulation of sperm activation by SWM-1 is required for reproductive success of C. elegans males. Curr Biol 16(3):252–263. doi:S0960-9822(06)01024-4[pii]10.1016/j.cub.2005.12.041
Stitzel ML, Seydoux G (2007) Regulation of the oocyte-to-zygote transition. Science 316(5823):407–408. doi:316/5823/407[pii]10.1126/science.1138236
Stitzel ML, Pellettieri J, Seydoux G (2006) The C. elegans DYRK kinase MBK-2 marks oocyte proteins for degradation in response to meiotic maturation. Curr Biol 16(1):56–62. doi:S0960-9822(05)01473-9[pii]10.1016/j.cub.2005.11.063
Stitzel ML, Cheng KC, Seydoux G (2007) Regulation of MBK-2/Dyrk kinase by dynamic cortical anchoring during the oocyte-to-zygote transition. Curr Biol 17(18):1545–1554. doi:S0960-9822(07)01905-7[pii]10.1016/j.cub.2007.08.049
Sudhaus W, Kiontke K (2007) Comparison of the cryptic nematode species Caenorhabditis brenneri sp. n. and C. remanei (Nematoda: Rhabditidae) with stem species pattern of the Caenorhabditis Elegans group. Zootaxa 1456:45–62
Sudhaus S, Fricke B, Schneider S, Stachon A, Klein H, von During M, Hasenbring M (2007) [The cortisol awakening response in patients with acute and chronic low back pain. Relations with psychological risk factors of pain chronicity]. Schmerz 21(3):202–204, 206–211. doi:10.1007/s00482-006-0521-4
Tunquist BJ, Schwab MS, Chen LG, Maller JL (2002) The spindle checkpoint kinase bub1 and cyclin e/cdk2 both contribute to the establishment of meiotic metaphase arrest by cytostatic factor. Curr Biol 12(12):1027–1033. doi:S0960982202008941[pii]
Tsukamoto S, Kuma A, Murakami M, Kishi C, Yamamoto A, Mizushima N (2008) Autophagy is essential for preimplantation development of mouse embryos. Science 321(5885):117–120. doi:321/5885/117[pii]10.1126/science.1154822
Varkey JP, Jansma PL, Minniti AN, Ward S (1993) The Caenorhabditis elegans spe-6 gene is required for major sperm protein assembly and shows second site non-complementation with an unlinked deficiency. Genetics 133(1):79–86
Varmuza S, Jurisicova A, Okano K, Hudson J, Boekelheide K, Shipp EB (1999) Spermiogenesis is impaired in mice bearing a targeted mutation in the protein phosphatase 1cgamma gene. Dev Biol 205(1):98–110. doi:S0012-1606(98)99100-X[pii]10.1006/dbio.1998.9100
Veronico P, Gray LJ, Jones JT, Bazzicalupo P, Arbucci S, Cortese MR, Di Vito M, De Giorgi C (2001) Nematode chitin synthases: gene structure, expression and function in Caenorhabditis elegans and the plant parasitic nematode Meloidogyne artiellia. Mol Genet Genomics 266(1):28–34
Wallenfang MR, Seydoux G (2000) Polarization of the anterior-posterior axis of C. elegans is a microtubule-directed process. Nature 408(6808):89–92. doi:10.1038/35040562
Wang T, Jiao Y, Montell C (2005) Dissecting independent channel and scaffolding roles of the Drosophila transient receptor potential channel. J Cell Biol 171(4):685–694. doi:jcb.200508030[pii]10.1083/jcb.200508030
Ward S, Carrel JS (1979) Fertilization and sperm competition in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol 73(2):304–321
Ward S, Hogan E, Nelson GA (1983) The initiation of spermiogenesis in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol 98(1):70–79. doi:0012-1606(83)90336-6[pii]
Watts JL, Browse J (2002) Genetic dissection of polyunsaturated fatty acid synthesis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99(9):5854–5859. doi:10.1073/pnas.092064799 092064799[pii]
Wessel GM, Brooks JM, Green E, Haley S, Voronina E, Wong J, Zaydfudim V, Conner S (2001) The biology of cortical granules. Int Rev Cytol 209:117–206
Wilson LD, Sackett JM, Mieczkowski BD, Richie AL, Thoemke K, Rumbley JN, Kroft TL (2011) Fertilization in C. elegans requires an intact C-terminal RING finger in sperm protein SPE-42. BMC Dev Biol 11:10. doi:1471-213X-11-10[pii]10.1186/1471-213X-11-10
Wu JC, Go AC, Samson M, Cintra T, Mirsoian S, Wu TF, Jow MM, Routman EJ, Chu DS (2011) PP1 phosphatases regulate multiple stages of sperm development and motility in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. doi:genetics.111.135376[pii]10.1534/genetics.111.135376
Xie Z, Klionsky DJ (2007) Autophagosome formation: core machinery and adaptations. Nat Cell Biol 9(10):1102–1109. doi:ncb1007-1102[pii]10.1038/ncb1007-1102
Xu XZ, Sternberg PW (2003) A C. elegans sperm TRP protein required for sperm-egg interactions during fertilization. Cell 114(3):285–297. doi:S0092867403005658[pii]
Yamamoto I, Kosinski ME, Greenstein D (2006) Start me up: cell signaling and the journey from oocyte to embryo in C. elegans. Dev Dyn 235(3):571–585. doi:10.1002/dvdy.20662
Yi K, Buttery SM, Stewart M, Roberts TM (2007) A Ser/Thr kinase required for membrane-associated assembly of the major sperm protein motility apparatus in the amoeboid sperm of Ascaris. Mol Biol Cell 18(5):1816–1825. doi:E06-08-0741[pii]10.1091/mbc.E06-08-0741
Yi K, Wang X, Emmett MR, Marshall AG, Stewart M, Roberts TM (2009) Dephosphorylation of major sperm protein (MSP) fiber protein 3 by protein phosphatase 2A during cell body retraction in the MSP-based amoeboid motility of Ascaris sperm. Mol Biol Cell 20(14):3200–3208. doi:E09-03-0240[pii]10.1091/mbc.E09-03-0240
Zanetti S, Puoti A (2012) Sex determination in the C. elegans germline. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 757:41–69. (Chap. 3, this volume) Springer, New York
Zannoni S, L’Hernault SW, Singson AW (2003) Dynamic localization of SPE-9 in sperm: a protein required for sperm-oocyte interactions in Caenorhabditis elegans. BMC Dev Biol 3:10. doi:10.1186/1471-213X-3-10 1471-213X-3-10[pii]
Zhang Y, Foster JM, Nelson LS, Ma D, Carlow CK (2005) The chitin synthase genes chs-1 and chs-2 are essential for C. elegans development and responsible for chitin deposition in the eggshell and pharynx, respectively. Dev Biol 285(2):330–339. doi:S0012-1606(05)00443-4[pii]10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.06.037
Acknowledgments
We thank the anonymous reviewers and Drs. Tim Schedl, Diane Shakes, and David Greenstein for their helpful comments and suggestions. We also thank the members of the Singson laboratory, Roopa Kalyanaraman Marcello, and Dr. Sara K. Olson for critical comments and editorial assistance. This work was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health to AS [R01HD054681-06]. MRM is a UMDNJ-RWJMS IRACDA Postdoctoral Fellow supported by NIH Grant GM093854.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Marcello, M.R., Singaravelu, G., Singson, A. (2013). Fertilization. In: Schedl, T. (eds) Germ Cell Development in C. elegans. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 757. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4015-4_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4015-4_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-4014-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-4015-4
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)