Skip to main content

Three Types of Risk Assessment: A Methodological Analysis

  • Chapter
Risk Analysis in the Private Sector

Part of the book series: Advances in Risk Analysis ((AEMB,volume 220))

Abstract

The study of risks and the impact of new technological systems in our society and environment is now accepted as a legitimate subject of research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Footnotes

  1. C. Mandl and J. Lathrop, “Comparing Risk Assessments for Liquefied Gas Terminals - Some Results”. In The Risk Analysis Controversy. An Institutional Perspective, H. Kunreuther and E.V. Ley (eds.) (Springer-Verlag, 1982) pp. 42–43.

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. Starr, “Social Benefit Versus Technological Risk,” Science, Vol. 165, 19 Sept. 1969, pp. 1232–1238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. G. Apostolakis, “Probability and Risk Assessment: The Subjectivist Viewpoint and Some Suggestions,” Nuclear Safety, Vol. 19, No. 3, May-June 1978, pp 305 – 315.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Risk and Decision Making: Perspectives and Research. Committee on Risk and Decision Making Assembly of Behavioral and Social Sciences, National Research Council, National Academic Press, Washington, DC, 1982, p. 61.

    Google Scholar 

  5. G.N. Parry and D.W. Winter, “Characterization and Evaluation of Uncertainty in Probability Risk Analysis,” Nuclear Safety, Vol. 22, No. 1, January-February 1981, pp. 28 – 42.

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. Okrent, “A Survey of Expert Opinion on Low Probability Earthquakes,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2, 1975, pp. 601 – 614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. “The Axman and Nuclear Power,” (Leader) New York Times, 20 March 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  8. “Nuclear Incompetence,” New Scientist, 19 May 1983, p. 434.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J.R. Ravetz, “The Safety of Safeguards,” Minerva, Vol. XII, No. 3, July 1974, pp. 323 – 325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kaplan and B.J. Garrick, “On the Quantitative Definition of Risk,” Risk Analysis, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1981, p. 12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. B. Wolfe, “Is the Energy Debate Really About Energy?”, IAEA Bulletin, Vol. 24, No. 4, 1983, pp. 28 – 32.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Hollis and S. Lukes (eds.), “Rationality and Relativism,” B. Blackwell, Oxford, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Douglas and A. Wildavsky, Risk and Culture, University of California, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J.M. Ziman, Public Knowledge, Cambridge U.P., 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. Tye, “On the Safety Beat”, Safety(London), February 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Health and Safety Executive. “Canvey: An Investigation of Potential Hazards from Operations in the Canvey Island/ Thurrock Area,” 1978, and “Canvey: A Second Report,” 1981 ( London: HMSO).

    Google Scholar 

  17. J.R. Ravetz, “The Political Economy of Risk,” New Scientist, 8 September 1977, pp. 26 – 27.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Funtowicz, S.O., Ravetz, J.R. (1985). Three Types of Risk Assessment: A Methodological Analysis. In: Whipple, C., Covello, V.T. (eds) Risk Analysis in the Private Sector. Advances in Risk Analysis, vol 220. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2465-2_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2465-2_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-9496-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-2465-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics