Skip to main content

Explaining and Justifying Expert Consulting Programs

  • Chapter
Computer-Assisted Medical Decision Making

Part of the book series: Computers and Medicine ((C+M))

Abstract

Traditional methods for explaining programs provide explanations by converting to English the code of the program or traces of the execution of that code. While such methods can provide adequate explanations of what the program does or did, they typically cannot provide justifications of the code without resorting to canned-text explanations. That is, such systems cannot tell why what the system is doing is a reasonable thing to be doing. The problem is that the knowledge required to provide these justifications is needed only when the program is being written and does not appear in the code itself.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barstow, D., “A Knowledge-Based System for Automatic Program Construction,” Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  2. Balzer, R., Goldman, N., Wile, D., “Informality in Program Specifications,” Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  3. Clancey, W.J., “Transfer of Rule-based Expertise Through a Tutorial Dialogue,” Stanford University, Department of Computer Science, STAN-CS-79-769, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  4. Davis, R., “Applications of Meta Level Knowledge to the Construction, Maintenance and Use of Large Knowledge Bases,” PhD thesis, Stanford Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Memo 283(1976).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gorry, G.A., Silverman, H., and Pauker, S.G., Capturing Clinical Expertise: A Computer Program that Considers Clinical Responses to Digitalis, American Journal of Medicine 64: 452 – 460, (March 1978).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Green, C.C., Gabriel, R.P., Kant, E., Kedzierski, B.I., McCune, B.P., Phillips, J.V., Tappel, S.T., Westfold, S.J., “[Green79]Results in Knowledge Based Program Synthesis,” Proceedings of the Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jelliffe R.W., Buell J., Kalaba R. et al, “A Computer Program for Digitalis Dosage Regimens,” Math. Biosci.9: 179 – 193, 1970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jelliffe R.W., Buell J, Kalaba R, “Reduction of digitalis toxicity by computer-assisted glycoside dosage regimens,” Ann. Intern. Med.77: 891 – 906, 1972

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Long, W.J., “A Program Writer,” MIT Laboratory for Computer Science, TR-187, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  10. Manna, Z., Waldinger, R., “ The Automatic Synthesis of Systems of Recursive Programs,” Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  11. Peck C.C., Sheiner L.B. et al: “ Computer-assisted Digoxin Therapy,” New England Journal of Medicine289: 441 – 446, 1973.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pauker, S.G., Gorry, G.A., Kassirer, J.P., and Schwartz. W.B., “Toward the Simulation of Clinical Cognition: Taking a Present Illness by Computer,” The American Journal of Medicine60: 981 – 995 (June 1976).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pople, H.E., Jr., “The Formation of Composite Hypotheses in Diagnostic Problem Solving: an Exercise in Synthetic Reasoning,” Proceedings of the Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sheiner L.B., Rosenberg B., Melmon K., “[Sheiner72]Modelling of Individual Pharmacokinetics for Computer-aided Drug Dosage,” Computers and Biomedical Research5: 441 – 459, 1972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shortliffe, E.H., Computer Based Medical Consultations: MYCIN, Elsevier North Holland Inc. (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Silverman, H., “A Digitalis Therapy Advisor,” MIT Project MAC TR-143, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  17. Swartout, W.R., “A Digitalis Therapy Advisor with Explanations,” Proceedings of the Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, August 1977

    Google Scholar 

  18. Swartout, W.R., “A Digitalis Therapy Advisor with Explanations,” Proceedings of the Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, August 1977

    Google Scholar 

  19. Winograd, T., “A Computer Program for Understanding Natural Language,” MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory TR-17, 1971

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 Springer-Verlag New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Swartout, W.R. (1985). Explaining and Justifying Expert Consulting Programs. In: Reggia, J.A., Tuhrim, S. (eds) Computer-Assisted Medical Decision Making. Computers and Medicine. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5108-8_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5108-8_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-9567-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-5108-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics