Abstract
Percutaneous coronary intervention is the preferred contemporary revascularization therapeutic approach for patients who sustain acute myocardial infarction. An integral component of revascularization tools the user -friendly laser offers several unique advantages which enhance the efficacy of PCI in this critical clinical scenario. Basic research demonstrates that the interaction between laser emission and bio tissues uniquely effects two critical pathophysiologic components of AMI: the ruptured atherosclerotic plaque and its accompanying thrombus. The marked precision of the laser energy permits transformation of the irradiated plaque into microscopic particles while its acoustic shock waves mechanically destroy the intra-thrombus’ fibrin fibers system. Consequently, adequate clot dissolution ensues. The laser further improves the treatment of AMI through a significant inhibitory effect on the aggregation kinetics of the platelets adhering to the plaque. Clinical studies of various wavelength lasers in the setting of AMI repeatedly demonstrate laser induced expedient recanalization and adequate restoration of optimal antegrade flow in the infarct related vessel. Technically, the shallow penetration depth of the excimer laser (35–50 μm) indicates that lasing should be performed with emphasis on slow advancement of the irradiating catheter (0.2–0.5 mm/s) enabling proper energy deposition and optimal absorption onto the targeted plaque and thrombus. Laser activation is performed with concomitant saline injections into the vessel, and should only be initiated after complete dye removal from the treated vessel. This avoids unwarranted amplification of the laser generated acoustic shock waves from the contrast dye. Strategically, the precision of laser induced plaque vaporization and effective thrombus dissolution render the placement of distal protection devices unnecessary. Altogether, the use of laser assisted percutaneous revascularization in AMI is associated with very high success rates, especially in complex plaques and heavy thrombus burden, and with a considerably low complication rate.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Laser
- Excimer
- Acute myocardial infarction
- Coronary artery disease
- Bypass graft
- Revascularization
- PCI
- Platelets
Background
Atherosclerotic coronary plaque rupture and subsequent thrombus formation are the main pathophysiologic processes that account for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the contemporary optimal reperfusion therapy for management of AMI, especially in patients presenting with either STEMI (S-T Elevation Myocardial Infarction) or with evolving non-STEMI (NSTEMI) and those requiring rescue intervention post failure of initial administration of thrombolytic agents [1, 2]. A PCI based AMI revascularization reduces the rate of death, stroke and re-infarction when compared with the long standing strategy that relied on select fibrinolytic agents as the first line therapy [3]. However, while many lesions treated by PCI in AMI require only standard balloons and stents, a complex morphology of the offensive plaque, especially with thrombotic content, frequently necessitates a dedicated lesion-specific approach [4]. This calls for utilization of specific devices that provide adequate plaque debulking and thrombus extraction [4, 5] and facilitate resistant-free delivery and precise deployment of intracoronary stents [5–7]. Hence, laser offers a reliable, user-friendly technology which has been successfully applied in select AMI patients. The treatment targets include atherosclerotic and thrombotic plaques, in-stent restenosis and chronic total occlusions occupying infarct related vessels such as coronary arteries and degenerated saphenous vein bypass grafts [8]. When optimal thrombus removal during PCI for AMI mandates incorporation of mechanical thrombectomy devices [9, 10], the laser energy becomes a valid option as lasers are recognized for their dual capabilities of performing simultaneously precision plaque debulking and thrombus removal [11–13]. Altogether, this chapter aims to provide comprehensive report on the vast experience which had been gained with the use of laser during AMI interventions along the last two decades. It reviews the current criteria for use of the laser, describes the catheter technology, comments on the effective and safe lasing techniques and presents analysis of the results of pivotal clinical laser studies.
The Evolution of Laser Revascularization in AMI
The introduction of laser for PCI in AMI was initially reported in 1993 when a mid-infrared, solid-state, pulse-wave holmium: YAG (2.1 μm wave length) was first used by Eduardo de Marchena and colleagues in three patients at the Jackson Memorial Medical center of the University of Miami, Florida [14]. Another early experience in nine patients who sustained complicated AMI and needed urgent percutaneous intervention was reported by interventionalists from the St. Paul Ramsey hospital of the University of Minnesota [12]. Successful revascularization and excellent clinical outcome were observed in that small series of patients. The issue of proper lasing technique during revascularization for AMI cannot be underestimated. Noteworthy, in the early experience with coronary laser angioplasty, the recommended lasing technique relied upon rapid catheter advancement and continuous energy delivery mode of energy. Over time however, operators began to realize that this method frequently induced vessel and plaque complications. Thus, the technique was subsequently replaced to incorporate slow catheter advancement and intermittent lasing emission [15]. This modification reduced the rate and scope of laser related complications, and, consequently, enabled further exploration of the use of laser [mainly the dye, holmium:YAG and xenon chloride] in urgent percutaneous AMI revascularization covering the entire spectrum of acute ischemic coronary syndromes [16, 17]. To date, this technique remains safe and efficacious in coronary and peripheral applications alike.
Noteworthy, both the dye and the Holmium: YAG mid-infrared wavelength lasers were considered reliable revascularization tools [18, 19], however, they are no longer in common use in the US. The ultraviolet 308 nm excimer laser [CVX-300, Spectranetics, Colorado Springs, Colorado, US] thus remains the dominant system wavelength available for cardiovascular interventions in the US and globally. This laser is FDA approved [for physician’s discretionary use] in acute coronary syndromes such as unstable angina (Fig. 4.1), the STEMI (Figs. 4.2, 4.3, and 4.4) and the non STEMI type of AMI (Figs. 4.5 and 4.6) [8, 20, 21]. Currently, the excimer laser enables AMI revascularization for targeted thrombus and plaque debulking in native coronary arteries and old saphenous vein grafts alike [8, 20]. Overall, the excimer laser has been shown as an efficient and safe technology for the treatment of challenging, high risk coronary lesions such as left main stenosis, stent restenosis, ostial lesions, arterial and saphenous vein bypass grafts stenoses and chronic total occlusions [21–23]. Noteworthy, this laser is also used for revascularization in acute, chronic and critical peripheral arterial disease with target lesions located in the superficial femoral, popliteal, subclavian and renal arteries [24]. Table 4.1 summarizes the current clinical and angiographic criteria for utilization of laser in the management of AMI.
Technical Characteristics of Cardiovascular Lasers
The pulsed-wave excimer [Xenon Chloride] laser operates at 308 nm wavelength with a pulse duration of 135 ns and output of 200 mJ/pulse. The laser energy is delivered via either over-the-wire or rapid exchange catheters containing flexible optic fibers. The modern laser catheters have improved fiber array with concentric or eccentric tip configuration [25]. Table 4.2 displays the technologic profile of coronary excimer laser catheters which are used in PCI for AMI.
Experiments with Laser- Tissue Effects Pertinent to PCI for AMI
The excimer laser energy interacts with the nonaqueous components of the atherosclerotic plaque [proteins, nucleic acids]. Absorption within atheromatous plaques and thrombotic material results in initiation of photomechanical and photothermal processes that lead to vaporization [26]. Laser activation generates acoustic shock waves which mechanically break and dissolve fibrin fibers, a major constituent of thrombus [27] and considerably suppresses platelet aggregation [28] (Fig. 4.7). A series of in vitro experiments studied the effect of laser emission on thrombolytics, providing strong evidence that laser energy significantly enhances fibrinolysis in fibrin clots initially treated by t-PA. Moreover, despite the known decline in the rate of t-PA induced fibrinolysis with increasing clot age, application of laser energy results in significant enhancement of fibrinolysis [29]. Table 4.3 describes basic research phenomena related to laser activation and their clinical manifestations as pertaining to revascularization in AMI.
Clinical Outcome of Laser Application in AMI
The last two decades led to growing experience with the utilization of excimer laser for revascularization in stable and unstable angina patients who present with a spectrum of hemodynamic conditions, particularly in AMI [32, 33]. Table 4.4 presents the main findings originating from studies of laser application in AMI. It is well established that patients presenting within the first 2–3 h of STEMI commonly exhibit a less complex plaque morphology and smaller thrombus burden compared to patients arriving late; either 5–6 h or even later arrivals such as 12–24 h after the onset of the AMI. Thus, an intriguing practical question arose as to what would be the effect of laser during every stage of evolving AMI. Consequently, investigators set forth to explore the laser outcome not only during the early, acute phase of STEMI but also in later phases of AMI. Accordingly, the pivotal, all-comers CARMEL (Cohort of Acute Revascularization in Myocardial Infarction by Excimer Laser) study was launched [21]. The project entailed an investigator sponsored, international, multicenter study enrolling 151 patients in various stages of evolving AMI who were treated in 8 laser experienced facilities in the US, Canada and Germany. While many of the study’s patients presented within the first few hours of STEMI, other patients who were late arrivals (later than 6 h after chest pain onset), patients who failed to respond to thrombolytic agents, those with cardiogenic shock (21 %), and infarct related lesions in degenerated saphenous vein grafts (26 %) were intentionally included to ensure maximal clinical challenge for the laser technology. Thus the intention to enroll every type of AMI offered real life representation of different clinical scenarios. This approach contrasted considerably with the more restricted, leading studies of PCI in AMI. To complement the study’s high standards, the quantitative and statistical analyses were performed by the independent core laboratories of Stanford university, Palo Alto, California and Duke university, Raleigh, North Carolina, respectively. The baseline angiographic left ventriculography demonstrated left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 44 ± 13 % (normal >55 %). Then a large proportion (74 %) of the patients presented critical stenosis of the infarct related vessel (95–100 % stenosis). Specifically, total occlusion (100 % stenosis marked by TIMI 0 flow) was present in 37 % of the patients. These critical occlusions were caused by plaques with significant thrombus burden, a common finding in many AMI patients [35]. Accordingly, a large thrombus burden-TIMI thrombus grade of 3 or 4 was detected in as many as 65 % of the cases. For the laser revascularization, small-size catheters (0.9 and 1.4 mm) were the first tool in 34 % of the lesions whereas larger size catheters (1.7 and 2.0 mm) were used initially in 66 %. The final laser catheter size was 2.0 mm in 23 % of the lesions, 1.7 mm in 43 %, 1.4 mm in 25 % and 0.9 mm in 9 %. By visual angiographic assessment the baseline stenosis of 95 ± 6 % was decreased by laser emission to 48 ± 23 % (p < 0.001), followed by further decrease as achieved with balloon and stenting, to a final of 3 ± 9 % (p < 0.001 versus baseline and post laser). The markedly low baseline TIMI flow of 1.2 ± 1.1 increased significantly by the excimer laser to grade 2.8 ± 0.5 (p < 0.001), reaching a final post stenting TIMI grade of 3.0 ± 0.2 (p < 0.001 vs. baseline). The minimal luminal diameter (MLD) of the treated vessels increased with the application of laser emission from a baseline of 0.5 ± 0.5 to 1.6 ± 0.5 mm (mean ± SD, p < 0.001), reaching a final 2.7 ± 0.6 mm after adjunct stenting (baseline vs. post laser, p < 0.001). A 95 % device success, 97 % angiographic success and an overall 91 % procedural success rate were reported. A total of 6 patients (4 %) died, each arrived to the emergency room already in a state of cardiogenic shock. Admittedly, while the study was not powered to examine the role of laser in cardiogenic shock, intriguingly among the 20 patients who presented in this devastating hemodynamic condition there was a relatively low post procedure mortality rate of 30 %, suggesting that the laser might have had a positive impact on survival. The markedly low rate of complications included 0.6 % perforation, 5 % major dissection (all managed successfully with stent), 0.6 % acute closure, 3 % bleeding and 2 % distal embolization. The investigators discovered that the maximal gain in effective removal of the targeted thrombi was directly proportional to the initial angiographic burden, i.e. the larger the thrombotic content, the higher the laser effectiveness. This crucial finding corroborated earlier studies which recorded successful removal of 80 % of the initial thrombotic burden [35].
Overall, the CARMEL study provided the first quantitative sound evidence demonstrating the successful yield of mechanical thrombectomy devices as applied in PCI for AMI. When further sub-analysis of the study was performed the investigators found that a specific laser related gain was achieved in those who presented later than the optimal 6 h window after AMI onset [34]. Another analysis focused on the challenging sub-group of AMI patients presenting with complete (100 %) occlusion of the infarct related artery. In most of these patients the critical TIMI flow grade 0 was attributed to the combined effect of an underlying plaque and a heavy burden, TIMI grade 5 thrombus. Nevertheless, despite the unfavorable baseline clinical condition and the heavy thrombus load in this selective group, an 89 % laser success rate was achieved as well as 93 % angiographic success and 86 % overall procedural success. Noteworthy, the baseline TIMI 0 flow increased to grade 2.7 ± 0.5 with the laser (p < 0.001). Then the final, post stenting TIMI flow was grade 3.0 ± 0.2 (p < 0.001 vs. baseline). The rate of complications in this study was considerably low. Distal embolization occurred in only 4 %, a rate serving as a testimony to the reliability of the laser in complex lesions. The “no reflow” phenomenon was detected in 2 %, target vessel dissection in 4 % [lower rate than in standard balloon angioplasty] and perforation occurred in only 0.6 %. The total MACE of 13 % was considered a low rate [37]. Another challenging, high risk sub-group of the CARMEL study patients included 31 subjects whose saphenous vein graft was the infarct related vessel [36]. Unsurprisingly, 39 % of these patients exhibited total occlusion of the old graft (TIMI 0 flow) and 23 % had sub-total (95–99 %) stenosis. Despite the morphologic and thrombotic challenge, the laser was able to increased the minimal luminal diameter in these vessels from a baseline of 0.6 ± 0.6 to 1.6 ± 0.5 mm and facilitated stent deployment resulting in a final MLD of 2.8 ± 0.6 mm. Overall, the laser success rate in this group was 87 % and only 3 (10 %) patients sustained a MACE, a rate considered low for acute interventions in such degenerated target vessels. Notably, there was no case of distal embolization and in only 3 % of the patients, a transient “no reflow” phenomenon occurred. This was achieved without insertion of distal protection devices during the laser interventions. Thus, the unique ability of the excimer laser to concomitantly debulke the plaque, suppress platelet aggregation and vaporize thrombus is unmistakable, serving as a considerable asset in the challenging context of revascularization for AMI. Table 4.5 depicts the excimer laser effect on thrombus laden lesions in AMI.
Lasing Technique in AMI Intervention
Routine patient preparation and anticoagulation for PCI are required. With the commonly used excimer laser the energy settings include a fluence of 45 mJ/mm2 with 25 Hz. Supporting guiding catheters and guide wires are beneficial in laser procedures. Catheter size selection relates inversely to the stenosis severity whereby the greater the stenosis the smaller the initial catheter size [38]. Proper lasing technique is crucial to ensure success with laser angioplasty [39]. Since the depth of the excimer laser penetration is shallow (35–50 μm) a slow catheter advancement (0.5 mm/s) is recommended. The CVX-300 console computer limits each lasing train to an interval of 5 s except for the X-80 0.9 mm catheter which is designed for 10 s emissions. Reaching the distal end of the stenosis, the operator may consider slow retrograde [pull back] lasing for maximizing thrombus removal. Since contrast media significantly amplifies the laser generated acoustic shock waves [40], any contrast in the vessel must be removed prior to laser activation. This step eliminates potential vessel trauma. This is accomplished by initial injection of 10 cc saline into the guiding catheter and then injection of 3–5 cc saline along the intervals of laser advancement. Infrequently, the saline may increase the Q-T interval and/or ischemia ensues. In such instances decreasing the saline volume to 1–2 cc and ensuring longer pauses between the laser trains are indicated [41]. Laser safety is an important component of the intervention and personnel and the patient alike must wear special protective goggles whenever the laser is enabled.
Altogether, based on the abovementioned findings the rationale for using laser in PCI for AMI is summarized as follows:
-
1.
The laser is a user friendly technology which enables rapid preparation and activation for treatment of emergency cardiovascular conditions.
-
2.
The laser offers highly selective absorption within the target plaque and thrombus resulting in expedient plaque debulking and thrombus removal are observed.
-
3.
Laser enhances the effect of pharmacolytics on intracoronary thrombus, even in old, organized or resistant thrombus.
-
4.
Laser induces unique, selective suppression of platelet aggregation kinetics.
-
5.
Laser creates rapid restoration of adequate antegrade coronary flow in the infarct- related vessel.
-
6.
Laser facilitates adjunct stenting.
-
7.
The contemporary coronary laser has an established record of reliability, safety and efficiency as observed in coronary and peripheral interventions.
Complications Associated with the Use of Laser in AMI
As with any other PCI device the laser operators should recognize that it can cause specific complications with serious adverse impact on the targeted lesions, vessels and myocardium and the procedure outcome. These complications include perforation, dissection, spasm, acute closure, thrombosis, distal embolization, “no reflow” phenomenon and failure to achieve the acute revascularization goals. In most instances, complications though relatively rare, mainly relate to mistakes in the operator judgment mistakes and faulty lasing practices [42]. Thus understanding proper lasing techniques and the unique physical characteristics of the laser are imperative for elimination of laser induced complications.
Summary
The laser is a useful technology for application in PCI along each of the various stages of evolving acute myocardial infarctions. The merits of this device are attributed to its reliance upon sound physics principles, the user friendly technology, and, uniquely, the simultaneous ability to vaporize atherosclerotic obstructive plaques, rapidly remove thrombi and suppress platelet aggregation. Due to the precision of the laser debulking emission and the incorporation of slow advancement lasing techniques, the excimer laser does not require placement of adjunct of distal protection devices. Incorporating proper lasing technique is a prerequisite for procedural success including emphasis on slow laser catheter advancement along the target lesion, constant injections of intracoronary saline during laser emission and use intermittent laser debulking mode.
References
Kushner FG, Hand M, Smith Jr SC, et al. 2009 focused updates: ACC/AHA guidelines for management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction and ACC/AHA/SCAI guidelines on percutaneous coronary intervention; a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:2205–41.
Van de Werf F, Bax J, Betriu A, et al. Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with persistent ST-segment elevation: the Task Force on the Management of ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:2909–45.
Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials. Lancet. 2003;361:13–20-468.
Topaz O. Chapter 26. The thrombus containing lesion. In: Topol EJ, Teirstein PS, editors. Textbook of interventional cardiology. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2011. p. 336–56.
Topaz O, Perin EC, Jesse RL, Mohanty PK, Carr Jr M, Rosenschein U. Power thrombectomy in acute ischemic coronary syndromes. Angiology. 2003;54:457.
Topaz O. Editorial. Comparison between thrombus removal devices: aspirations meet reality. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;78:20–2.
Topaz O. Editorial. Thrombectomy during primary PCI for STEMI – call of the thrombus. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;80:1181–2.
Topaz O, Ebersole D, Dahm J, Das T, Madyoon H, Perin EC. Excimer laser revascularization: current indications, applications and techniques. Lasers Med Sci. 2001;16:72–7.
Topaz O, Vetrovec GW. Laser for optical thrombolysis and facilitation of balloon angioplasty following failed pharmacologic thrombolysis. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1995;36:38–42.
Topaz O. Editorial. Novel thrombus displacement technology for STEMI revascularization. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;80:65–6.
Topaz O. Editorial. Excimer laser thrombolysis: an emerging option for acute ischemic coronary syndromes. Lasers Med Sci. 2001;16:130–2.
Topaz O, Rozenbaum EA, Battista S, Peterson C, Wysham DG. Laser facilitated angioplasty and thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction complicated by prolonged or recurrent chest pain. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1993;28:7–16.
Topaz O. Holmium laser-induced coronary thrombolysis. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 1996;3:327–30:22:228–239.
de Marchena E, Mallon S, Posada J, Joshi B, Correa L, Myerburg RJ. Direct holmium laser assisted balloon angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1993;71:1223–5.
Topaz O. A new safer lasing technique for laser facilitated coronary angioplasty. J Interv Cardiol. 1993;6:297–306.
Topaz O. Coronary laser angioplasty. In: Topol EJ, editor. Textbook of interventional cardiology. 2nd ed (Suppl). Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; 1995. p. 235–55.
Heuser RR. Editorial. Lasers in coronary disease. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1993;28:17.
Topaz O. Holmium laser angioplasty. Semin Interv Cardiol. 1996;1:149–61.
Topaz O, McIvor M, Stone GW, Krucoff MW, Perin EC, Fosschi AE, Sutton J, Nair R, deMarchena E, and the Holmium: YAG laser multicenter investigators. Acute results, complications and effect of lesion characteristics on outcome with the solid-state, pulsed-wave, mid-infrared laser angioplasty system: final multicenter registry report. Lasers Surg Med. 1998;22:228–39.
Dahm JB, Topaz O, Woenckhaus C, et al. Laser facilitated thrombectomy: a new therapeutic option for treatment of thrombus laden coronary lesions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2002;56:365–72.
Topaz O, Ebersole D, Das T, et al. Excimer laser angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction (the CARMEL multicenter trial). Am J Cardiol. 2004;93:694–701.
Topaz O, Polkampally PR, Rizk M, Mohanty PK, Bangs J, Bernardo NL. Excimer laser debulking for percutaneous coronary intervention in left main coronary artery disease. Lasers Med Sci. 2009;24:955–60.
Topaz O. Lasers in CTO. In: Waksman R, Saito S, editors. Chronic total occlusions. Chichester: Wiley; 2009. p. 150–64.
Topaz O, Polkampally PR, Topaz A, Polkampally CR, Jara J, Rizk M, McDowell K, Feldman G. Utilization of excimer laser debulking for critical lesions unsuitable for standard renal angioplasty. Lasers Surg Med. 2009;41:622–7.
Topaz O, Lippincott R, Bellendir J, et al. Optimally spaced excimer laser coronary catheters: performance analysis. J Clin Laser Med Surg. 2001;19:9–14.
Topaz O. Plaque removal and thrombus dissolution with pulsed-wave lasers’ photoacoustic energy-biotissue interactions and their clinical manifestations. Cardiology. 1996;87:384–91.
Topaz O, Minisi AJ, Morris C, et al. Photoacoustic fibrinolysis: pulsed wave mid infrared laser-clot interaction. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 1996;3:209–14.
Topaz O, Minisi AJ, Bernardo NL, et al. Alterations of platelet aggregation kinetics with ultraviolet laser emission: the “stunned platelet phenomenon”. Thromb Haemost. 2001;86:1087–93.
Topaz O, Morris C, Minisi AJ, Mohanty PK, Carr Jr M. Enhancement of t-PA induced fibrinolysis with laser energy: in –vitro observations. Lasers Med Sci. 1999;14:123–8.
Topaz O, Minisi AJ, Mohanty PK, et al. In-vino effect of coronary laser angioplasty on atherosclerotic plaques: histopathologic analysis. Cardiovasc Pathol. 2001;10:223–8.
Topaz O, Rozenbaum E, Schumacher A, Luxenberg MG. Solid-state, mid-infrared laser facilitated coronary angioplasty: clinical and quantitative angiographic results in 112 patients. Lasers Surg Med. 1996;19:260–72.
Topaz O, Bernardo NL, Shah R, et al. Effectiveness of excimer laser coronary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction or in unstable angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol. 2001;87:849–55.
Topaz O, Minisi A, Bernardo NL, et al. Comparison of effectiveness of excimer laser angioplasty in patients with acute coronary syndromes in those with versus those without normal left ventricular ejection fraction. Am J Cardiol. 2003;91:797–802.
Topaz O, Ebersole D, Dahm JB, et al. Excimer laser in myocardial infarction: a comparison between STEMI patients with established Q-wave versus patients with non-STEMI (non-Q). Lasers Med Sci. 2008;23:1–10.
Topaz O, Shah R, Mohanty PK, McQueen RA, Janin Y, Bernardo NL. Application of excimer laser angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction. Lasers Surg Med. 2001;29:185–92.
Ebersole D, Dahm JB, Das T, et al. Excimer laser revascularization of saphenous vein grafts in acute myocardial infarction. J Invasive Cardiol. 2004;16:177–80.
Dahm JB, Ebersole D, Das T, et al. Prevention of distal embolization and no-reflow in patients with acute myocardial infarction and total occlusion in the infarct-related vessels. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2005;64:67–74.
Topaz O, Safian RD. Excimer laser coronary angioplasty. In: Safian RD, Freed MS, editors. Manual of interventional cardiology. 3rd ed. Royal Oaks: Physicians Press; 2001. p. 681–91.
Topaz O. Laser. In: Topol EJ, editor. Textbook of interventional cardiology. 4th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2003. p. 675–703.
Tcheng JE. Saline infusion in excimer laser coronary angioplasty. Semin Interv Cardiol. 1996;1:135–41.
Topaz O. Laser. In: Topol EJ, editor. Textbook of interventional cardiology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1998. p. 615–33.
Topaz O. Editorial. Whose fault is it? Notes on “true” versus “pseudo” laser failure. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1995;36:1–4.
Acknowledgment
The authors appreciate the invaluable assistance of Matthew Holtz CVT, RCIS in the preparations of this chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Topaz, O., Topaz, A. (2015). Laser in Acute Myocardial Infarction. In: Topaz, O. (eds) Lasers in Cardiovascular Interventions. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5220-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5220-0_4
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-5219-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-5220-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)