Curiosity-driven research has traditionally investigated problems, issues, and challenges through a variety of research designs to match the research foci without many formal constraints. The character of those designs has been the venue of the researchers, to some degree the funding agency, and the research setting. The creative challenge for the researcher has been consideration of the nature of the problem and research question, development of the problem space, and the monetary, instrumental, and contextual resources available. Increasingly over the last 10—15 years, another presence has joined the research team—the Research Ethics Board (REB), Research Ethics Committee (REC), or Institutional Review Board (IRB). REBs (we use REBS, RECs, and IRBs interchangeably in this chapter) play a mandatory role in reviewing and permitting research conducted under the agency of funding bodies and educational or research institutions in many countries. Over this same time, REBs have become widely accepted as a necessary and reasonable process to ensure that ethical standards of research are maintained and to avoid the potential for litigation resulting fromfaulty research designs and procedures. However, some researchers contend that the unified research ethics regulations, or common rule, for all disciplines overemphasize biomedical inquiries, risks, and norms—leaving much of the uniqueness of social sciences, education, and professional practices and their associated research methods lacking consideration. While the value of REBs is recognized, it is also evident that their procedures and practices are not stable or neutral in their impact on researchers, he potential research topics that are undertaken, and the research designs utilized. These effects and the array of differential influences can be seen on every campus and organization where research ethics reviews operate and, as described in this chapter, in Africa, Asia, Canada, Europe, New Zealand, and the United States.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Educational Research
- Indigenous People
- Research Ethic Board
- Science Education Research
- Research Ethic Committee
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Alaska Federation of Natives. (1993). Alaska Federation of Natives guidelines for research.Retrieved June 8, 2008, from http://ankn.uaf.edu/IKS/afnguide.html
Alaska Native Knowledge Network. (n.d.). Resources for compiling and exchanging information related to Alaska Native knowledge systems and ways of knowing. Retrieved June 8, 2008, from http://www.ankn.uaf.edu/
American Educational Research Association. (1992). Ethical standards of the American Educational Research Association. Educational Researcher, 21(7), 23–26.
American Indian Law Center Inc. (1999). Model tribal research code (3rd edn.). Albuquerque, NM: Author. Available from http://www.ihs.gov/MedicalPrograms/Research/pdf_files/mdl-code.pdf
American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Retrieved May 31, 2008, from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code2002.html
Amusan, O. O. G., Dlamini, P. S., Msonthi, J. D.,&Makhubu, L. P. (2002). Some herbal remedies from Manzini region of Swaziland. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 79(1),109–112.
Anthony, R. J. (2004, October). Consistency of ethics review. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(1), Art. 5. Retrieved from http://217.160.35.246/fqs-texte/1-05/05-1-5-e.htm
Assembly of Alaska Native Educators. (2000). Guidelines for respecting cultural knowledge.Retrieved June 8, 2008, from http://ankn.uaf.edu/publications/knowledge.html
Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies. (2000). Guidelines for ethical research in indigenous studies. Canberra, Australia: Author.
Bannister, K. P. (2008). Ethical considerations in community-university research and learning collaborations for the University of Victoria. Unpublished discussion document for the Human Research Ethics Board, University of Victoria, British Columbia.
Benatar, S. R. (2002). Reflections and recommendations on research ethics in developing countries. Social Science&Medicine, 54(7), 1131–1141.
Blackstone, M. A. (2007). Power dynamics and ethical practices governing artists and their research participants. NCEHR/CNERH Communiqué, 14(1), 11–16.
British Educational Research Association. (1992). Ethical guidelines for educational research.Edinburgh, Scotland: British Educational Research Association/Scottish Council for Research in Education.
British Educational Research Association. (2004). Revised ethical guidelines for educational research. Retrieved June 5, 2008, from http://www.bera.ac.uk/publications/pdfs/ETHICA1. PDF
British Psychological Society. (2008). Generic professional practice guidelines. Retrieved June 9,2008, from http://www.bps.org.uk/publications/prof-pract/prof-pract_home.cfm
British Sociological Association. (2002, March). Statement of ethical practice for the British Sociological Association Retrieved June 9, 2008, from http://www.britsoc.co.uk/equality/ Statement + Ethical + Practice.htm
Brydon-Miller, M.,&Greenwood, D. (2006). A re-examination of the relationship between action research and human subjects review processes. Action Research, 4(1), 117–128.
Bryman, A. (2001). Ethics in social research. In A. Bryman (Ed.), Social research methods (pp. 475–486). London: Oxford University Press.
Burgess, R. G. (Ed.). (1989). The ethics of educational research. London: Falmer.
Cabana, M. D., Rand, C. S., Powe, N. R., Wu, A. W., Wilson, M. H., Abboud, P.-A. C., et al. (1999). Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines?: A framework for improvement. Journal of the American Medical Association, 282(15), 1458–1465.
Canadian Institutes of Health Research. (2007, May). CIHR guidelines for health research involving Aboriginal people. Retrieved July 14, 2008, from http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/29134. html
Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada,&Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. (1998). Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical conduct for research involving humans [with 2000, 2002, 2005 amendments]. Retrieved June 5, 2008, from http://www.pre.ethics.gc.ca/ english/policystatement/policystatement.cfm
Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada,&Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. (n.d.-a). Interagency advisory panel on research ethics. Retrieved June 6, 2008, from http://pre.ethics.gc.ca/ english/
Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada,&Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. (n.d.-b). TCPS: Section 6. Research involving Aboriginal Peoples. Retrieved June 9, 2008, from http://www. pre.ethics.gc.ca/english/policystatement/section6.cfm
Canadian Interagency Advisory Panel on Research Ethics; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Ethics Special Working Committee. (2006, December). Qualitative research in the context of the TCPS: A follow-up to the Giving Voice to the Spectrum report and a discussion paper. Retrieved June 6, 2008, from http://www.pre.ethics.gc.ca/english/workgroups/sshwc/ consultation07.cfm
Cohen, J. J. (2005). A word from the president: “Research integrity is job one”. AAMC Reporter, (September). Retrieved from http://www.aamc.org/newsroom/reporter/sept05/ word.htm
Coupal, L. (2004, October). Practitioner-research and the regulation of research ethics: The challenge of individual, organizational, and social interests. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/ Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(1), Art. 6. Retrieved from http://217.160.35.246/fqs-texte/1-05/05-1-6-e.htm
de Laine, M. (2000). Fieldwork, participation and practice: Ethics and dilemmas in qualitative research. London: Sage.
de Vries, R., Anderson, M. S.,&Martinson, B. C. (2006). Normal misbehavior: Scientists talk about the ethics of research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 1(1), 43–50.
di Norcia, V. (2006). The ethics in human research ethics [Guest editorial]. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 1(2), 1–2.
Elliott, J. (1989). Towards a code of practice for funded educational research. Research Intelligence, 31, 14.
Ells, C.,&Gutfreund, S. (2006). Myths about qualitative research and the Tri-Council Policy Statement. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 31(3), 361–373. Retrieved from http://www. cjsonline.ca/cjsindex/vol31.html
Florence, M. K.,&Yore, L. D. (2004). Learning to write like a scientist: Coauthoring as an encul-turation task. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(6), 637–668.
Furlong, J. (2004, May). The 2008 RAE and beyond [From the President]. Research Intelligence, 87, 1–2. Retrieved from http://www.bera.ac.uk/pdfs/RI_87.pdf
Gadicke, J. M. (2005). Integrating aboriginal knowledge into the elementary science curriculum.Unpublished master of education project, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia,Canada.
Glass, K. C.,&Kaufert, J. (2007). Research ethics review and aboriginal community values: Can the two be reconciled? Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 2(2), 25–40.
Ham, V. (1999). Tracking the truth or selling one's soul? Reflections on the ethics of a piece of commissioned research. British Journal of Educational Studies, 47(3), 275–282.
Hoonaard, W. C., van den. (2006). Trends in Canadian sociology master's theses in relation to research ethics review, 1995–2004. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics,1(4), 77–88.
International Reading Association. (2008, March). Code of ethics. Retrieved May 31, 2008, from http://www.reading.org/association/about/code.html
Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics. (2007, January 23). NIH-funded case study: Research ethics committees in Africa report inadequate funding, staffing and training [Press release].Retrieved from http://www.bioethicsinstitute.org/web/module/press/pressid/91/interior.asp
Keith-Spiegel, P., Koocher, G. P.,&Tabachnick, B. (2006). What scientists want from their research ethics committee. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 1(1),67–82.
Kennedy, D. (2006, January 20). Acts of God? [Editorial]. Science, 311(5759), 303.
King's College London. (n.d.). Applying to the education and management panel. Retrieved June 6, 2008, from http://www.kcl.ac.uk/research/ethics/applicants/sshl/panels/em/
Kuo, I. T. (2001). Introduction of human research committee in Taiwan [in Chinese]. Newsletter for Research of Applied Ethics, 7(19), 22–24.
Landwirth, J. (2006). [Letter to the Editor]. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 1(1), 3–4.
Leadbeater, B., Banister, E., Benoit, C., Jansson, M., Marshall, A.,&Riecken, T. (Eds.). (2006). Ethical issues in community-based research with children and youth. Toronto, Ontario,Canada: University of Toronto Press.
Lee-Treweek, G.,&Linkogle, S. (Eds.). (2000). Danger in the field: Risk and ethics in social research. New York: Routledge.
Levine, R. J. (2006). Empirical research to evaluate ethics committees' burdensome and perhaps unproductive policies and practices: A proposal. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 1(3), 1–4.
Lopus, J. S., Grimes, P. W., Becker, W. E.,&Pearson, R. A. (2007). Effects of human subjects requirements on classroom research: Multidisciplinary evidence. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 2(3), 69–78.
Louw, B.,&Delport, R. (2006). Contextual challenges in South Africa: The role of a research ethics committee. Journal of Academic Ethics, 4(1), 39–60.
Macauley, A. C., Delormier, T., McComber, A. M., Cross, E. J., Potvin, L. P., Paradis, G., et al.(1998). Participatory research with native community of Kahnawake creates innovative code of research ethics. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 89(2), 105–108.
Maguire, M. H. (2004). Review of the book: Situated ethics in educational research. Science Education, 88(5), 813–816.
Makhubu, L. (1998). Bioprospecting in an African context [Essays on science and society] Science, 282(5386), 41–42.
McDonald, M. (2004). [Review of the book: Danger in the field: Risk and ethics in social research]. Science Education, 88(5), 816–818.
McGinn, M. K. (2005). Ethical and friendly researchers, but not insiders: A response to Blodgett, Boyer, and Turk. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research,6(3), Art. 37. Retrieved from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0503375
McKeever, M. (2000). Snakes and ladders: Ethical issues in conducting educational research in a post-colonial context. In H. Simons&R. Usher (Eds.), Situated ethics in educational research (pp. 101–115). London: Routledge/Falmer.
Minkler, M. (2004). Ethical challenges for the “outside” researcher in community-based participatory research. Health Education&Behavior, 31(6), 684–697.
Moretti, M., Leadbeater, B.,&Marshall, A. (2006). Stepping into community-based research: Preparing students to meet new ethics and professional challenges. In B. Leadbeater, E. Banister, C. Benoit, M. Jansson, A. Marshall,&T. Riecken (Eds.), Ethical issues in community-based research with children and youth (pp. 232–244). Toronto, Ontario,Canada: University of Toronto Press.
National Science Teachers Association. (2007, June). NSTA position statement: Principles of professionalism for science educators. Retrieved May 31, 2008, from http://www.nsta.org/ about/positions/professionalism.aspx
New Zealand Government. (1991). Resource Management Act. Wellington, NZ: Government Printer.
New Zealand Government. (1992). Health and Safety in Employment Act. Wellington, NZ:Government Printer.
New Zealand Government. (1993). Privacy Act. Wellington, NZ: Government Printer.
New Zealand Government. (1994). Copyright Act. Wellington, NZ: Government Printer.
New Zealand Ministry of Education. (1993a). National education guidelines. Wellington, NZ: Government Printer.
New Zealand Ministry of Education. (1993b). The New Zealand curriculum framework. Wellington, NZ: Government Printer.
New Zealand Ministry of Education. (1993c). Science in the national curriculum. Wellington, NZ: Learning Media.
New Zealand Ministry of Education. (1996a). Biology in the New Zealand curriculum. Wellington,NZ: Learning Media.
New Zealand Ministry of Education. (1996b). Chemistry in the New Zealand curriculum.Wellington, NZ: Learning Media.
New Zealand Ministry of Education. (1996c). Physics in the New Zealand curriculum. Wellington,NZ: Learning Media.
New Zealand Ministry of Education. (1996d). Technology in the New Zealand curriculum.Wellington, NZ: Learning Media.
New Zealand Ministry of Education. (2002). Curriculum stocktake report to Minister of Education, September 2002. Wellington, NZ: Author.
National Research Act of 1974. Pub. L. No. 93–348, 88 Stat. 342. (1974).
Nuremburg Code. (1948). Retrieved June 7, 2008, from http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/ nuremberg.html
Plemmons, D. (2007). Studying IRB processes. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 2(1), 71–72.
Pritchard, I. A. (2002). Travelers and trolls: Practitioner research and institutional review boards.Educational Researcher, 31(3), 3–13.
Protection of human subjects, 45 CFR 46. (2005).
Roberts, L. (2006). Current practice in research ethics: Global trends and new opportunities for African universities [Extended executive summary]. Retrieved June 9, 2008, from http://www. research-africa.net/media/pdf/EthicsExecSum.pdf
Royal Society of New Zealand. (2005). 2005 Preliminary research proposal guidelines for applicants. Retrieved June 6, 2005, from http://www.rsnz.org/funding/marsden_fund/media/2005_ Prelim_Guidelines.doc
Rubin, P.,&Sieber, J. E. (2006). Empirical research on IRBs and methodologies usually associated with minimal risk. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 1(4), 1–4.
Schnarch, B. (2004). Ownership, control, access, and possession (OCAP) or self-determination applied to research: A critical analysis of contemporary First Nations research and some options for First Nations communities. Journal of Aboriginal Health, 1(1), 80–95.
Shih, Y.-T., Shih, S.-F., Chen, N.-S.,&Chen, C.-S. (2005). Human research protections: Current status in Taiwan and policy proposals [in Chinese]. Taiwan Journal of Public Health, 24(4),360–373.
Shore, N. (2007). Community-based participatory research and the ethics review process. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 2(1), 31–41.
Sieber, J. E. (2006). The evolution of best ethical practices in human research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 1(1), 1–2.
Sieber, J. E. (2007). Respect for persons and informed consent—A moving target. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 2(3), 1–2.
Simons, H. (1989). Ethics of case study in educational research and evaluation. In R. G. Burgess (Ed.), The ethics of educational research (pp. 114–140). London: Falmer.
Simons, H. (1995). The politics and ethics of educational research in England: Contemporary issues. British Educational Research Journal, 21(4), 435–449.
Simons, H.,&Usher, R. (Eds.) (2000). Situated ethics in educational research. London:Routledge/Falmer.
South Africa Department of Health. (2004). Ethics in health research: Principles, structures and processes [Research ethics guidelines — 2004]. Retrieved June 6, 2008, from http://www.doh.gov.za/docs/index.html [Documents > > Fact Sheets/Guidelines > > Norms, standards, instructions]
South Africa Government. (2003). National Health Act, No. 61. Retrieved June 7, 2008, from http://www.doh.gov.za/docs/legislation-f.html
South Africa Human Sciences Research Council. (n.d.). HSRC code of ethics. Retrieved June 6,2008, from http://www.hsrc.ac.za/Corporate_Information-8.phtml
Strike, K. A., Anderson, M. S., Curren, R., van Geel, T., Pritchard, I.,&Robertson, E. (2002).Ethical standards of the American Educational Research Association: Cases and commentary.Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Swain, H. (2006, August 11). Protect yourself and the subjects. The Times Higher Education Supplement, p. 12. Available from http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.aspsectioncode = 26&storycode = 204808)
Taiwan Academia Sinica. (2007). Homepage. Retrieved June 8, 2008, from http://www.sinica.edu.tw/main_e.shtml
Taiwan Academia Sinica. (n.d.). Human subject research ethics committee/IRB. Retrieved July 16,2008, from http://proj1.sinica.edu.tw/̃irb/e-education-1.htm
Treaty of Waitangi. (1840). Read the Treaty. Retrieved June 8, 2008, from http://www.nzhistory.net.nz/politics/treaty/read-the-treaty/english-text
Truscott, D. (2004). Fieldwork, participation, and practice: Ethics and dilemmas in qualitative research [Book review]. Science Education, 88(5), 811–813.
United Kingdom Economic and Social Research Council. (2006). Research ethics framework (REF). Retrieved June 5, 2008, from http://www.esrcsocietytoday.ac.uk/ESRCInfoCentre/ Images/ESRC_Re_Ethics_Frame_tcm6-11291.pdf
United Kingdom Economic and Social Research Council. (n.d.-a). Homepage. Retrieved June 9, 2008, from http://www.esrcsocietytoday.ac.uk/ESRCInfoCentre/opportunities/ research_ethics_framework/
United Kingdom Economic and Social Research Council. (n.d.-b). Research ethics framework:Homepage. Retrieved June 9, 2008, from http://www.esrcsocietytoday.ac.uk/ESRCInfoCentre/opportunities/research_ethics_framework/
United Nations. (1990). Convention on the rights of the child. New York: UN High Commission for Human Rights Office. Available from http://www.unicef.org/crc/
United States Department of Health and Human Services. (n.d.). Basic HHS policy for protection of human research subjects (45 CFR 46). Retrieved July 16, 2008, from http://www.hhs.gov/ ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm
United States Interagency Arctic Research Policy Committee; Social Science Task Force. (1995).Principles for the conduct of research in the Arctic. Arctic Research of the United States,9(Spring), 56–57. Retrieved from http://arcticcircle.uconn.edu/SEEJ/ethics.html
United States National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979, April 18). The Belmont report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Retrieved June 6, 2008, from http://ohsr. od.nih.gov/guidelines/belmont.html
United States National Research Council. (2002). Scientific research in education. Committee on Scientific Principles for Education Research. R. J. Shavelson&L. Towne (Eds.). Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
United States National Research Council. (2004). Advancing scientific research in education.Committee on Research in Education. L. Towne, L. L. Wise,&T. M. Winters (Eds.). Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC:The National Academies Press.
University of Botswana. (2004). Policy on ethics and ethical conduct in research. Retrieved June 6, 2008, from http://www.ub.bw/ord/r_documents.cfm?d = Ethics_Policy_ RD04_05H.pdf
University of Cape Town. (2006). Faculty of Humanities guide to research ethics: Research on human subjects. Retrieved June 6, 2008, from http://www.humanities.uct.ac.za/research/ ethics/
University of Pretoria. (n.d.). Code of ethics for research. Retrieved June 8, 2008, from http://web.up.ac.za/sitefiles/File/3653/Code%20of%20ethics%20for%20research(1).doc
University of Victoria Human Research Ethics Board. (2008, June). Application for ethics approval for human participant research. Retrieved June 6, 2008, from http://www.research.uvic.ca/forms/index.htm#HREC [HREB > > Applications]
University of Victoria Human Research Ethics Office. (2008, January). Guidelines for ethics in dual-role research for teachers and other practitioners. Retrieved June 5, 2008, from http:// www.research.uvic.ca/forms/hrec/geidrr.pdf [HREB > > Guidelines]
World Medical Association. (2004). Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Retrieved June 6, 2008, from http://www.wma.net/e/ policy/b3.htm
Yang, C. M., Kuo, N. W., Chen, C. S.,&Chou, C. Y. (2001). Situational analysis of research ethics review in Taiwan. Public Health Quarterly, 28(3), 177–187.
Yore, L. D., Chinn, P. W. U.,&Hand, B. (Eds.). (2008). Science literacy for all: Influences of culture, language, and knowledge about nature and naturally occurring events [Special Issue].L1—Educational Studies of Language and Literacy, 8(1). Retrieved from http://l1.publication-archive.com/public?fn = enter&repository = 1
Zeni, J. (Ed.). (2001). Ethical issues in practitioner research. New York: Teachers College Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media B.V
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Anthony, R.J. et al. (2009). Research Ethics Boards and the Gold Standard(s) in Literacy and Science Education Research. In: Shelley, M.C., Yore, L.D., Hand, B. (eds) Quality Research in Literacy and Science Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8427-0_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8427-0_24
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8426-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8427-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)