abstract
This paper reports on some of the findings from a review of research commissioned by the Institute of Physics into the participation of girls in physics. The review was commissioned in response to concern about the continuing decline in the numbers of girls studying physics post-16 in England. The review includes 177 sources of national and international research literature on the participation of girls in science and in physics and is a narrative review covering 161 pages. The review findings reveal a complex picture of the reasons for girls continuing decline in participation related to their lack of meaningful access to physics which is constrained by a complex web of interactions in girls’ curriculum and assessment experience. When this is combined with perceptions of the representation of physics it results in a reduction in girls’ self-efficacy and self-concept in the subject as they progress through schooling. The review recommends that purposes for studying physics need to be made explicit for girls in particular, and that this should happen within their curriculum experience rather than outside it. Relevance of the subject to girls’ lives outside the classroom is as important as prior knowledge so curriculum interventions and teachers should take this into account. Staff development is needed to help teachers develop strategies to increase the participation of girls and this is particularly important where single sex teaching is used. Long term evaluation of different approaches, further research into the difficulty of physics and access to achievement data is needed
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
References
Bennett, J., et al. (2003). A systematic review of the effects of context-based and Science-Technology-Society (STS) approaches in the teaching of secondary science. Research Evidence in Education Library. (London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education.)
Boaler, J. (1997). Experiencing School Mathematics: Teaching Styles, Sex And Setting. (Buckingham: Open University Press.)
Colley, A., et al. (1994). School subject preferences of pupils in single-sex and co-educational secondary schools. Educational Studies 20(3): 379–385.
Elwood, J. and C. Gipps (1999). Review of Recent Research on the Achievement of Girls in Single-Sex Schools. (London: Institute of Education University of London.)
Fitz-Gibbon, C. T. and L. Vincent (1994). Candidates’ Performance in Public Examinations in Mathematics and Science, CEM Centre Report for the School Curriculum and Assessment Authority: 30.
Gipps, C. and P. Murphy (1994). A Fair Test?: Assessment, Achievement and Equity. (Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.)
GSA. (2004). GSA Survey of maths, science and modern languages at A level Summer 2004. Leicester, Girls Schools Association.
Häussler, P. (1987). Measuring students’ interest in physics – design and results of a cross-sectional study in the Federal Republic of Germany. International Journal of Science Education 9(1): 79–92.
Hoffmann, L. (1997, September). An Intervention Project Promoting Girls’ and Boys’ Interest in Physics: Opening the Door to Physics for Girls.ESERA Symposium: Gender Issues in Physics. (Paper presented at the first Conference of the ESERA, Rome.)
Kelly, A. (1988). Gender differences in teacher-pupil interactions: A meta-analytic review. Research in Education 39: 1–24.
Kenway, J. and A. Gough (1998). Gender and science education in schools: a review with attitude. Studies in Science Education 31: 1–30.
Krogh, L. B. and P. Thomsen (2005). Studying students’ attitudes towards science from a cultural perspective but with a quantitative methodology: Border crossing into the physics classroom. International Journal of Science Education 27(3): 281–302.
Labudde, P. (2000). Girls and physics: teaching and learning strategies tested by classroom interventions in grade 11. International Journal of Science Education 22(2): 143–157.
Lindhal, B. (2003, July). Changing the Subject and Teaching to Get More Students to Science and Technology?(Paper presented at the 11th Gender and Science and Technology Conference, Mauritius.)
Murphy, P. and J. Elwood (1998). Gendered experiences, choices and achievement – exploring the links. International Journal of Inclusive Education 2(2): 95–118.
Murphy, P. and E. Whitelegg (2006a). Girls in the Physics Classroom: A Review of Research on the Participation of Girls in Physics. (London: Institute of Physics: 1–61. An electronic copy can be downloaded from: http://www.iop.org/Our_Activities/Schools_and_Colleges/ Making_a_Difference/Policy/page_5534.html (last accessed on 15th September 2006.)
Murphy, P. and E. Whitelegg (2006b). Girls and Physics: continuing barriers to ’belonging’. The Curriculum Journal 17(3): 281–305.
Murphy, R. J. L. (1982). Sex differences in objective test performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology 52: 213–219.
Ormerod, M. B. and D. Duckworth (1975).Pupils’ Attitudes to Science: A Review of Research. (Windsor, Berks: National Federation for Educational Research.)
Osborne, J. and S. Collins (2000). Pupils’ and Parents Views of the School science Curriculum. (London: Wellcome Trust.)
Osborne, J., et al. (2003). Attitudes towards science: a review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education 25(9), 1049–1079.
Parker, L. H. and L. J. Rennie (2002). Teachers’ implementation of gender-inclusive instructional strategies in single-sex and mixed-sex science classrooms. International Journal of Science Education 24(9), 881–897.
Powney, J. (1996). Gender and Attainment: A Review. (Edinburgh: Scottish Council for Research in Education (SCRE))
Reid, N. and E. A. Skryabina (2002). Attitudes towards physics. Research in Science and Technological Education 20(1), 67–80.
Ruddock, G., et al. (2003). Where England stands in the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) 2003: Summary of national report for England. (Slough: NFER Department for Education and Skills, 12.)
Sammons, P., et al. (1994). Continuity of School Effects. (London: Institute of Education.)
Sharp, C., et al. (1996). The Take-Up of Advanced Mathematics and Science Courses – Summary Report. (Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research report for SCAA, 19.)
Sharp, G. (2004). A Longitudinal Study Investigating Pupil Attitudes Towards their Science Learning Experiences from a Gender Perspective. Unpublished PhD thesis. (Milton Keynes, UK: The Open University.)
Smithers, A. and P. Robinson (1995). Co-educational and Single-sex Schooling.(Manchester: Centre for Education and Employment Research, University of Manchester.)
Smithers, A. and P. Robinson (1997). Co-education and Single-sex – Revisited. (Uxbridge: Brunel University.)
Spielhofer, T., et al. (2002). The Impact of School Size and Single-sex Education on Performance. (Slough: NFER for the Local Government Association.)
Stables, A. (1990). Differences between pupils from mixed and single-sex schools in their enjoyment of school subjects and in their attitudes to science and to school. Educational Review 42(3): 221–230.
Stokking, K. (2000). Predicting the choice of physics in secondary education. International Journal of Science Education 22(12): 1261–1283.
Whitelegg, E. and C. Edwards (2001). Beyond the laboratory: Learning physics in real life contexts. (in R. Duit (Ed.), Research in Science Education: Past, Present and Future. (pp. 337–342) Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.)
Willingham, W. W. and N. S. Cole (1997). Gender and Fair Assessment. (Mahwah, New Jersey/London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.)
Zohar, A. and Bronshtein B. (2005). Physics teachers’ knowledge and beliefs regarding girls’ low participation rates in advanced physics classes. International Journal of Science Educatiion 27(1): 61–77.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer
About this paper
Cite this paper
Whitelegg, E., Murphy, P., Hart, C. (2007). Girls and Physics: Dilemmas and Tensions. In: Pintó, R., Couso, D. (eds) Contributions from Science Education Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5032-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5032-9_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-5031-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5032-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)