Skip to main content

On the Invention of Photographic Meaning

  • Chapter
Thinking Photography

Part of the book series: Communications and Culture

Abstract

The meaning of a photograph, like that of any other entity, is inevitably subject to cultural definition. The task here is to define and engage critically something we might call the ‘photographic discourse’. A discourse can be defined as an arena of information exchange, that is, as a system of relations between parties engaged in communicative activity. In a very important sense the notion of discourse is a notion of limits. That is, the overall discourse relation could be regarded as a limiting function, one that establishes a bounded arena of shared expectations as to meaning. It is this limiting function that determines the very possibility of meaning. To raise the issue of limits, of the closure affected from within any given discourse situation, is to situate oneself outside, in a fundamentally metacritical relation, to the criticism sanctioned by the logic of the discourse.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes and References

  1. Roland Barthes, ‘Rhetoric of the Image’, Communications, vol. 4, 1964, p. 44.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Milton Brown, in Paul Strand: A Retrospective Monograph, The Years 1915–1968, Millerton, New York, 1971, p. 370.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Victor Burgin

Copyright information

© 1982 Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sekula, A. (1982). On the Invention of Photographic Meaning. In: Burgin, V. (eds) Thinking Photography. Communications and Culture. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16716-6_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics