Abstract
It has been said that the tendency to make use of reminders drawn from literature in discussing problems in moral philosophy is not only dangerous, but needless. Dangers there certainly are, but these have little to do with the reasons offered for the needlessness of such reminders. Reminders drawn from literature, it is said, introduce an unnecessary complexity into one’s philosophising. Indeed, as Peter Winch has pointed out, according to ‘a fairly well-established … tradition in recent Anglo-Saxon moral philosophy … it is not merely permissible, but desirable, to take trivial examples. The rationale of this view is that such examples do not generate the emotion which is liable to surround more serious cases and thus enable us to look more coolly at the logical issues involved,’1 and it carries the implication that ‘moral concerns can be examined quite apart from any consideration of what it is about these concerns which makes them important to us.’2
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Peter Winch, ‘The Universalizability of Moral Judgments’, Ethics and Action (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1972), pp. 154–5.
C. W. K. Mundle, A Critique of Linguistic Philosophy (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1970), p. 14.
E. Kamenka, Marxism and Ethics (London: Macmillan, 1969), p. 35.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1992 D. Z. Phillips
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Phillips, D.Z. (1992). Allegiance and Change in Morality: A Study in Contrasts. In: Interventions in Ethics. Swansea Studies in Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11539-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11539-6_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-11541-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-11539-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)