Abstract
This chapter examines the possibilities and pitfalls of classroom-based English language assessment, drawing on both the language testing and classroom assessment literature in English language education as well as educational assessment more generally. The chapter opens with a brief overview of different contexts for language testing and assessment: external, classroom-based, and second language acquisition research. The second part of the chapter presents research findings that highlight different facets of classroom-based assessment: the different meanings of and purposes for assessment, relationships between formative and summative assessment, approaches and frameworks used in teacher assessment, teacher perceptions and implementation of assessment, and the extent to which conventional measurement paradigms are appropriate for assessing the worth of instructional embedded assessment. These research findings lead into a discussion of current concerns and issues, as well as some of the potential pitfalls associated with classroom-based assessment. The final part of the chapter outlines future directions for the field and highlights some of the challenges for both research and professional practice in relation to classroom-oriented assessment.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Arkoudis, S., & O’Loughlin, K. (2004). Tensions between validity and outcomes: Teachers’ assessment of written work of recently arrived immigrant ESL students. Language Testing, 20(3), 284–304.
Assessment Reform Group. (1999). Assessment for learning: Beyond the Black Box. Cambridge: University of Cambridge School of Education. See also: arg.educ.cam.ac.uk.
Bachman, L. F. 2004. Statistical analysis for language assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bachman, L., & Cohen, A. (1998). Interfaces between second language acquisition and language testing research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bachman, L., & Palmer A. (1996). Language testing in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Banerjee, J., & Luoma, S. (1997). Qualitative approaches to test validation. In C. Clapham, & D. Corson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Language and Education: Vol. 7. Language testing and assessment (pp. 275–287). Dordecht: Kluwer.
Black, P. (1998). Testing: Friend or foe? London: The Falmer Press.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7–74.
Board of Studies. (2000). ESL companion to the English CSF. Victoria.
Breen, M., Barratt-Pugh, C., Derewianka, B., House, H., Hudson, C., Lumley, T., & Rohl, M. (1997). How teachers interpret and use national and state assessment frameworks. (Vols. 1–3). Canberra, Department of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs.
Brindley, G. (1989). Assessing achievement in the learner-centred curriculum. NCELTR Research Series. Macquarie University Sydney: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research.
Brindley, G. (1995). (Ed.). Language assessment in action. Research Series. Macquarie University Sydney: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research.
Brindley, G. (1998). Describing language development: Rating scales and SLA. In L. Bachman, & A. Cohen (Eds.), Interfaces between second language acquisition and language testing research (pp. 112–140). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brindley, G. (2001). Outcomes-based assessment in practice: Some examples and emerging insights. Language Testing, 18(4), 393–408.
Brown, J., & Hudson, T. (1998). The alternatives in language assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 653–675.
Canadian Language Benchmarks. (2000). Canadian language benchmarks 2000: English as a second language for adults. Ottawa, ON: Centre for Canadian Language Benchmarks.
Chapelle, C. (1999). Validity in language assessment. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 19, 254–272.
Cheng, L., Rogers, T., & Hu, H. (2004). ESL/EFL instructors’ classroom assessment practices: Purposes, methods and procedures. Language Testing, 21(3), 360–389.
Clapham, C. (2000). Assessment and testing. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 20, 147–161.
Clarke, S. (1998). Targeting assessment in the primary classroom. Bristol: Hodder & Stoughton.
Clarke, S. (2001). Unlocking formative assessment. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
Davies, A. (1997). Introduction: The limits of ethics in language testing. Language Testing, 14(3), 235–241.
Davison, C. (2004). The contradictory culture of teacher-based assessment: ESL teacher assessment practices in Australian and Hong Kong secondary schools. Language Testing, 20(3), 304–334.
Davison, C., & Tang, R. (2001, February). The contradictory culture of school-based assessment: Teacher assessment practices in Hong Kong and Australia. Paper presented at the American Association for Applied Linguistics, St Louis, USA.
Davison, C., & Williams, A. (Eds.). (2001). Learning from each other: Literacy, labels and limitations. Studies of child English language and literacy development K-12, Vol. 2. Melbourne: Language Australia.
Deakin-Crick, R., Broadfoot, P., & Claxton, G. (2004). Developing an effective lifelong learning inventory: The ELLI project. Assessment in Education, 11(3), 247–272.
Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (1998). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Edelenbos, P., & Kubanek-German, A. (2004). Teacher assessment: The concept of ‘diagnostic competence’. Language Testing, 21(3), 259–283.
Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (2001). Learner uptake in communicative ESL lessons. Language Learning, 51, 281–318.
Gardner, S., & Rea-Dickins, P. (2002). Focus on language sampling: A key issue in EAL assessment. London: National Association for Language Development in the Curriculum (NALDIC).
Genesee, F., & Upshur, J. (1996). Classroom-based evaluation in second language education. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gipps, C. (1994). Beyond testing: Towards a theory of educational assessment. London: The Falmer Press.
Green, A. (1998). Verbal protocol analysis in language testing research (Vol. 5). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA.: Sage.
Gunn, M. (1995). Classroom-based assessment in intensive English centres. In G. Brindley (Ed.), Language assessment in action (pp. 239–270). Macquarie University Sydney: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research.
Hamp-Lyons, L. (1997). Washback, impact and validity: Ethical concerns. Language Testing, 14(3), 295–303.
Hamp-Lyons, L., & Condon, W. (2000). Assessing the portfolio: Principles for practice, theory, and research. Cresskill, New Jersey: Hampton Press, Inc.
Harlen, W., & James, M. (1997). Assessment and learning: Differences and relationships between formative and summative assessment. Assessment in Education, 4(3), 365–379.
Huerta-Macías, A. (1995). Alternative assessment: Responses to commonly asked questions. TESOL Journal, 5, 8–11.
Hughes, A. (1990). Testing for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Karavas-Doukas, K., & Rea-Dickins, P. (1997). (Compilers.). Evaluating innovation and establishing research priorities. Euroconference Proceedings. University of Warwick: Centre for English Language Teacher Education. (Contact: P.Rea-Dickins@bristol.ac.uk).
Kubanek-German, A. (1997). Modern foreign languages in German primary schools: a case study. In K. Karavas & P. Rea-Dickins (Compilers.), 217–225.
Kunnan, A. (1998). (Ed.). Validation in language assessment. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Inc. Publishers.
Leung, C. (2001b, February). Working with pupil talk: Assumptions and stances in teacher assessment of spoken interaction in the mainstream classroom. Paper presented at the American Association for Applied Linguistics, St Louis, USA.
Leung, C. (2002, April). Validity as social construction—Stability and flux. Paper presented at the American Association for Applied Linguistics, Arlington, VA, USA.
Leung, C. (2005). Classroom teacher assessment of second language development: Construct as practice. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language learning and teaching. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Inc. Publishers.
Leung, C., & Mohan, B. (2004). Teacher formative assessment and talk in classroom contexts: Assessment as discourse and assessment of discourse. Language Testing, 21(3), 335–359.
Lynch, B. (2001). Rethinking assessment from a critical perspective. Language Testing, 18(4), 351–372.
Lynch, B. (2003). Language assessment and programme evaluation. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
McKay, P. (2000). On ESL standards for school-age learners. Language Testing, 17(2), 185–214.
McNamara, T. (1996). Measuring second language performance. Harlow, Essex: Addison Wesley Longman Ltd.
McNamara, T. (1998). Policy and social considerations in language assessment. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 18, 304–319.
McNamara, T. (2001). Language assessment as social practice: Challenges for research. Language Testing, 18(4), 333–350.
Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed.) (pp. 13–103). New York: Macmillan.
Mislevy, R. J., Steinberg, L. S., & Almond, R. G. 2002. Design and analysis in task-based language assessment. Language Testing, 19(4), 477–496.
National Languages and Literacy Institute of Australia. (1994). ESL development: Language and literacy in schools (Vol. 1). Canberra: The National Languages and Literacy Institute of Australia.
Nicholas, H., Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (2001). Recasts as feedback to language learners. Language Learning, 51, 719–758.
O’Loughlin, K. (2001). The equivalence of direct and semi-direct speaking tests. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
O’Sullivan, B. (2002). Learner acquaintanceship and oral proficiency test pair-task performance. Language Testing, 19(3), 277–295.
O’Sullivan, B., Weir, C., & Saville, N. (2002). Using observation checklists to validate speaking-test tasks. Language Testing, 19(1), 33–56.
Purpura, J. (1999). Learner strategy use and performance on language tests: A structural equation modelling approach (Vol. 8). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA). (2000). A language in common.
Read, J., & Chapelle, C. (2001). A framework for second language vocabulary assessment. Language Testing, 18(1), 1–32.
Rea-Dickins, P., & Gardner, S. (2000). Snares and silver bullets: Disentangling the construct of formative assessment. Language Testing, 17(2), 215–243.
Rea-Dickins, P. (2001). Mirror, mirror on the wall: Identifying processes of classroom assessment. Language Testing, 18(4), 429–462.
Rea-Dickins, P. (2002). Exploring the educational potential of assessment with reference to learners with English as an additional language. In C. Leung (Ed.), Language and additional/second language issues for school education: A reader for teachers (pp. 81–93). York: York Publishing Services.
Rea-Dickins, P. (2003a). Classroom Assessment of English as an Additional Language: Key Stage 1 Contexts. End of Project Report for ESRC Major Research Grant R000238196, 1999–2002.
Rea-Dickins, P. (2003b, September). Framing assessment: Breaking the mould. Plenary Paper presented at TESOL Symposium on ESL/EFL Standards for Young Learners, University of Rome. Alexandria, Virginia: TESOL, Inc.
Rea-Dickins, P. (2006). Currents and eddies in the discourse of assessment: A learning-focused interpretation. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(2), 163–188.
Rea-Dickins, P., & Rixon, S. (1999). Assessment of young learners’ English—Reasons and means. In S. Rixon (Ed.), Young learners of English: Some research perspectives (pp. 89–101). Addison Wesley Longman/The British Council.
Scheerens, J., Glas, C., & Thomas, S. (2003). Educational evaluation, assessment and monitoring: A systemic approach. Lisse, Abingdon, Exton (PA), Tokyo: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Scott, C. (2005). Washback in the UK primary context with EAL learners: Exploratory case studies. Unpublished PhD Dissertation. Bristol: Graduate School of Education, University of Bristol.
Scott, K., & Erduran, S. (2004). Learning from international frameworks for assessment: EAL descriptors in Australia and the USA. Language Testing, 21(3), 409–431.
Shohamy, E. (1994). The role of language tests in the construction of second-language acquisition theories. In E. Tarone, S. Gass, & A. Cohen (Eds.), Research methodology in second language acquisition (pp. 133–42). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Shohamy, E. (1998). Applying a multiplism approach. In E. Li & G. James (Eds.), Testing and evaluation in second language education. Hong Kong: Language Centre, The University of Science and Technology.
Shohamy, E. (2000). The relationship between language testing and second language acquisition revisited. System, 28, 541–553.
Shohamy, E. (2001a). Democratic assessment as an alternative. Language Testing, 18(4), 373–392.
Shohamy, E. (2001b). The power of tests: A critical perspective on the uses of language tests. London: Pearson.
Spence-Brown, R. (2001). The eye of the beholder: Authenticity in an embedded assessment task. Language Testing, 18(4), 463–481.
Spolsky, B. (1995). Measured words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Teasdale, A., & Leung, C. (2000). Teacher assessment and psychometric theory: A case of paradigm crossing. Language Testing, 17(2), 163–184.
TESOL. (1997). ESL standards for pre-K-12. Alexandria, VA: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.
Torrance, H., & Pryor, J. (1998). Investigating formative assessment. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Tunstall, P., & Gipps, C. (1996). Teacher feedback to young children in formative assessment: A typology. British Educational Research Journal, 22(4), 389–416.
Valette, R. (1994). Teaching, testing and assessment: Conceptualizing the relationship. In C. Hancock (Ed.), Teaching, testing and assessment: Making the connection (pp. 1–42). Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook Company.
Weeden, P., & Winter, J. with Broadfoot, P., Hinett, K., McNess, E., Tidmarsh, C., Triggs, P., & Wilmut (September 1999). The LEARN Project: Learners’ Expectations of Assessment for Learning Nationally. Report for the Qualifications & Curriculum Authority. Bristol: Graduate School of Education.
Weir, C. (1993). Understanding and developing language tests. Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire: Prentice Hall International (UK) Ltd.
Wiliam, D. (2001). An overview of the relationship between assessment and the curriculum. Scott, D. (Eds.). Curriculum and assessment. (pp. 165–181). Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rea-Dickins, P. (2007). Classroom-Based Assessment: Possibilities and Pitfalls. In: Cummins, J., Davison, C. (eds) International Handbook of English Language Teaching. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 15. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-46301-8_36
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-46301-8_36
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-46300-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-46301-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)