Abstract
The FRISCO Report has initiated an important debate on the discipline of information. Chapters 1, 2 and 6 contribute ideas for all shades of opinion, a Broad View contrasting with Chapters 3, 4 and 5, “the core of the report”. This paper presents a Social View as an alternative to this Core View, which it criticises in two ways. Firstly, it limits the scope of information systems by treating it as an adjunct to software engineering, having no place for key properties of information in organisations and society. Secondly, it does not satisfactorily link its framework of concepts to the empirical world, but relies on the mentalistic notions of ‘perceptions’ and ‘conceptions’ in the mind of some, unspecified interpreter. The strength of the Core View lies in its formal precision. But a Social View can lead to an alternative formal framework that can place a much wider range of information systems concepts on a firm empirical basis. Thus provides a foundation for information systems as a social science, rather than a branch of applied mathematics. The Core View includes the belief in an objective reality to which we have direct access via the supposedly transparent languages of words, numbers and diagrams, whereas the Social View, without rejecting that position, requires us to explain how we come to construct such knowledge. It also compels us to examine all the other functions we perform with information, especially our construction of social reality. Forced to examine these questions, we have to address many elusive problems, such as the creation of meanings, the role of intentional communication, the construction of time, and the systems of norms we call ‘organisation’. Finally, the paper re-works the Japan Wines case study used in the FRISCO Report. This shows that the Social View leads to a more detailed analysis of the business problems than the Core View, with as much formal precision, which lends itself to computer interpretation, while also yielding models that are easier for users to interpret.
The original version of this chapter was revised: The copyright line was incorrect. This has been corrected. The Erratum to this chapter is available at DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-35500-9_30
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Ades, Yasser, 1999, “Semantic Normal Form: Compliance” in Proc. Workshop on Organisational Semiotics, Almelo October 12–14, University of Twente.
Ernest, Paul, 1998, Social Constructivism as a Philosophy of Mathematics, New York, State University of NY.
Falkenberg, Eckhard, et a1,1998, A Framework of Information Systems Concepts,International Federation for Information Processing, ISBN 3–901882–01–4.
Feyeradend Paul, 1975, Against Method, London, Verso.
Gibson, James, J., 1979, The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, Houghton Mifflin, Boston
Hersh, Reuben, 1997, What is Mathematics Really, London, Vintage.
Hirshheim, Rudy, Heinz Klein and Kalle Lyytinen, 1995, Information Systems Development and Data Modelling: conceptual and philosophical foundations; Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Kitcher, Philip (1984), The Nature of Mathematical Knowledge,Oxford University Press.
Lakatos, Imre and Alan Musgrave, 1970, Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge, CUP.
Lakatos, Imré (1976), Proofs and Refutations, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Michaels, Claire F. and Claudia Carello, 1981, Direct Perception, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Popper, Sir Karl, 1959 (original 1935), The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Basic Books, New York.
Popper, Sir Karl, 1963, Conjectures and Refutations, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Sokal, Alan and Jean Bricmont, 1998, Intellectual Impostures, London, Profile Books.
Stamper, Ronald, 1973, Information in Business and Administrative Systems, Wiley, New York and Batsford, London.
Stamper, Ronald, 1985, A Logic of Social Norms and Individual Affordances, in Gilbert, N. and G. Heath (eds), Social Action and Artificial Intelligence, Gower Press, Aldershot.
Stamper, Ronald, 1989, Information Management, Enschede, University of Twente.
Stamper, Ronald, 1996, Signs, Norms and Information Systems, in Holmqvist B. et al (eds), Signs at Work, De Gruyter, Berlin.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stamper, R.K. (2000). Information Systems as a Social Science. In: Falkenberg, E.D., Lyytinen, K., Verrijn-Stuart, A.A. (eds) Information System Concepts: An Integrated Discipline Emerging. IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing, vol 36. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35500-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35500-9_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-5485-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-35500-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive