Abstract
The paper analyses which features of an agent architecture determine its Autonomy. I claim that Autonomy is a relational concept. First, Autonomy from environment (stimuli) is analysed, and the notion of Cognitive Reactivity is introduced to show how the cognitive architecture of the agent guarantees Stimulus-Autonomy and deals with the “Descartes problem” relative to the external “causes” of behaviour. Second, Social Autonomy is analysed (Autonomy from others). A distinction between Executive Autonomy and Motivational Autonomy is introduced. Some limitations that current postulates on Rational interacting agents could impose on their Autonomy are discussed. Architectural properties and postulates that guarantee a sufficient Autonomy in cognitive social agents are defined. These properties give the agent control over its own mental states (Beliefs and Goals). In particular, a “double filter” architecture against influence, is described. What guarantees agent's control over its own Beliefs is specified: relevance, credibility, introspective competence. Particular attention is devoted to the “non negotiability of beliefs” (Pascal law): the fact that you cannot change the other's Beliefs by using promises or threats. What guarantees agent's control over its Goals is specified: self-interested goal adoption, and indirect influencing. Finally, it is argued how and why social dependence and power relations should limit the agent's Autonomy.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Basso, A., Mondada, F., Castelfranchi, C. 1993. Reactive Goal Activation in Intelligent Autonomous Agent Architecture. In Proceedings of AIA'93 — First International Round-Table on “Abstract Intelligent Agent”, ENEA, Roma, January 25–27.
Brooks, R.A. 1989. A robot that walks. Emergent behaviours from a carefully evolved network. Tech. Rep. Artificial Intelligence Laboratory. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT.
C. Castelfranchi. No More Cooperation, Please! In Search of the Social Structure of Verbal Interaction. In A.I. and Cognitive Science Perspectives on Communication, Ortony, A., Slack, J., and Stock, O. (eds.) Heidelberg, Germany: Springer, 1992.
C. Castelfranchi. Principles of Bounded Autonomy. Modelling Autonomous Agents in a Multi Agent World. Pre-Proceedings of the Fist Round-Table Discussion on “Abstract Intelligent Agent” — AIA '93. Roma: Enea; TR-Ip/CNR, 1993.
C. Castelfranchi, M. Miceli, A. Cesta. Dependence relations among autonomous agents. In Decentralized AI — 3, Y. Demazeau, E. Werner (eds), 215–31. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1992.
N. Chomsky. Language and Problems of Knowledge: The Nicaraguan Lectures, Cambridge, Mass. MIT Press, 1988.
P. R. Cohen, H.J. Levesque. Rational Interaction as the Basis for Communication. Technical Report, n.89, CSLI, Stanford, 1987. A new version in Intentions in Communication., P.R Cohen, J. Morgan, M.A. Pollack (eds), 33–71. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1990.
P.R. Cohen, H. J. Levesque. Intention is choice with commitment. Artificial Intelligence, 42, pp. 213–261, 1990.
D. Connah, P. Wavish. An Experiment in Cooperation. In Decentralized AI, Y. Demazeau and J.P. Mueller (eds.), 197–212. North-Holland, Elsevier, 1990.
R. Conte, C. Castelfranchi. Cognitive and Social Action. London: UCL Press, (in press).
A.A. Covrigaru, R.K. Lindsay. Deterministic autonomous systems. AI Magazine, Fall, 1991, 110–17.
A.F. Dragoni. A Model for Belief Revision in a Multi-Agent Environment. In Decentralized AI — 3, Y. Demazeau, E. Werner (eds), 215–31. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1992.
E. H. Durfee, V. R. Lesser, D. D. Corkill. Cooperation through communication in a problem-solving network. In Distributed Artificial Intelligence, M.N. Huhns (ed.), 29–58. San Mateo, CA: Kaufmann, 1987.
J. R. Galliers. A strategic framework for multi-agent cooperative dialogue, in Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence London: Pitman, 1988, 415–20.
J. R. Galliers. Modelling Autonomous Belief Revision in Dialogue, In Decentralized AI-2, Y. Demazeau, J.P. Mueller (eds), 231–43. Armsterdam: Elsevier, 1991.
P. Gardenfors.The Dynamics of Belief Systems: Foundations vs Coherence Theories. Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 1989.
G. Gaspar. Communication and Belief Changes in a Society of Agents. In Decentralized AI-2, Y. Demazeau, J.P. Mueller (eds), 245–55. Armsterdam: Elsevier, 1991.
N. R. Jennings. Commitments and conventions: The foundation of coordination in multi-agent systems. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 3, 1993, 223–50.
Hewitt, C.& P. de Jong 1983. Open systems. In Perspectives on conceptual modeling, M.L. Brodie, J.L. Mylopoulos, J.W. Schmidt (eds), New York: Springer.
C. Hewitt. Open information systems semantics for distributed artificial intelligence. Artificial Intelligence, 47, 1991, 79–106.
B. A. Huberman, S. H. Clearwater, T. Hogg. Cooperative Solution of Constraint Satisfaction Problems. Science, vol. 254, Nov. 1991, 1181–2.
G. Kiss, H. Reichgelt. Towards a Semantics of Desires. In Decentralized AI-3, E. Werner & Y. Demazeau (eds.), 115–27. Armsterdam: Elsevier, 1992.
I. Levi. The Enterprise of Knowledge, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, 1980.
R. S. Michalski. Development of Learning Systems Able to Modify Their Knowledge Representation According to Their Goals. In AIA'94 — Second International Round-Table on “Abstract Intelligent Agent”, ENEA, Roma, February 1994, 23–25.
G. Miller, E. Galanter, K.H. Pribram. Plans and the structure of behavior, New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1960.
A. Rosenblueth, N. Wiener. Purposeful and Non-Purposeful Behavior. In Modern systems research for the behavioral scientist, Buckley, W. (ed.). Chicago: Aldine, 1968.
J. Sichman, R. Conte, R. C. Castelfranchi, Y. Demazeau. A Social Reasoning Mechanism Based On Dependence Networks, ECAI'94, Amsterdam, August 1994.
E. S. K. Yu, J. Mylopoulos. An Actor dependency model of organizational work with application to business process reengineering. In Proceedings of COOCS'93-Conference On Organizational Computing Systems, Milpitas, USA, 1993
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Castelfranchi, C. (1995). Guarantees for autonomy in cognitive agent architecture. In: Wooldridge, M.J., Jennings, N.R. (eds) Intelligent Agents. ATAL 1994. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 890. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-58855-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-58855-8_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-58855-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49129-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive