Skip to main content

An Intelligent Tutoring System Incorporating a Model of an Experienced Human Tutor

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2363))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Symbolization is the ability to translate a real world situation into the language of algebra. We believe that symbolization is the single most important skill students learn in high school algebra. We present research on what makes this skill difficult and report the discovery of a “hidden” skill in symbolization. Contrary to past research that has emphasized that symbolization is difficult due to both comprehension difficulties and the abstract nature of variables, we found that symbolization is difficult because it is the articulation in the “foreign” language of “algebra”. We also present Ms. Lindquist, an Intelligent Tutoring System (ITS) designed to carry on a tutorial dialog about symbolization. Ms. Lindquist has a separate tutorial model encoding pedagogical content knowledge in the form of different tutorial strategies, which were partially developed by observing an experienced human tutor. We discuss aspects of this human tutor’s method that can be modeled well by Ms. Lindquist. Finally, we present an early formative showing that students can learn from the dialogs Ms. Lindquist is able to engage student in. Ms. Lindquist has tutored over 600 students at www.AlgebraTutor.org.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, J. R. (1993). Rules of the Mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R., Boyle, D. F., & Reiser, B. J. (1985). Intelligent tutoring systems. Science, 228, 456–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., & Pelletier, R. (1995) Cognitive tutors: lessons learned. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(2), 167–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R. & Pelletier, R. (1991) A developmental system for model-tracing tutors. In Lawrence Birnbaum (Eds.) The International Conference on the Learning Sciences. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education. Charlottesville, Virginia (pp. 1–8).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clancey, W. J., (1982) Tutoring rules for guiding a case method dialog. In D. Sleeman & J. S. Brown (Eds.) Intelligent Tutoring Systems London: Academic Press. (pp. 201–226.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, A. T., and Anderson, J. R., (1995) Knowledge decomposition and subgoal reification in the ACT programming tutor. in Proceedings of Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 469–476)

    Google Scholar 

  • Conati, C., Larkin, J. and VanLehn, K. (1997) A computer framework to support self-explanation. In: du Bolay, B. and Mizoguchi, R.(Eds.) Proceedings of AI-ED 97 World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education. Vol. 39, pp. 279–276, Amsterdam: IO Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, R. (2000) Using a reactive planner as the basis for a dialogue agent. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Symposium (FLAIRS’ 00), Orlando.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gluck, K. (1999). Eye movements and algebra tutoring. Doctoral dissertation. Psychology Department, Carnegie Melon University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graesser, A.C., Wiemer-Hastings, P., Wiemer-Hastings, K., Harter, D., Person, N., & the TRG (in press). Using latent semantic analysis to evaluate the contributions of students in AutoTutor. Interactive Learning Environments.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heffernan, N. T. (2001). Intelligent Tutoring Systems have Forgotten the Tutor: Adding a Cognitive Model of an Experienced Human Tutor. Dissertation. Carnegie Mellon University, Computer Science Department. http://gs260.sp.cs.cmu.edu/diss

  • Heffernan, N. T., & Koedinger, K. R.(1997) The composition effect in symbolizing: the role of symbol production versus text comprehension. Proceeding of the Nineteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society 307–312. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heffernan, N. T., & Koedinger, K. R. (1998) A developmental model for algebra symbolization: The results of a difficulty factors assessment. In Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, (pp. 484–489). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koedinger, K. R., Anderson, J.R., Hadley, W.H., & Mark, M. A. (1997). Intelligent tutoring goes to school in the big city. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 8, 30–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koedinger, K. R., & Anderson, J. R. (1998). Illustrating principled design: The early evolution of a cognitive tutor for algebra symbolization. In Interactive Learning Environments, 5, 161–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koedinger, K. R. & Nathan, M. J. (submitted to). The real story behind story problems: Effects of representations on quantitative reasoning. Submitted to Cognitive Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • McArthur, D., Stasz, C., & Zmuidzinas, M. (1990) Tutoring techniques in algebra. Cognition and Instruction. 7 (pp. 197–244.)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. D. (1996) Discourse generation for instructional applications: Making computer-based tutors more like humans. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 7(2), 118–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A., Gamoran, M., Kessel, C., Leonard, M., Or-Bach, R., & Arcavi, A. (1992) Toward a comprehensive model of human tutoring in complex subject matter domains. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 11, 293–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • VanLehn, K, Anderson, J., Ashley, K., Chi. M., Corbett, A., Koedinger, K., Lesgold, A., Levin, L., Moore, M., and Pollack, M., NSF Grant 9720359. CIRCLE: Center for Interdisciplinary Research on Constructive Learning Environments. NSF Learning and Intelligent Systems Center. January, 1998 to January, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Heffernan, N.T., Koedinger, K.R. (2002). An Intelligent Tutoring System Incorporating a Model of an Experienced Human Tutor. In: Cerri, S.A., Gouardères, G., Paraguaçu, F. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2363. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-47987-2_61

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-47987-2_61

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43750-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47987-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics