Skip to main content

Semantic Commitment for Designing Ontologies: A Proposal

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management: Ontologies and the Semantic Web (EKAW 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2473))

Abstract

The French institute INA is interested in ontologies in order to describe the content of audiovisual documents. Methodologies and tools for building such objects exist, but few propose complete guidelines to help the user to organize the key components of ontologies: subsumption hierarchies. This article proposes to use a methodology introducing a clear semantic commitment to normalize the meaning of the concepts. We have implemented this methodology in an editor, DOE, complementary to other existing tools, and used it to develop several ontologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bouaud, J., Bachimont, B., Charlet, J., Zweigenbaum, P.: Methodological principles for structuring an ontology. In IJCAI-95 Workshop on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing, Montreal, Canada, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fernández, M., Gómez-Pérez, A. and Juristo, N.: Methontology: From Ontological Art Towards Ontological Engineering. In AAAI97 Spring Symposium Series on Ontological Engineering, 33–40, Stanford, California, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  3. In Gómez-Pérez, A. (editor): Notes for SIG on Enterprise Standard Ontology Environment. Second Ontoweb Meeting, Amsterdam, December 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Guarino, N. and Welty, C.: Evaluating Ontological Decisions with OntoClean. In Communications of the ACM, 45(2): 61–65.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rastier, F., Cavazza, M. and Abeillé, A.: Sémantique pour l’analyse. Masson, Paris, 1994.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Staab, S. and Maedche, A.: Ontology Engineering beyond the Modeling of Concepts and Relations. In 14 th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI’00), Workshop on Applications of Ontologies and Problem-Solving Methods, Berlin, Germany, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Uschold, M. and Grüninger, M.: Ontologies: Principles, Methods and Applications. Knowledge Engineering Review, (2), 93–155, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bachimont, B., Isaac, A., Troncy, R. (2002). Semantic Commitment for Designing Ontologies: A Proposal. In: Gómez-Pérez, A., Benjamins, V.R. (eds) Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management: Ontologies and the Semantic Web. EKAW 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2473. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45810-7_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45810-7_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-44268-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45810-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics