Skip to main content

A Logical Framework for Integrating Inconsistent Information in Multiple Databases

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Foundations of Information and Knowledge Systems (FoIKS 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2284))

Abstract

When integrating data coming from multiple different sources we are faced with the possibility of inconsistency in databases. In this paper, we use one of the paraconsistent logics introduced in [9,7] (LFI1) as a logical framework to model possibly inconsistent database instances obtained by integrating different sources.We propose a method based on the sound and complete tableau proof system of LFI1 to treat both the integration process and the evolution of the integrated database submitted to users updates. In order to treat the integrated database evolution, we introduce a kind of generalized database context, the evolutionary databases, which are databases having the capability of storing and manipulating inconsistent information and, at the same time, allowing integrity constraints to change in time. We argue that our approach is sufficiently general and can be applied in most circumstances where inconsistency may arise in databases.

Author (1) was supported by an individual research grant from CNPq (Brazil). Author (2) was partially supported by a grant from the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation (Germany), by CAPES (Brazil) and by an individual research grant from CNPq (Brazil). Author (3) was supported by the Research Fund of Ghent University, project BOF2001/GOA/008.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abiteboul, S., Hull, R. and Vianu, V.: Foundations of Databases, Addison-Wesley (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Agarwal, S., Keller, A. M., Wiederhold, G., Saraswat, K.: Flexible Relation: An Approach for Integrating Data from Multiple, Possibly Inconsistent Databases. Proceedings ICDE, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Arenas, M., Bertossi, L., Chomicki, J.: Consistent Query Answers in Inconsistent Databases. In Proc. of the 18th ACM Symposium on Principles of Database Systems, June 1999, Philadelphia, USA, pp 68–79.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Arenas, M., Bertossi, L., Chomicki, J.: Specifying and Querying Database Repairs using Logic Programs with Exceptions. In Proc. 4th International Conference on Flexible Query Aswering Systems, October 2000,Warsaw, Poland, Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baral, C., Kraus, S., Minker, J., Subrahmanian, V. S.: Combining knowledge bases consisting of first-order theories. Computational Intelligence, 8:45–71, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Blair, H., Subrahmanian, V.S.: Paraconsistent Logic Programming. Theoretical Computer Science, 68: 135–154, 1989. Also in Proc. Conf. on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science, (LNCS 287), 340-360, 1987. Integrity

    Google Scholar 

  7. Carnielli, W.A. and Marcos, J.: A taxonomy of C-systems To appear in: W. A. Carnielli, M. E. Coniglio, and I. M. L. D’Ottaviano, editors, Paraconsistency: The logical way to the inconsistent. Proceedings of the II World Congress on Paraconsistency (WCP2000). Marcel Dekker, 2001. http://www.cle.unicamp.br/e-prints/abstract 5.htm

  8. Carnielli, W.A. and Marcos, J.: Tableau systems for logics of formal inconsistency. In: H.R. Arabnia, editor, Proceedings of the 2001 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, (IC-AI 2001), v. II, p. 848–852. CSREA Press, USA, 2001. http://logica.rug.ac.be/~joao/tableauxLFIs.ps.zip

  9. Carnielli, W.A., Marcos, J., de Amo, S.: Formal Inconsistency and evolutionary databases. To appear in Logic and Logical Philosophy, 7/8, 2000. http://www.cle.unicamp.br/e-prints/abstract 6.htm

  10. Carnielli, W.A., de Amo, S.: A logic-based system for controlling inconsistencies in evolutionary databases. Proc. of the VI Workshop on Logic, Language, Information and Computation, (WoLLIC 99), Itatiaia, Brazil, 1998, pp.89–101.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Carnielli, Walter A.: Many-valued logics and plausible reasoning. Proceedings of International Symp. on Multiple-valued Logic, Charlotte, U.S.A.,pp. 328–335 IEEE Computer Society Press(1990)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Carnielli, W. A., Lima-Marques, M.: Reasoning under Inconsistent Knowledge. Journal of Applied Non-classical Logics, Vol. 2 (1), 1992, pp. 49–79.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Carnielli,Walter A.: Systematization of the finite many-valued through the method of tableaux.

    Google Scholar 

  14. da Costa, Newton C.A.: On the theory of inconsistent formal system, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, v. 11, pp. 497–510 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dreben, B., Goldburg, W.D.: The Decision Problem: Solvable Classes of Quantificational Formulas. Addison-Wesley, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dung, P.M.: Integrating Data from Possibly Inconsistency Databases. International Conference on Cooperative Information Systems, Brussels, Belgium, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fagin, R., Ullman, J. D., Vardi, M.: On the semantics of updates in databases. In 2nd ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD Symposium on Principles of Database Systems, pages352–365, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fagin, R.: Finite Model Theory: a Personal Perspective. Theoretical Computer Science, 116 (182):3–31, 1994.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Gallo, G., Rago, G.: The Satisfiability problem for the Schöenfinkel-Bernays fragment: Partial Instantiation and Hypergraph Algorithms TR 4/94, Dipartimento di Informatica, Università di Pisa, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gärdenfors, P.: Knowledge in Flux-Modeling the Dynamics of Epistemic States. MIT Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kifer, M., Lozinskii, E.L: A Logic for Reasoning with Inconsistency. Journal of Automated Reasoning 9: 179–215, 1992.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Subrahmanian, V.S.: Amalgamating knowledge bases. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 19(2)-1994.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Trakhtenbrot, B.A.: The impossibility of an algorithm for the decision problem for finite domains. (Russian), Doklady Akademii Nauk, SSSR (N.S.) 70, pp 569–572, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

de Amo, S., Carnielli, W.A., Marcos, J. (2002). A Logical Framework for Integrating Inconsistent Information in Multiple Databases. In: Eiter, T., Schewe, KD. (eds) Foundations of Information and Knowledge Systems. FoIKS 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2284. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45758-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45758-5_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43220-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45758-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics