Skip to main content

Russellian and Strawsonian Definite Descriptions in Situation Semantics

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing (CICLing 2001)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2004))

Abstract

In this paper I give two alternatives for representing the def- inite descriptions - Russellian and Strawsonian approaches realized in situation semantics. I show how the Russellian treatment of the definites can be made “referential”, while preserving its original generalized quan- tifier mode. The Strawsonian representation is substantially referential with presuppositional effect of the restriction imposed over the paramet- ric representative of the potential referent of the definite description. The situation theoretical restricted parameters, speakers’ reference functions in particular contexts of utterances, and the notion of a resource situa- tion for evaluating NPs are the key formal tools used. This work does not reject any of the two accounts in favor of the other, but shows how both approaches give better results in a theory which models partial- ity of the linguistic information, discourse dependency and in particular, speakers’ references. In both approaches, the prototypical definite NPs get appropriate “parametric” interpretations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aczel, P. and R. Lunnon. 1991. Universes and Parameters. In Seligman J. and D. Westerstahl, eds. Situation Theory and Its Applications. Vol. 1. CSLI Lecture Notes Number 37. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barwise, J. and R. Cooper. 1981. Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language. Linguistics and Philosophy 4 (1981):159–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Barwise, J. and J. Perry. 1983. Situations and Attitudes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Republished in 1999 by The David Hume Series of Philosophy and Cognitive Science Reissues.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barwise, J. 1986. Noun Phrases, Generalized Quantifiers and Anaphora. Generalized Quantifiers, ed. P. Gärdenfors. Studies in Language and Philosophy. Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Barwise, J. 1987. The situation in Logic. CSLI Lecture Notes Number 17. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cooper, R. 1993. Generalized Quantifiers and Resource Situations. in Aczel, P., D. Israel, Y. Katagiri, and St. Peters, eds. Situation Theory and Its Applications. Volume 3. CSLI Lecture Notes Number 37. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cooper, R. and J. Ginzburg. 1996. A Compositional Situation Semantics for Attitude Reports. in Seligman, J., and D. Westerstaahl, eds. Logic, Language and Computation. Volume 1. CSLI Lecture Notes Number 58. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Devlin, K. 1991. Logic and Information. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Henkin, L. 1950. Completeness in the theory of types. Journal of Symboli Logic. 15:81–91.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Leivant, D. 1994. Higher Order Logic. In Dov M. Gabbay (ed.), Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence. Oxford University Press. 230–321.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Loukanova, R. 1991. Situation Semantical Analyses of the Natural Language. Ph.D. dissertation. Moscow State University and Saratov State University.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Loukanova, R. 1999. Semantical Storage: a sample situational grammar. Indiana University. draft

    Google Scholar 

  13. Loukanova, R. and R. Cooper. 1999. Some Situation Theoretical Notions. Annuaire de l’Universite de Sofia “St. Kliment Ohridski”, Faculte de mathematiques et informatique, tome 87(1993), livre 1-mathematiques, 297–306.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Loukanova, R. 2000. Nominal Scope in Situation Semantics. CICLing-2000 Proceedings: Computational linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing by IPN Publishing House. Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mostowski, A. 1957. On a generalization of quantifiers. Fundamenta Mathematicae 44:12–36.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Russell, B. 1905. On denoting. Mind 14:479–493.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Loukanova, R. (2001). Russellian and Strawsonian Definite Descriptions in Situation Semantics. In: Gelbukh, A. (eds) Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing. CICLing 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2004. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44686-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44686-9_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-41687-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44686-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics