Abstract
Case base maintenance is one of the most important issues for current research in Case-Based Reasoning (CBR). In this paper, we outline two novel steps as part of the maintenance phase of the CBR process. The review step covers assessment and monitoring of the knowledge containers whereas the restore step actually modifies the contents of the containers according to recommendations resulting from the review step. Here, we focus our attention on the review step for the case base. For this purpose, we define several quality measures based on different case and case base properties that describe specific characteristics of the case base such as correctness, consistency, uniqueness, minimality, and incoherence. These measures allow an initial implementation of the review step for the case base container. We conclude the paper with an outline of future work to extend these aspects of maintenance in CBR.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agnar Aamodt and Enric Plaza. Case-based reasoning: Foundational issues, methodological variations, and system approaches. AI Communications, 7(1):39–59, 1994.
David W. Aha and Leonard A. Breslow. Refining conversational case libraries. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning, pages 267–278, 1997.
Mehmet Göker and Thomas Roth-Berghofer. The development and utilization of the case-based help-desk support system HOMER. Special Issue of the International Journal “Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence”, 12(6), 1999.
David B. Leake and David C. Wilson. Categorizing case-base maintenance: Dimensions and directions. In Proceedings of EWCBR-98, Advances in Case-Based Reasoning. Springer-Verlag, 1998.
David B. Leake and David C. Wilson. When experience is wrong: Examining CBR for changing tasks and environments. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning, 1999.
Kirsti Racine and Qiang Yang. On the consistency management of large case bases: the case for validation. In Proceedings of the AAAI-96 Workshop on Knowledge Base Validation, American Association for Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), 1996.
Kirsti Racine and Qiang Yang. Maintaining unstructured case bases. In Proceedings of the 1997 International Conference on Case Based Reasoning, pages 553–564, 1997.
Michael M. Richter. The knowledge contained in similarity measures. Invited Talk at the International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning, 1995.
Barry Smyth and Mark T. Keane. Remembering to forget: A competence-preserving deletion policy for case-based reasoning systems. In Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 377–382, 1995.
Barry Smyth and Elizabeth McKenna. A portrait of case competence: Modelling the competence of case-based reasoning systems. In Proceedings of the 4th European Workshop on Case-Based Reasoning., pages 208–220, 1998.
Jun Zhu and Qiang Yang. Remembering to add: Competence-preserving case addition policies for case base maintenance. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference in Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), 1999.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Reinartz, T., Iglezakis, I., Roth-Berghofer, T. (2000). On Quality Measures for Case Base Maintenance. In: Blanzieri, E., Portinale, L. (eds) Advances in Case-Based Reasoning. EWCBR 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1898. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44527-7_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44527-7_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-67933-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44527-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive