Abstract
In this paper, dynamic meta modeling is proposed as a new approach to the operational semantics of behavioral UML diagrams. The dynamic meta model extends the well-known static meta model by a speci.cation of the system’s dynamics by means of collaboration diagrams. In this way, it is possible to de.ne the behavior of UML diagrams within UML.
The conceptual idea is inherited from Plotkin’s structured operational semantics (SOS) paradigm, a style of semantics speci.cation for concurrent programming languages and process calculi: Collaboration diagrams are used as deduction rules to specify a goal-oriented interpreter for the language. The approach is exemplified using a fragment of UML statechart and object diagrams.
Formally, collaboration diagrams are interpreted as graph transformation rules. In this way, dynamic UML semantics can be both mathematically rigorous so as to enable formal specifications and proofs and, due to the use of UML notation, understandable without prior knowledge of heavy mathematic machinery. Thus, it can be used as a reference by tool developers, teachers, and advanced users.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M. Andries, G. Engels, A. Habel, B. Hoffmann, H.-J. Kreowski, S. Kuske, D. Plump, A. Schürr, and G. Taentzer. Graph transformation for specification and programming. Science of Computer Programming, 34:1–54, 1999.
R. Bardohl, G. Taentzer, M. Minas, and A. Schürr. Application of graph transformation to visual languages. In Ehrig et al. [6], pages 105–180.
R. Breu and R. Grosu. Relating events, messages, and methods of multiple threaded objects. JOOP, pages 8–14, January 2000.
A. Corradini, R. Heckel, and U. Montanari. Graphical operational semantics. In A. Corradini and R. Heckel, editors, Proc. ICALP2000 Workshop on Graph Transformation and Visual Modelling Techniques, Geneva, Switzerland, Geneva, July 2000. Carleton Scientific.
A. Corradini, U. Montanari, and F. Rossi. Graph processes. Fundamenta Informaticae, 26(3,4):241–266, 1996.
H. Ehrig, G. Engels, H.-J. Kreowski, and G. Rozenberg, editors. Handbook of Graph Grammars and Computing by Graph Transformation, Volume 2: Applications, Languages, and Tools. World Scientific, 1999.
H. Ehrig, H.-J. Kreowski, U. Montanari, and G. Rozenberg, editors. Handbook of Graph Grammars and Computing by Graph Transformation, Volume 3: Concurrency and Distribution. World Scientific, 1999.
G. Engels, R. Hücking, St. Sauer, and A. Wagner. UML collaboration diagrams and their transformation to Java. In R. France and B. Rumpe, editors, Proc.UML’99 Int. Conference, Fort Collins, CO, USA, volume 1723 of LNCS, pages 473–488. Springer Verlag, October 1999.
A. Evans and S. Kent. Core meta modelling semantics of UML: The pUML approach. In France and Rumpe [11], pages 140–155.
T. Fischer, J. Niere, L. Torunski, and A. Zündorf. Story diagrams: A new graph transformation language based on UML and Java. In H. Ehrig, G. Engels, H.-J. Kreowski, and G. Rozenberg, editors, Proc. 6th Int. Workshop on Theory and Application of Graph Transformation (TAGT’98), Paderborn, November 1998, volume 1764 of LNCS. SpringerVerlag, 2000.
R. France and B. Rumpe, editors. Proc. UML’99 — Beyond the Standard, volume 1723 of LNCS. Springer Verlag, 1999.
12. F. Gadducci and U. Montanari. The tile model. In G. Plotkin, C. Stirling, and M. Tofte, editors, Proof, Language and Interaction: Essays in Honour of Robin Milner. MIT Press, 1999.
M. Gogolla and F. Parisi-Presicce. State diagrams in UML — a formal semantics using graph transformation. In ICSE’98 Workshop on Precise Semantics of Modelling Techniques, 1998. Tech. Rep. TUM-I9803, TU München.
M. Gogolla and M. Richters. Equivalence rules for UML class diagrams. In P.-A. Muller and J. Bezivin, editors, Proc. UML’98 Workshop, pages 86–97. Universite de Haute-Alsace, Mulhouse, 1998.
A. Knapp. A formal semantics of UML interactions. In France and Rumpe [11], pages 116–130.
M. Korff. Single pushout transformations of equationally defined graph structures with applications to actor systems. In Proc. Graph Grammar Workshop, Dagstuhl, 1993, volume 776 of LNCS, pages 234–247. Springer Verlag, 1994.
J. Lillius and I. Paltor. Formalising UML state machines for model checking. In France and Rumpe [11], pages 430–445.
Object Management Group. Action semantics for the UML, November 1998. http://www.omg.org/pub/docs/ad/98-11-01.pdf.
Object Management Group. Analysis and design platform task forceff white paper on the profile mechanism, April 1999. http://www.omg.org/pub/docs/ad/99-04-07.pdf.
G. övergaard. Formal specification of object-oriented meta-modelling. In T. Maibaum, editor, Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering (FASE’00), Berlin, Germany, number 1783 in LNCS, pages 193–207. Springer Verlag, March/April 2000.
G. Plotkin. A structural approach to operational semantics. Technical Report DAIMI FN-19, Aarhus University, Computer Science Department, 1981.
G. Reggio, E. Astesiano, C. Choppy, and H. Hussmann. Analysing UML active classes and associated state machines — a lightweight formal approach. In T. Maibaum, editor, Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering (FASE’00), Berlin, Germany, number 1783 in LNCS, pages 127–146. Springer Verlag, March/April 2000.
G. Rozenberg, editor. Handbook of Graph Grammars and Computing by Graph Transformation, Volume 1: Foundations. World Scientific, 1997.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Engels, G., Hausmann, J.H., Heckel, R., Sauer, S. (2000). Dynamic Meta Modeling: A Graphical Approach to the Operational Semantics of Behavioral Diagrams in UML. In: Evans, A., Kent, S., Selic, B. (eds) ≪UML≫ 2000 — The Unified Modeling Language. UML 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1939. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-40011-7_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-40011-7_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-41133-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-40011-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive