Skip to main content

The Turing complexity of AF C*-algebras with lattice-ordered KO

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Computation Theory and Logic

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 270))

Abstract

Approximately finite-dimensional (AF) C⋆-algebras were introduced in 1972 by Bratteli, generalizing earlier work of Glimm and Dixmier. In a recent paper, the author presents a natural one-one correspondence between Lindenbaum algebras of the infinite-valued sentential calculus of Łukasiewicz, and AF C⋆-algebras whose Grothendieck group (KO) is lattice-ordered. Thus, any such algebra \(\mathfrak{A}\) can be encoded by some theory Φ in the Łukasiewicz calculus, and Φ uniquely determines \(\mathfrak{A}\), up to isomorphism. In the present paper, Glimm's universal UHF algebra, the Canonical Anticommutation Relation (CAR) algebra, and the Effros-Shen algebras corresponding to quadratic irrationals are explicitly coded by theories whose decision problems are solvable in deterministic polynomial time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bratteli O (1972) Inductive limits of finite dimensional C⋆-algebras. Trans Amer Math Soc 171: 195–234

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chang C C (1958) Algebraic analysis of many valued logics. Trans Amer Math Soc 88: 467–490

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cook S A (1971) The complexity of theorem proving procedures. In: Proceedings 3rd ACM Symp on Theory of Computing, pp. 151–158

    Google Scholar 

  4. Effros E G (1981) Dimensions and C⋆-algebras. CBMS Regional Conference Series in Math. vol 46 AMS, Providence RI

    Google Scholar 

  5. Effros E G,Rosenberg J (1978) C⋆-algebras with approximately inner flip. Pacific J Math 77: 417–443

    Google Scholar 

  6. Effros E G, Shen C-L (1980) Approximately finite C⋆-algebras and continued fractions. Indiana Univ Math J 29: 191–204

    Google Scholar 

  7. Garey M R, Johnson D S (1979) Computers and Intractability. W H Freeman, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  8. Glimm J G (1960) On a certain class of operator algebras. Trans Amer Math Soc 95: 318–340

    Google Scholar 

  9. Knuth D E (1981) The Art of Computer Programming. Seminumerical Algorithms, vol 2. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lang S (1966) Introduction to Diophantine Approximations. Addison-Wesley, Reading MA

    Google Scholar 

  11. McNaughton R (1951) A theorem about infinite-valued logic. J Symbolic Logic 16: 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mundici D (1986) Interpretation of AF C⋆-algebras in Łukasiewicz sentential calculus. J Functional Analysis 65: 15–63

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tarski A, Łukasiewicz J (1956) Investigations into the Sentential Calculus. In: Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 38–59.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Egon Börger

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mundici, D. (1987). The Turing complexity of AF C*-algebras with lattice-ordered KO . In: Börger, E. (eds) Computation Theory and Logic. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 270. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-18170-9_171

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-18170-9_171

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-18170-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47795-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics