Summary
Objective
Hydrostatic devices have considerable advantages compared to “conventional” differential-pressure-valves concerning overdrainage, but are thought to imply a tendency to underdrain or to clog. The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of the hydrostatic gravitational Dual-Switch-Valve (DSV) to minimize overdrainage-related complications without increasing the danger of underdrainage.
Results
In a series of 202 adult patients with different etiologies treated with a ventriculo-peritoneal shunt including the hydrostatic Dual-Switch-valve (DSV), 21 cases were suspected of suffering from underdrainage. Using a new algorithm we were able to differentiate obstruction in 6 patients from functional underdrainage in 15 cases, thus we saw an indication to reimplant a DSV with a lower opening pressure in the latter.
Conclusion
The reasons for functional underdrainage were multifold in our series, especially the intraperitoneal pressure is still a “black box”. Despite the ability of the DSV to avoid clogging and to minimize overdrainage by its high-pressure-chamber, it remains difficult to determine the optimal opening pressure of the low-pressure-chamber of the DSV for ideal clinical improvement. Therefore a new hydrostatic gravitational “programmable” valve (proGAV), entitled on avoiding the disadvantages of other adjustable devices, has been developed and implanted in 16 patients with promising results.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
References
Bergsnider M, Peacock WJ, Mazziotta JK, Becker DP (1999) Beneficial effect of siphoning in adult hydrocephalus. Arch Neurol 56: 1224–1229
Boon AJ, Tans JT, Delwel EJ, Egeler-Peerdeman SM, Hanlo PW, Wurzer HA, Avezaat CJJ, de Jong DA, Gooskens RHJM, Hermans J (1998) Dutch Normal-Pressure Hydrocephalus Study: randomized comparison of low-and medium-pressure shunts. J Neurosurg 88: 490–495
Di Rocco C, Marchese E, Velardi F (1994) A survey of the first complication of newly implanted CSF shunt devices for the treatment of nontumoral hydrocephalus. Child’s Nerv Syst 10: 321–327
Drake JM, Kestle JRW, Milner R, Cinalli G et al (1998) Randomized trial of cerebrospinal fluid shunt valve design in pediatric hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 43: 294–305
Hanlo PW, Cinalli G, Vandertop WP, Faber JA, Bogeskov L, Borgesen SE, Boschert J, Chumas P, Eder H, Pople IK, Serlo W, Vitzthum E (2003) Treatment of hydrocephalus determined by the European Orbis Sigma Valve II survey: a multicenter prospective 5-year shunt survival study in children and adults in whom a flow-regulating shunt was used. J Neurosurg 99(1): 52–57
Kiefer M, Eymann R, Meier U (2002) Five Years Experience with Gravitational Shunts in Chronic Hydrocephalus of Adults. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 144: 755–767
Mc Connell KA, Zou KH, Chabrerie AV, Bailey NO, Black P McL (2004) Decreases in ventricular volume correlate with decreases in ventricular pressure in idiopathic normal hydrocephalus patients who experienced clinical improvement after implantation with adjustable valve shunts. Neurosurgery 55: 582–593
Meier U, Kintzel D (2002) Clinical experiences with different valve systems in patients with normal-pressure hydrocephalus: Evaluation of the Miethke dual-switch valve. Child’s Nerv Syst 18: 288–294
Meier U, Paris S, Gräwe A, Stockheim D, Hajdukova A, Mutze S (2003) Is there a correlation between operative results and change in ventricular volume after shunt placement? A study of 60 cases of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neuroradiology 45: 377–380
Meier U, Kiefer M, Sprung C (2004) Evaluation of the Miethke Dual-Switch-Valve in patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus. Surg Neurol 61: 119–128
Miethke C, Affeld K (1994) A new valve for the treatment of hydrocephalus. Biomedizinische Technik 39: 181–187
Pang D, Altschuler E (1994) Low-pressure hydrocephalic state and viscoelastic alterations in the brain. Neurosurgery 35: 643–655
Pollack IF, Albright AL, Adelson PD, the Medos-Hakim Investigator Group (1999) A randomized study of a programmable shunt valve versus a conventional valve for patients with hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 45: 1399–1411
Richards HK, Seeley HM, Pickard JD (2001) Examining Received Wisdom for CSF Shunt Using the UK Shunt Registry. Eur J Pediatric Surg 11[Suppl] I: 60
Sainte-Rose C, Piatt JH, Renier D, Pierre-Kahn A, Hirsch JF, Hoffman HJ, Humphreys RP, Hendrick EB (1991) Mechanical complications in shunts. Pediatr Neurosurg 17: 2–9
Saint-Rose C (1993) Shunt obstruction: a preventable complication? Pediatric Neurosurg 19: 156–164
Sprung C, Miethke C, Trost HA, Lanksch WR, Stolke D (1996) The dual-switch-valve. A new hydrostatic valve for the treatment of hydrocephalus. Child’s Nerv Syst 12: 573–581
Sprung C, Miethke C, Shakeri K, Lanksch WR (1998) Pitfalls in shunting of hydrocephalus — clinical reality and improvement by the hydrostatic dual-switch valve. Eur J Pediatric Surg 8[Suppl] I: 1–3
Sprung C, Miethke C, Shakeri K, Lanksch WR (1999) Importance of intraventricentricular pressure and ventricular size for outcome of shunting. Proc of 25th Annual Meeting of EANS, ed Monduzzi, 1680–1684
Williams MA, Razumovsky AY, Hanley DF (1998) Evaluation of shunt function in patients who are never better, or better than worse after shunt surgery for NPH. Acta Neurochir [Suppl] 71: 368–370
Zemack G, Romner B (1999) Seven years of clinical experience with the Codman Hakim programmable valve: a retrospective study of 583 patients. J Neurosurg 92: 941–948
Zemack G, Romner B (2002) Adjustable valves in normal-pressure hydrocephalus: a retrospective study of 218 patients. Neurosurgery 51(6): 1392–1400
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer-Verlag
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sprung, C., Miethke, C., Schlosser, H.G., Brock, M. (2005). The enigma of underdrainage in shunting with hydrostatic valves and possible solutions. In: Poon, W.S., et al. Intracranial Pressure and Brain Monitoring XII. Acta Neurochirurgica Supplementum, vol 95. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-211-32318-X_47
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-211-32318-X_47
Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna
Print ISBN: 978-3-211-24336-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-211-32318-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)