Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Preston DM, Lennard-Jones JE, and Thomas BM. The balloon proctogram. Br J Surg. 1984;7:29–32.
Burhenne HJ. Intestinal evacuation study: a new roentgenologic technique. Radiol Clin N Am. 1964;33:79–84.
Mahieu P, Pringot J, and Bodart P. Defecography: I. Description of a new procedure and results in normal patients. Gastrointest Radiol. 1984;9:247–51.
Shorvon PJ, McHugh S, Diamant NE, Somers S, and Stevenson GW. Defecography in normal volunteers: results and implications. Gut. 1989;30:1737–49.
Bartram CI, Turnbull GK, and Lennard-Jones JE. Evacuation proctography: an investigation of rectal expulsion in 20 subjects without defecatory disturbance. Gastrointest Radiol. 1988;13:72–80.
Marti MC and Mirescu D. Utilité du défécogramme en proctologie. Ann Gastroenterol Hepatol (Paris). 1982;18:379–84.
Kuijpers HC. Defaecography. In: Wexner SD and Bartolo DC, editors. Constipation. Etiology, Evaluation and Management. London: Butterworth Heinemann; 1995. p. 77–86.
Jones HJ, Swift RI, and Blake H. A prospective audit of the usefulness of evacuating proctography. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1998;80:40–5.
Harvey CJ, Halligan S, Bartram CI, Hollings N, Sahdev A, and Kingston K. Evacuation proctography: a prospective study of diagnostic and therapeutic effects. Radiology. 1999;211:223–7.
McKee RF, McEnroe L, Anderson JH, and Finlay IG. Identification of patients likely to benefit from biofeedback for outlet obstruction constipation. Br J Surg. 1999;86:355–9.
Zbar AP, Lienemann A, Fritsch H, Beer-Gabel M, and Pescatori M. Rectocele: pathogenesis and surgical management. Int J Colorect Dis. 2003;18:369–84.
Ekberg O, Hjelmqvist B, Leandoer L, et al. Rectal prolapse and internal intussusception, the role of defaecography in pre-and postoperative evaluation. J Med Imaging. 1988;2:88–92.
Sadry F, Mirescu D, and Marti M-C. L’exploration radiologique des troubles de la défécation. In: Bessler W, et al., editors. Neue aspekte radiologischer diagnostik und therapie. Huber, Bern: Jahrbuch; 1986. p. 8–91.
Rafert JA, Lappas JC, and Wilkins W. Defecography: techniques for improved image quality. Radiol Technol. 1990;61:368–73.
Boccasanta P, Venturi M, Calabrò G, Trompetto M, Ganio E, Tessera G, Bottini C, Pulvirenti D’Urso A, Ayabaca S, and Pescatori M. Which surgical approach for rectocele? A multicentric report from Italian coloproctologists. Tech Coloproctol. 2001;5:149–56.
Mulder W, de-Jong E, Wanters I, Kinders M, Heij HA, and Vos A. Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty: functional results of primary and secondary operations in comparison to the pull-through method in anorectal malformations. Eur J Paediatr Surg. 1995;5:170–3.
Halligan S, Nicholls RJ, and Bartram CI. Proctographic changes after rectopexy for solitary rectal ulcer syndrome and preoperative predictive factors for a successful outcome. Br J Surg. 1995;82:314–17.
Goei R, Beaten C, and Arends JW. Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome: findings at barium enema study and defaecography. Radiology. 1988;168:303–6.
Hare C, Halligan S, Bartram CI, Gupta R, Walker AE, and Renfrew I. Dose reduction in evacuation proctography. Eur Radiol. 2001;11(3):432–4.
Low VH, Ho LM, and Freed KS. Vaginal opacification during defecography: direction of vaginal migration aids in diagnosis of pelvic floor pathology. Abdom Imaging. 1999;24:565–8.
Dietz HP and Clarke B. the influence of posture on perineal ultrasound imaging parameters. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2001;12:104–6.
Bernier P, Stevenson GW, and Shorvon P. Defecography commode. Radiology. 1988;166:891–2.
Ikenberry S, Lappas JC, Hana MP, and Rex DK. Defecography in healthy subjects: comparison of three contrast media. Radiology. 1996;201(1):233–8.
Pelsang RE, Rao SS, and Welcher K. FECOM, a new artificial stool for evaluating defecation. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:183–6.
Ginai AZ. Evacuation proctography (defecography). A new seat and method of examination. Clin Radiol. 1990;42(3):214–16.
Beer-Gabel M, Teshler M, Barzilai N, Lurie Y, Malnick S, Bass D, and Zbar A. Dynamic transperineal ultrasound in the diagnosis of pelvic floor disorders. Pilot study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45:239–48.
Schoenenberger AW, Debatin JF, Guldenschuh I, Hany TF, Steiner P, and Krestin GP. Dynamic MR defecography with a superconducting, open-configuration MR system. Radiology. 1998;206:641–6.
Beer-Gabel M, Teshler M, Schechtman E, and Zbar AP. Dynamic transperineal ultrasound vs. defecography in patients with evacuatory difficulty: a pilot study. Int J Colorectal Dis. In press 2003.
Selvaggi F, Pesce G, Scotto Di Carlo E, Maffettone V, and Canonico S. Evaluation of normal subjects by defecographic technique. Dis Colon Rectum. 1990;33(8):698–702.
LeSaffer LPA. Defecography—Update 1994. The model of expulsion, digital subtraction cysto-colpo-enter-defecography and the perineal support device [thesis]. Belgium: ASZ Aalst Belgium Story-Scientia Gent.
Poon FW, Lauder JC, and Finlay IG. Technical report: evacuating proctography—a simplified technique. Clin Radiol. 1991;44(2):113–6.
Chen HH, Iroatulam A, Alabaz O, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, and Wexner SD. Associations of defecography and physiologic findings in male patients with rectocele. Tech Coloproctol. 2001;5:157–61.
Halligan S and Bartram CI. Evacuation proctography combined with positive contrast peritoneography to demonstrate pelvic floor hernias. Abdom Imaging. 1995;20(5):442–5.
Bremmer S, Mellgren A, Holmstrom B, and Uden R. Peritoneocele: visualization with defecography and peritoneography performed simultaneously. Radiology. 1998;202:373–7.
Bremmer S. Peritoneocele: a radiologic study with defaeco-peritoneography. Acta Radiol. 1998;413(Suppl):1–33.
Lienemann A, Anthuber C, Baron A, and Reiser M. Diagnosing enteroceles using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:205–13.
Karlbom U, Nilsson S, Pahlman L, and Graf W. Defecogaphic study of rectal evacuation in constipated and control subjects. Radiology. 1999;210:103–8.
LeSaffer LPA. Digital subtraction defecography. In: Smith LE, editor. Practical guide to anorectal testing. 2nd ed. New York: Igaku-Shoin; 1995. p. 161–84.
Brady AP, Somers S, Hough D, and Stevenson GW. Digital subtraction in defecography. Abdom Imaging. 1995;20:245–7.
Kelvin FM, Hale DS, Maglinte DD, Patten BJ, and Benson JT. Female pelvic organ prolapse: diagnostic contribution of dynamic cystoproctography and comparison with physical examination. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;173:31–7.
Healy JC, Halligan S, Reznek RH, Watson S, Bartram CI, Phillips R, and Armstrong P. Dynamic MR imaging compared with evacuation proctography when evaluating anorectal configuration and pelvic floor movement. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;169(3):775–9.
Lamb GM, de Jode MG, Gould SW, Spouse E, Birnie K, Darzi A, and Gedroyc WM. Upright dynamic MR defaecating proctography in an open configuration MR system. Br J Radiol. 2000;73(866):152–5.
Lienemann A, Anthuber C, Baron A, Kohz P, and Reiser M. Dynamic MR colpocystorectography assessing pelvic floor descent. Eur Radiol. 1997;7:1309–17.
Lienemann A. An easy approach to functional magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic floor disorders. Tech Coloproctol. 1998;2:131–4.
Law PA, Danin JC, lamb GM, Regan L, Darzi A, and Gedroyc WM. Dynamic imaging of the pelvic floor using an open-configuration magnetic resonance scanner. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;13:923–9.
Bertschinger KM, Hetzer FH, Roos JE, Treiber K, Marincek B, and Hilfiker PR. Dynamic MR imaging of the pelvic floor performed with patient sitting in an open-magnet unit versus with patien t supine in a closed-magnet unit. Radiology. 2002;223:501–8.
Healy JC, Halligan S, Reznek RH, Watson S, Bartram CI, Phillips R, and Armstrong P. Dynamic MR imaging compared with evacuation proctography when evaluating anorectal configuration and pelvic floor movement. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;169:775–9.
Wald A, Jafri F, Rehder J, and Holeva K. Scintigraphic studies of rectal emptying in patients with constipation and defecatory difficulty. Dig Dis Sci. 1993;38(2):353–8.
Hutchinson R, Mostafa AB, Grant EA, Smith NB, Deen KI, Harding LK, and Kumar D. Scintigraphic defecography: quantitative and dynamic assessment of anorectal function. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36:1132–8.
Kenton K, Shott S, and Brubaker L. The anatomic and functional variability of rectoceles in women. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1999;10:223–9.
Ting KH, Mangel E, Eibl-Eibesfeldt B, and Muller-Lissner SA. Is the volume retained after defecation a valuable parameter at defecography. Dis Colon Rectum. 1992;35:762–8.
Halligan S and Bartram CI. Is barium trapping in rectoceles significant? Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;38:764–8.
Marti MC, Roche B, and Deleval J. Rectoceles: value of video-defecography in selection of treatment policy. Colorectal Dis. 1999;1:324–9.
van Dam JH, Schouten WR, Ginai AZ, Huisman WM, and Hop WC. The impact of anismus on the clinical outcome of rectocele repair. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1996;11:238–42.
Tjandra JJ, Ooi BS, Tang CL, Dwyer P, and Carey M. Transanal repair of rectocele corrects obstructed defaecation if it is not associated with anismus. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42:1544–50.
Pinho M, Yoshioka K, Ortiz J, Oya M, and Keighley MR. The effect of age on pelvic floor dynamics. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1990;5:207–8.
Skomorowska E, Hegedus V, and Christiansen J. Evaluation of perineal descent by defaecography. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1988;3:191–4.
Jorge JM, Wexner SD, Ehrenpreis ED, Nogueras JJ, and Jagelman DG. Does perineal descent correlate with pudendal neuropathy? Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36:475–83.
Halligan S, Thomas J, and Bartram C. Intrarectal pressures and balloon expulsion related to evacuation proctography. Gut. 1995;37:100–4.
Pinho M, Yoshioka K, and Keighley MR. Are pelvic floor movements abnormal in disordered defecation? Dis Colon Rectum. 1991;34:1117–19.
Parks AG, Porter NH, and Hardcastle J. The syndrome of the descending perineum. Proc R Soc Med. 1966;59:477–82.
Mellgren A, Johansson C, Dolk A, Anzen B, Bremmer S, Nilsson BY, and Homstrom B. Enterocele demonstrated by defecography is associated with other pelvic floor disorders. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1994;9:121–4.
Cuthbertson AM. Concealed rectal prolapse. Aust N Z J Surg. 1980;50:116–17.
Allen-Mersh TG, Henry MM, and Nicholls RJ. Natural history of anterior mucosal prolapse. Br J Surg. 1987;74:679–82.
Pescatori M and Quondamcarlo C. A new grading of rectal internal mucosal prolapse and its correlation with diagnosis and treatment. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1999;14:245–9.
Halligan S, McGee S, and Bartram CI. Quantification of evacuation proctography. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994;37:1151–4.
Penninckx F, Debruyne C, Lestar B, and Kerremans R. Intraobserver variation in the radiological measurement of the anorectal angle. Gastrointest Radiol. 1991;16:73–6.
Halligan S, Bartram CI, Park HJ, and Kamm MA. Proctographic features of anismus. Radiology. 1995;197:679–82.
Felt-Bersma RJ, Luth WJ, Janssen JJ, and Meuwissen SG. Defecography in patients with anorectal disorders. Which findings are clinically relevant? Dis Colon Rectum. 1990;33:277–84.
Halligan S, Malouf A, Bartram CI, Marshall M, Hollings N, and Kamm MA. Predictive value of impaired evacuation at proctography in diagnosing anismus. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;177:633–6.
Jorge JM, Wexner SD, Ger GC, Salanga VD, Nogueras JJ, and Jagelman DG. Cinedefecography and electromyography in the diagnosis of nonrelaxing puborectalis syndrome. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36:668–76.
Borstad E, Skrede M, and Rud T. Failure to predict and attempts to explain urinary stress incontinence following vaginal repair in continent women by using a modified lateral urethrocystography. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1991;70:501–6.
Savoye G, Leroi AM, Bertot-Sassigneux P, Touchais Y, Devreoede G, and Denis P. Does water-perfused catheter overdiagnose anismus compared to balloon probe. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2002;37:1411–16.
Duthie GS and Bartolo DC. Anismus: the cause of constipation? Results of investigation and treatment [review]. World J Surg. 1992;16:831–5.
Marshall M, Halligan S, Fotheringham T, and Bartram CI. Predictive value of internal anal sphincter thickness for diagnosis of rectal intussusception. Br J Surg. 2002;89:1281–5.
Sitzler PJ, Kamm MA, Nicholls RJ, and McKee RF. Long-term clinical outcome of surgery for solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Br J Surg. 1998;85:1246–50.
deSouza NM, Gilderdale DJ, MacIver DK, and Ward HC. High resolution magnetic resonance imaging of the anal sphincter in children: a pilot study using endoreceiver coils. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;169:201–6.
Zbar AP and deSouza NM. The Anal Sphincter. In: deSouza NM, editor. Endocavitary MRI of the pelvis. Australia: Harwood Academic Publishers; 2001. p. 91–109.
Senapati A. Rectal prolapse. In: Phillips RKS, editor. A companion to specialist surgical practice colorectal surgery. 2nd ed. London: WB Saunders; 2001. p. 251–71.
Husa A, Sainio P, and von Smitten K. Abdominal rectopexy and sigmoid resection (Frykman-Goldberg operation) for rectal prolapse. Acta Chir Scand. 1988;154:221–4.
Zbar AP, Takashima S, Hasegawa T, and Kitabayashi K. Perineral rectosigmoidectomy (Altemeier’s procedure): a review of physiology, technique and outcome. Tech Coloproctol. 2002;6:109–16.
Hida J, Yasutomi M, Maruyama T, Yoshifuji T, Tokoro T, Wakano T, Uchida T, and Ueda K. Detection of a rectocele-like prolapse in the colonic J pouch using pouchography: cause or effect of evacuation difficulties. Surg Today. 1999;29:1237–42.
Seggerman RE, Chen MY, Waters GS, and Ott DJ. Pictorial essay. Radiology of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis surgery. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180:999–1002.
Jarvinen HJ and Luukkonen P. Comparison of restorative proctocolectomy with and without covering ileostomy in ulcerative colitis. Br J Surg. 1991;78:199–201.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shorvon, P.J., Marshall, M.M. (2005). Evacuation Proctography. In: Complex Anorectal Disorders. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-057-5_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-057-5_12
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-690-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-057-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)