Skip to main content

Assessing Bank and Bank Branch Performance

Modeling Considerations and Approaches

  • Chapter
Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis

Abstract

The Banking industry has been the object of DEA analyses by a significant number of researchers and probably is the most heavily studied of all business sectors. The Financial Services Industry is a great subject because both the need by management is there (due to competition) and the data is available in great detail affording the analyst much scope for study. Moreover, there are interestign challenges presented because there are many influences on this industry that must be accounted for in the models. Many new theoretical innovations in DEA were spawned by the need that arose because of the unusual situation at hand.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aggarwall, V., 1996, Performance Analysis of Large Canadian Banks over Time using DEA”, MASc Dissertation, Centre for Management of Technology and Entrepreneurship.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Akhavein, J.D., Berger, A.N., and Humphrey, D.B., 1997, The Effects of Megamergers on Efficiency and Prices: Evidence from A Bank Profit Function, Review of Industrial Organizations 12, 95–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Al-Faraj, T.N., Alidi, A.S., and Bu-Bshait, K.A., 1993, Evaluation of Bank Branches By Means of Data Envelopment Analysis, International Journal of Operations and Production Management 13,No. 9, 45–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Athanassopoulos, A.D., 1997, Service Quality and Operating Efficiency Synergies for Management in The Provision of Financial Services: Evidence from Greek Bank Branches, European Journal of Operational Research 98, 300–313.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Athanassopoulos, A.D., 1998, Non-Parametric Frontier Models for Assessing the Market and Cost Efficiency of Large-Scale Bank Branch Networks, Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 30,No. 2, 172–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Athanassopoulos, A.D., 2000, An Optimization Framework of the Triad: Service Capabilities, Customer Satisfaction and Performance, In: P.T. Harker, and SA. Zenios (Eds.), Performance of Financial Institutions, Cambridge University Press,Cambridge, England, 312–335.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Athanassopoulos, A.D., and Giokas, D., 2000, The Use of Data Envelopment Analysis in Banking Institutions: Evidence from the Commercial Bank of Greece, Interfaces 30,No. 2, 81–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Avkiran, N.K., 1999, The Evidence on Efficiency Gains: The Role of Mergers and the Benefits to the Public, Journal of Banking and Finance 23, 991–1013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Banker, R.D., and Morey, R., 1986, The Use of Categorical Variables in Data Envelopment Analysis, Management Science, 32(12), 1613–1627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bauer, P.W., 1990, Recent Developments in the Econometric Estimation of Frontiers, Journal of Econometrics 46, 39–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Berg, S.A., Førsund, F.R. and Jansen, E.S., 1992, Malmquist Indices of Productivity Growth During the Deregulation of Norwegian Banking, 1980-89, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, vol. 94 (Supplement)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Berger, A.N., and DeYoung, R., 1996, Problem Loans and Cost Efficiency in Commercial Banks, Working Paper, 96-01, Wharton Financial Institutions Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Berger, A.N, Hancock, D. and Humphrey, D.B., 1993, Bank Efficiency Derived from the Profit Function, Journal of Banking and Finance 17,No. 2/3, 317–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Berger, A.N., Hunter, W.C., and Timme, S.G., 1993, The Efficiency of Financial Institutions: A Review and Preview of Research Past, Present, And Future, Journal of Banking and Finance 17, 221–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Berger, A.N., and Humphrey, D.B., 1990, Measurement and Efficiency Issues in Commercial Banking, Finance and Economic Discussion Series, Working Paper #151, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Berger, A.N. and Humphrey, D.B., 1991, The Dominance of Inefficiencies over Scale and Product Mix Economies in Banking, Journal of Monetary Economics 28,No. 1, 117–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Berger, A.N. and Humphrey, D.B., 1997, Efficiency of Financial Institutions: International Survey and Directions For Future Research, European Journal of Operational Research 98, 175–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Berger, A.N., 1998, The Efficiency Effects of Bank Mergers and Acquisitions: A Preliminary Look at The 1990s Data, In: Amihud, Y., And Miller, G. (Eds.), Bank Mergers and Acquisitions, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 79–111.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bhattacharyya, A., Lovell, C.A.K., and Sahay, P., 1997, The Impact of Liberalization on the Productive Efficiency of Indian Commercial Banks, European Journal of Operations Research 98, 333–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bukh, P.N.D., Berg, S.A., and Førsund, F.R., 1995, Banking Efficiency in the Nordic Countries: A Four-country Malmquist Index Analysis, Working paper, University of Aarhus, Denmark

    Google Scholar 

  21. Camanho, A.S. and Dyson, R.G., 1999, Efficiency, Size, Benchmarks and Targets for Bank Branches: an Application of Data Envelopment Analysis, Journal of The Operational Research Society 50, 903–915.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Caves, D. W., Christensen, L. R. and Diewert, W. E., 1982, The Economic Theory of Index Numbers and the Measurement of Input, Output and Productivity, Econometrica, 50, 1393–1414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chang, K.P., 1999, “Measuring Efficiency with Quasiconcave Production Frontiers”, European Journal of Operational Research, 115(3), 497–506.

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper, A.Y. Lewin and L.M. Seiford (eds.), 1994, Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Clark, J.A., 1996, Economic Cost, Scale Efficiency, and Competitive Viability in Banking, Journal of Money, Banking and Credit 28,No. 3, 342–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Coelli, T., Rao, D.SP. and Battese, G. E. 1998 An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Colwell, R.J., Davis, E.P., 1992, Output and Productivity in Banking, Scandinavian Journal of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cook, W.D., Hababou, M. and Tuenter, H.J., 2000, Multicomponent Efficiency Measurement and Shared Inputs in Data Envelopment Analysis: an Application to Sales and Service Performance in Bank Branches, Journal of Productivity Analysis 14, 209–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L.M. and Tone, K. (eds.), 2000, Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References, and DEA-Solver Software, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  30. DeYoung, R., 1993, Determinants of Cost Efficiencies in Bank Mergers, Economic and Policy Analysis, Working Paper 93-01, Washington: Office ofthe Comptroller of the Currency.

    Google Scholar 

  31. DeYoung, R., 1997, A Diagnostic Test for the Distribution-Free Efficiency Estimator: An Example Using U.S. Commercial Bank Data, European Journal of Operational Research 98,No. 2, 243–249.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. DeYoung, R., 1998, Management Quality and X-Inefficiency in National Banks, Journal of Financial Services Research 13,No. 1,5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Drake, L. and Howcroft, B., 1994, Relative Efficiency in The Branch Network of a UK Bank: An Empirical Study, Omega 22,No. 1, 83–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Favero, C., and Papi, L., 1995, Technical Efficiency and Scale Efficiency in the Italian Banking Sector: a Non-Parametric Approach, Applied Economics, 27, 385–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Norris, M. and Zhang, Z., 1994, Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Changes in Industrialized Countries, American Economic Review, 84, 66–83.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Fixler, D.J. and Zieschang, K.D., 1993, An Index Number Approach to Measuring Bank Efficiency: An Application to Mergers, Journal of Banking and Finance 17,437–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Fixler, D., and Zieschang, K., 1999, The Productivity ofthe Banking Sector: Integrating Financial and Production Approaches to Measuring Financial Service Output, Canadian Journal of Economics, 32,No. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Fukuyama, H., 1993, Technical and Scale Efficiency of Japanese Commercial Banks: A Non-Parametric Approach, Applied Economics 25, 1101–1112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Giokas, D., 1991, Bank Branch Operating Efficiency: A Comparative Application ofDEA and the Log-Linear Model, Omega 19,No. 6, 549–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Golany, B. and Storbeck, J.E., 1999, A Data Envelopment Analysis of the Operation Efficiency of Bank Branches, Interfaces 29,No. 3, 14–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Grabowski, R., Mathur, I. and Rangan, N., 1995, The Role of Takeovers in Increasing Efficiency, Managerial and Decision Economics 16,No. 3, 211–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Haag, S.E. and Jaska, P.V., 1995, Interpreting Inefficiency Ratings: An Application of Bank Branch Operating Efficiencies, Managerial and Decision Economics 16,No. 1, 7–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Hao, J., Hunter, W.C. and Yang, W.K., 2001, Deregulation and Efficiency: The Case of Private Korean Banks, Journal of Economics and Business 53,No. 2/3, 237–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Haynes, M. and Thompson, S., 1999, The Productivity Effects of Bank Mergers: Evidence from the UK Building Societies, Journal of Banking and Finance 23, 825–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Kantor, J. and Maital, S., 1999, Measuring Efficiency by Product Group: Integrating DEA with Activity-Based Accounting in A Large Mideast Bank, Interfaces 29,No. 3, 27–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Kaparakis, E.I., Miller, S.M. and Noulas, A.G., 1994, Short-Run Cost Inefficiency of Commercial Banks: A Flexible Stochastic Frontier Approach, Journal of Money, Credit And Banking 26,No. 4, 875–894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Kinsella, R.P., 1980, The Measurement of Bank Output, Journal of the Institute of Bankers in Ireland, 82, pp. 173–183.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Lovell, C.A.K. and Pastor, J.T., 1997, Target Setting: An Application to a Bank Branch Network, European Journal of Operational Research 98, 290–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Malmquist, S. 1953, Index Numbers and Indifference Surfaces, Trabajos de Estatistica, 4, 209–42.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  50. Nash, D. and Sterna-Karwat, A., 1996, An Application of DEA To Measure Branch Cross Selling Efficiency, Computers Operations Research 23,No. 4, 385–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Oral, M., Kettani, O. and Yolalan, R., 1992, An Empirical Study on Analyzing the Productivity of Bank Branches, IIE Transactions 24 No 5.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Oral, M. and Yolalan, R., 1990, An Empirical Study on Measuring Operating Efficiency and Profitability of Bank Branches, European Journal of Operational Research 46, 282–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Paradi, J. C. and Schaffnit, C., 2003, Commercial Branch Performance Evaluation and Results Communication in a Canadian Bank — a DEA Application. Accepted for publication in the European Journal of Operational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Parkan, C., 1987, Measuring The Efficiency of Service Operations: An Application to Bank Branches, Engineering Costs and Production Economics 12, 237–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Pastor, J., Perez, F., and Quesada, J. 1997, Efficiency Analysis in Banking Firms: An International Comparison, European Journal of Operations Research 98, 396–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Peristiani, S., 1993, Evaluating The Postmerger X-Efficiency And Scale Efficiency of U.S. Banks, Federal Reserve Bank Of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Peristiani, S., 1997, Do Mergers Improve the X-Efficiency and Scale Efficiency of U.S. Banks? Evidence from the 1980s, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 29,No. 3, 326–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Resti, A., 1998, Regulation Can Foster Mergers, Can Mergers Foster Efficiency? The Italian Case, Journal of Economics and Business 50, 157–169.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Rouatt, S., 2003, Two Stage Evaluation of Bank Branch Efficiency Using Data Envelopment Analysis, MASc Dissertation, Centre for Management of Technology and Entrepreneurship.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Schaffnit, C, Rosen, D. and Paradi, J.C., 1997, Best Practice Analysis of Bank Branches: An Application of DEA in a Large Canadian Bank, European Journal of Operational Research 98,No. 2, 269–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Sherman, H.D. and Ladino, G., 1995, Managing Bank Productivity Using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), Interfaces 25,No. 2, 60–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Sherman, H.D. and Gold, F., 1985, Bank Branch Operating Efficiency: Evaluation with Data Envelopment Analysis, Journal of Banking and Finance 9,No. 2, 297–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Smith, P., 1990, Data Envelopment Analysis Applied to Financial Statements, OMEGA International Journal of Management Science, 18(2), pp. 131–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Soteriou, A.C. and Stavrinides, Y., 1997, An Internal Customer Service Quality Data Envelopment Analysis Model for Bank Branches, International Journal of Operations and Production Management 17,No. 8, 780–789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Soteriou, A., and Zenios, S.A., 1999, Operations, Quality, and Profitability in the Provision of Banking Services, Management Science 45,No. 9, 1221–1238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Sowlati, T. and Paradi, J. C. 2003, Establishing the “Practical Frontier” in Data Envelopment Analysis, Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Thompson, R. G., Brinkmann, E. J., Dharmapala, P. S, Gonzales-Lima. M. D., and Thrall, R. M., 1997, DEA/AR Profit Ratios and Sensitivity of 100 Large U. S. Banks, European Journal of Operations Research 98, 213–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Tulkens, H., 1993, On FDH Efficiency Analysis: Some Methodological Issues and Applications to Retail Banking, Courts and Urban Transit, Journal of Productivity Analysis 4,No. 1/2, 183–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Vance, H., 2000, Opportunity Index Development for Bank Branch Networks, MASc Dissertation, Centre for Management of Technology and Entrepreneurship.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Vander Vennet, R., 1996, The Effect of Mergers and Acquisitions on the Efficiency and Profitability ofEC Credit Institutions, Journal of Banking and Finance 20, 1531–1558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Vassiloglou, M. and Giokas, D., 1990, A Study of The Relative Efficiency of Bank Branches: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis, Journal of The Operational Research Society 41,No. 7, 591–597.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Vela, S. and Paradi, J. C., 2002, Measuring the Effects of Cultural Differences in Bank Branch Performance Utilizing DEA, Working paper, Centre for Management of Technology and Entrepreneurship.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Yang, Z. and Paradi, J. C., 2003, Evaluating Competitive Banking Units Using “Handicapped” Data Envelopment Analysis to Adjust for Systemic Differences. Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Yue, P., 1992, Data Envelopment Analysis and Commercial Bank Performance: A Primer with Applications to Missouri Banks, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, Vol. 74-1.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Zenios, C.V., Zenios, S.A., Agathocleous, K. and Soteriou, A.C., 1999, Benchmarks of the Efficiency of Bank Branches, Interfaces 29,No. 3, 37–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Paradi, J.C., Vela, S., Yang, Z. (2004). Assessing Bank and Bank Branch Performance. In: Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L.M., Zhu, J. (eds) Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 71. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-7798-X_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-7798-X_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-7797-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-7798-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics