Abstract
Several factors such as rainfall, primary productivity, and plant species richness have been hypothesized to affect consumer species richness, possibly explaining differences in species richness among communities and on different continents. Primary productivity in particular has been suggested as important in determining species richness of consumer taxa, such as the primates, in the Neotropics. Here I contrast the floristics and phenological patterns of two Amazonian rainforest sites that differ markedly in primary productivity and yet have the same number of primate species: 1) an oligotrophic site—caatinga forests of Pico da Neblina National Park; and 2) a eutrophic site—várzea forests of Mamirauá. The objective of this comparison is to see how primary productivity interacts with floristics and phenology and ultimately, with primate species richness. With only 4 species each, the compared sites are characterized by low primate species richness. At both sites, low numbers of primate species are associated with an unusually low abundance of important primate food plants such as trees from the Burseraceae, Moraceae, Myristicaceae, Palmae and Sapotaceae. Moreover, in Neblina there is a long period of fruit scarcity and an overall low availability of fleshy fruits, which probably also contributes to the observed low primate species richness. In contrast, productivity in Mamirauá is high and fleshy fruits are abundant. These fruits, however, are mostly small in size and their seeds are most likely dispersed by birds, bats, fish, or water, not by primates. In this case then, primary productivity is not being largely transferred to primates as may be the case in other productive sites where preferred primate plant families are more abundant. Thus, when intertrophic interactions have a mutualistic nature such as the interaction between a fruit and a frugivore, a direct effect of primary productivity on all consumer taxa should not be expected. I suggest that in order to understand the effects of intertrophic interactions on consumer species richness in tropical rainforests it is important to first determine how the primary productivity is funnelled to the second trophic level.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
References
Ashton, P. S. (1989). Species Richness in Tropical Forests. In L.B. Holm-Nielsen, I.C. Nielsen and H. Balslev, (Eds.), Tropical Forests. Washington, D.C.: Academic Press. Pp. 239–251.
Ayres, J. M. (1986). Uacaris and Amazonian Flooded Forest., Ph.D. Thesis, Cambridge University
Ayres, J. M. (1993). As Matas de Várzea do Mamirauá. MCT — CNPq — Programa do Trópico Úmido, Sociedade Civil Mamirauá. p. 123.
Begon, M., Harper, J. L., Townsend, C. R (1990). Ecology. Second edition. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science, p. 1068.
Boubli, J.P. (1997). Ecology of Black Uakari Monkeys in Pico da Neblina National Park, Brazil. Ph..D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Boubli, J. P. (1999). Feeding ecology of black-headed uacaris (Cacajao melanocephalus melanocephalus) in Pico da Neblina National Park, Brazil. International Journal of Primatology, 20, 719–749.
Boubli, J. P. (2002). Lowland Floristic Assessment of Pico da Neblina National Park, Brazil. Plant Ecology, 160, 149–167.
Brown, J.H. 1995. Macroecology. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago. p. 269.
Comes, D. A. (1995). The effects of root competition on saplings and seedlings in Amazonian Caatinga forest in southern Venezuela, Ph. D. dissertation, University of Cambridge.
Goulding, M. (1980). The Fishes and the Forest. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Huston, M. (1994). Biological Diversity, The coexistence of Species on Changing Landscapes. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Janzen, DH (1974). Tropical blackwater rivers, animals, and mast fruiting by the Dipterocarpaceae. Biotropica, 6, 69–103.
Janzen, DH (1970). Herbivores and the number of tree species in tropical forests. American Naturalist, 104, 501–528.
Kay, R. F., Madden, R. H., Van Schaik, C. and Higdon, D. (1997). Primate Species Richness is Determined by Plant Productivity: Implications for Conservation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94, 13023–13027.
Klinge, H., Medina, E., and Herrera, R. (1977). Studies on the Ecology of Amazon Caatinga Forest in Southern Venezuela. Acta Cient. Venezolana, 28,4, 270–276.
Ludwig, J. A. and Reynolds, J.F. (1988). Statistical Ecology. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Milton, K. (1980). The Foraging Strategy of Howler Monkey: A Study in Primate Economics. New York, Columbia University Press. p. 165.
Mori, S. A., Boom, B. M., Carvalho, de, A. M., and Santos, dos, T. S. (1983). Southern Bahian Moist Forests. The Botanical Review, 49, 155–232.
Peres, C. A. (1991). Ecology of Mixed-Species Groups of Tamarins in Amazonian Terra Firme Forests. Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.
Pijl, L van der (1982). The Principles of Dispersal in Higher Plants. Third Edition, Springer, Berlin.
Pires, J. M., G. T. Prance (1985). The Vegetation Types of the Brazilian Amazon. Amazonia. G. T. Prance. Oxford: Pergamon Press, pp.109–145.
Queiroz, H. L. (1995). Preguiças e Guaribas: Os MamÍferos FolÍvoros Arbor”icolas do Mamirauá. MCT-CNPq Sociedade Civil do Mamirauá. Pp.161.
RADAM (1978). Folha NA. 19 Pico da Neblina. Ministério das Minas e Energia, Rio de Janeiro,Brazil
Roosmalen, M. G. M. (1985). Fruits of the Guianan Flora, Institute of Systematic Botany, Utrecht University, Silvicultural Department, Wageningen Agricultural University.
Roosmalen, M. G. M. (1985). Habitat preferences, diet, feeding strategy and social organization of the black spider monkey (Ateles paniscus paniscus). Acta Amazonica, 15, 1–238.
Rosenzwig, M.L. (1995). Species Diversity in Space and Time. Cambridge University Press, New York.
Steege, H. T., Sabatier, D., Castellanos, H., Andel, T. V., Duivenvoorden, J., Oliveira, A. A., Ek, R. Lilwah, R., Maas P. and Mori, S. A. (2000). An analysis of the floristic composition and diversity of Amazonian forests including those of the Guiana Shield. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 16, 801–828.
Terborgh, J. (1983). Five New World Primates. Princeton, N.J., Princeton University Press.
Terborgh, J. and Andressen, E. (1998). The composition of Amazonian forests: patterns at local and regional scales. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 14, 645–664.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Boubli, J.P. (2005). Floristics, Primary Productivity and Primate Diversity in Amazonia: Contrasting a Eutrophic Várzea Forest and an Oligotrophic Caatinga Forest in Brazil. In: Dew, J.L., Boubli, J.P. (eds) Tropical Fruits and Frugivores. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3833-X_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3833-X_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3832-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-3833-4
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)