5. Conclusion
The evidence that analogical role play provides a motivating, interesting and enjoyable way to sustain student engagement with ideas may be reason enough to include the strategy in the teaching repertoire. But analogical role play provides much more than affective gains. Role plays can be used to portray ideas and promote discussion. As the role plays evolve in response to this discussion they provide a powerful way to encourage students to think scientifically through analogical reasoning. The dialogue used and developed in the process of producing and analysing the role plays contributes to a successful learning experience. It not only helps to enhance understanding of the concepts being studied at the time but fosters learning during discussions in subsequent lessons.
It is tempting to avoid analogical role play, particularly where the students construct their own model, because the model must by its very nature be incorrect. Yet in classes such as Steve’s, the thinking and learning which occur are difficult to deny.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
5.1 References
Aubusson, P., Barr, R., Perkovic, L. & Fogwill, S. (1997). What happens when students do simulation-role-play in science. Research in Science Education, 27, 565–579.
Butler, J. (1989). Science learning and drama processes. Science Education, 73(5), 569–579.
Chester, M., & Fox, R. (1966). Role playing methods in the classroom. Chicago: Science Research Association.
Cosgrove, M. (1995). A case study of science-in-the-making as students generate an analogy for electricity. International Journal of Science Education, 17, 295–310.
Duit, R. (1991). On the role of analogies and metaphors in learning in science. Science Education, 75, 649–672.
Gardner, H. (1991). The unschooled mind: How children think and how schools should teach. New York: Basic.
Gilbert, J. K., & Boulter, C. J. (1998). Learning science through models and modelling. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 53–66). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Goodrum, D., Hackling, M., & Rennie, L. (2001). The status and quality of teaching and learning science in Australian schools. DETYA: Canberra
Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (1999). Modelling in science lessons: Are there better ways to learn with models? School Science and Mathematics, 98(8), 420–429.
Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (2000). A typology of school science models. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 1011–1026.
Heywood, D. (2002). The place of analogies in science education. Cambridge Journal of Science Education, 32(2), 233–247.
Hildebrand, G. M. (1989). Creating a gender inclusive science education. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 35, 7–16.
Hiotis, H. (1993). Using creative writing and drama to learn science. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 39 37–40.
Ladrousse, G. P. (1989). Role play. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
MacKinnon, G., & Aucoin, J. (1998). Refrigeration dynamics. Role-play helps students understand lessons beyond the level of the textbook. The Science Teacher, 65(9), 33–37.
Maksic, Z.B. (1990). Theoretical models of chemical bonding Part 1: Atomic hypothesis and the concept of molecular structure. New York: Springer Verlag.
McSharry, G., & Jones, S. (2000). Role-play in science teaching and learning. School Science Review, 82, 73–82.
Tobin, K., & Fraser, B. J. (1988). Investigations of exemplary practice in high school science and mathematics. Australian Journal of Education. 32,1, 75–94.
Treagust, D. F. (1993). The evolution of an approach for using analogies in teaching and learning science. Research in Science Education, 23, 293–301.
Treagust, D. F., Harrison, A. G., Venville, G. J., & Dagher, Z. (1996). Using an analogical teaching approach to engender conceptual change. International Journal of Science Education, 18, 213–229.
Yager, R. E., & Lutz, M. V. (1994). Integrated science: the importance of “how” versus “what”. School Science and Mathematics, 94, 338–346.
Yager, R. E. (1989). A rationale for using personal relevance as a science curriculum focus in schools. School Science and Mathematics, 89, 144–156.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Aubusson, P.J., Fogwill, S. (2006). Role Play as Analogical Modelling in Science. In: Aubusson, P.J., Harrison, A.G., Ritchie, S.M. (eds) Metaphor and Analogy in Science Education. Science & Technology Education Library, vol 30. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3830-5_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3830-5_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3829-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-3830-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)