Abstract
This chapter attempts to make sense of engaged learning. Approaches such as problem-based learning should be advocated because it is an authentic form of learning encouraging students to be self-regulated and thus metacognitive towards their own thinking and behaviors. Contrary to passive forms of instruction where learners are not perceived to be active and engaged, neither reflective, we are highlighting alternative pedagogies which promote this sense of self-regulatory actions. We describe the engaged learning framework — focusing on both problem and process — which would be necessary for authenticity in learning experiences.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
References
Bakhtin, M. M. (1984). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Barron, B.J.S., Schwartz, D.L., Vye, N.J., Moore, A., Petrosino, T., Sech, L., Bransford, J., & the Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1998). Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on problem-and project-based learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3/4), 271–313.
Barrows, H. S. (1986). A taxonomy of problem-based learning methods. Medical Education, 20, 481–486.
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2000). Process and product in Problem-Based Learning (PBL) research. In D.H. Evensen (Ed.) Problem-Based Learning: A research perspective on learning interactions (pp. 185–195). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Boud, D. (1995). Enhancing learning through self assessment. London: Kogan Page.
Boud, D. & Feletti, G. (Eds.) (1997). The challenge of problem-based learning. Stirling: Kogan Page.
Bredo, E. (1994). Reconstructing educational psychology: Situated cognition and Deweyan pragmatism. Educational Psychologist, 29(1), 23–35.
Brown, A., & Campione, J. (1996). Psychological learning theory and the design of innovative environments: On procedures, principles, and systems. In L. Shauble & R. Glaser (Eds.). Contributions of instructional innovation to understanding learning. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Brown, J., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.
Butler, D. (2002). Qualitative approaches to investigating self-regulated learning: Contributions and challenges. Educational Psychologist, 37(1), 59–63.
Dewey, J. (1964). Science as subject matter and as method. In R.D. Archambault (Ed.). John Dewey on Education: Selected writings (pp. 121–127). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Edelson, D.C. (1998). Realising authentic science learning through the adaptation of science practice (pp. 317–331). In B.J. Fraser & K. Tobin (Eds.), International Handbook of Science Education. Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Edelson, D., Gordin, D., & Pea, R. (1999). Addressing the challenges of inquiry-based learning through technology and curriculum design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(3 & 4), 391–450.
Engle, R.A., & Conant, F.R. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 399–483.
Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action: The critique of functionalist reason. Vol 2. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hmelo, C., & Evensen, D.H. (2000). Problem-Based Learning: Gaining insights on learning interactions. In D.H. Evensen (Ed.) Problem-Based Learning: A research perspective on learning interactions (pp. 4–8). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hung, D. (2002). Situated cognition and Problem based learning. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 13(4), 393–414.
Jonassen, D., Peck, K., & Wilson, B. (1999). Learning with Technology: A constructivist perspective. NJ: Merrill.
Jones, B.F., Valdez, G., Nowakowski, J. & Rasmussen, C. (1995). Plugging in: Choosing and Using Educational Technology. Washington DC: Council for Educational Development and Research.
Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Maturana, H. & Varela, F. (1987). The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. Boston: Shambhala.
Myer, D.K., & Turner, J.C. (2002). Using instructional discourse analysis to study the scaffolding of student self-regulation. Educational Psychologist, 37(1), 5–13.
National Research Council (NRC). (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Newmann, F.M., & Wehlage, G.G. (April, 1993). Five standards of authentic instruction. Educational Leadership, 50(7), 8–12.
Patrick, H., & Middleton, M.J. (2002). Turning the kaleidoscope: What we see when self-regulated learning is viewed with a qualitative lens. Educational Psychologist, 37(1), 27–39.
Paris, S.G., & Paris, A.H. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 36(2), 89–101.
Patrick, H., & Middleton, M.J. (2002). Turning the kaleidoscope: What we see when self-regulated learning is viewed with a qualitative lens. Educational Psychologist, 37(1), 27–39.
Roth, W-M. (1995). Authentic school science: Knowing and learning in open-inquiry science laboratories. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Savery, J. & Duffy, T. (1998). Problem Based Learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. In R. Fogarty (Ed.). Problem Based Learning: A collection of articles (pp. 73–92). IL: SkyLight Training and Publishing, Inc.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1991). Higher levels of agency for children in knowledge building: A challenge for the design of new media. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1, 37–68.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1999). Schools as knowledge-building organizations. In D. Keating & C. Hertzman (Eds.), Today’s children, tomorrow’s society: The developmental health and wealth of nations (pp. 274–289). New York: Guilford.
Singer, J., Marx, R.W., & Krajcik, J. (2000). Constructing extended inquiry projects: Curriculum materials for science education reform. Educational Psychologist, 35(3), 165–178.
Stepien, W., & Gallagher, S. (1998). Problem-Based Learning: As authentic as it gets. In R. Fogarty (Ed.). Problem Based Learning: A collection of articles (pp. 43–49). IL: SkyLight Training and Publishing, Inc.
Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophical investigations. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.
Zimmerman, B. (1994). Dimensions of academic self-regulation: A conceptual framework for education. In D.H. Schunk & BJ. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational implications (pp. 3–21). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hung, D., Tan, S.C., Koh, T.S. (2006). Engaged Learning: Making Learning an Authentic Experience. In: Hung, D., Khine, M.S. (eds) Engaged Learning with Emerging Technologies. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3669-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3669-8_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3668-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-3669-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)