Abstract
The range of terminology used in the field of ‘visualization’ is reviewed and, in the light of evidence that it plays a central role in the conduct of science, it is argued that it should play a correspondingly important role in science education. As all visualization is of, and produces, models, an epistemology and ontology for models as a class of entities is presented. Models can be placed in the public arena by means of a series of ‘modes and sub-modes of representation’. Visualization is central to learning, especially in the sciences, for students have to learn to navigate within and between the modes of representation. It is therefore argued that students -science students’ especially - must become metacognitive in respect of visualization, that they must show what I term ‘metavisual capability’. Without a metavisual capability, students find great difficulty in being able to undertake these demanding tasks. The development of metavisual capability is discussed in both theory and practice. Finally, some approaches to identifying students’ metavisual status are outlined and evaluated. It is concluded that much more research and development is needed in respect of visualization in science education if its importance is to be recognised and its potential realised.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. (2000). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: a critical review of the literature. Interntional Journal of Science Education, 22, 665–702.
Adey, P., Robertson, A., & Venville, G. (2002). Effects of a cognitive acceleration programme on Year 1 pupils. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(1), 1–25.
Adey, P. S., & Shayer, M. (1994). Really Raising Standards: Cognitive Acceleration and Academic Achievement. London: Routledge.
Ardac, D., & Akaygun, S. (2004). Effectiveness of multimedia instruction that emphasises molecular representations on students’ understanding of chemical change. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(4), 317–337.
Bailer-Jones, D. M. (1999). Tracing the development of models in the philosophy of science. In L. Magnani, N. J. Nersessian & P. Thagard (Eds.), Model-based reasoning in scientific discovery (pp. 23–40). New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Balaban, A. T. (1999). Visual chemistry: Three-dimensional perception of chemical structures. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8(4), 251–255.
Barnea, N. (2000). Teaching and learning about chemistry and modelling with a computer-managed modelling system. In J. K. Gilbert & C. Boulter (Eds.), Developing Models in Science Education (pp. 307–324). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Barnea, N., & Dori, Y. (1999). High-school chemistry students’ performance and gender differerences in a computerized molecular learning environment. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8(4), 257–271.
Ben-Zvi, R., Eylon, B., & Silberstein, J. (1988). Theories, principles and laws. Education in Chemistry(May), 89–92.
Bodner, G. M., & McMillen, T. L. B. (1986). Cognitive restructuring as an early stage in problem solving. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23(8), 727–737.
Buchler, J. (Ed.). (1940). The philosophy of Peirce: Selected writings. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Buckley, B., Boulter, C. J., & Gilbert, J. K. (1997). Towards a typology of models for science education. In J. Gilbert (Ed.), Exploring models and modelling in science and technology education: contributions from the MISTRE group (pp. 90–105). Reading: School of Education, The University of Reading.
Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Christopherson, J. T. (1997). The growing need for visual literacy at the university. Paper presented at the Visionquest: Journeys Towards Visual Literacy. 28th. Annual Conference of the International Visual Literacy Association, Cheyenne, Wyoming.
Ferk, V. (2003). The significance of different kinds of molecular models in teaching and learning chemistry. Unpublished Ph.D., University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana.
Fisher, R. (1998). Teaching thinking. London: Cassel.
Flavell, J. H. (1987). Speculations about the nature and development of metacognition. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation and understanding (pp. 21–29). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Francoeur, E. (1997). The forgotten tool: the design and use of molecular models. Social Studies of Science, 27, 7–40.
Gabel, D. (1999). Improving teaching and learning through chemical education research: a look to the future. Journal of Chemical Education, 76, 548–554.
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of Mind. New York: Basic Books.
Garner, R., & Alexander, P. A. (1989). Metacognition: Answered and unanswered questions. Educational Psychologist, 24(2), 143–158.
Georghiades, P. (2004). From the general to the situated: three decades of metaocognition. International Journal of Science Education, 26(3), 365–383.
Giere, R. (1988). Explaining Science. Chicao: University of Chicago Press.
Gilbert, J. K. (1993). Models and Modelling in Science Education. Hatfield: The Association for Science Education.
Gilbert, J. K., Boulter, C. J., & Elmer, R. (2000). Positioning models in science education and in design and technology education. In J. K. Gilbert & C. J. Boulter (Eds.), Developing Models in Science Education (pp. 3–18). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Gilbert, J. K., Boulter, C. J., & Rutherford, M. (2000). Explanations with Models in Science Education. In J. K. Gilbert & C. J. Boulter (Eds.), Developing Models in Science Education (pp. 193–208). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Gilbert, S. W. (1991). Model building and a definition of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(1), 73–79.
Gunstone, R. F. (1994). The importance of specific science content in the enhancement of metacognition. In P. J. Fensham, R. F. Gunstone & R. T. White (Eds.), The content of science: A constructivist approach to its teaching and learning. (pp. 131–146). London: Falmer.
Haber, R. N. (1970). How do we remember what we see? Scientific American, 222(5), 104–112.
Hearnshaw, H. (1994). Psychology and displays in GIS. In H. Hearnshaw & D. J. Unwin (Eds.), Visualization in Geographic Information Systems (pp. 193–211). Chichester: Wiley.
Hennessey, M. G. (2003). Metacognitive aspects of students’ reflective discourse: implications for intentional conceptual change teaching and learning. In G. M. Sinatra & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Intentional conceptual change (pp. 103–132). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hertzog, C., & Dixon, R. A. (1994). Metacognitive development in adulthood and old age. In J. Metcalfe & A. P. Shinamura (Eds.), Metacognition (pp. 227–251). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hesse, M. (1966). Models and Analogies in Science. London: Sheen and Ward.
Hinton, M. E., & Nakhleh, M. B. (1999). Students’ microscopic, macroscopic, and symbolic representations of chemical reactions. The Chemical Educator, 4(4), 1–29.
Hodson, D. (1992). In search of a meaningful relationship: an exploration of some issues relating to integration in science and science education. International Journal of Science Education, 14(5), 541–562.
Johnstone, A. H. (1993). The development of chemistry teaching: a changing response to a changing demand. Journal of Chemical Education, 70(9), 701–705.
Justi, R., & Gilbert, J. K. (1999b). A cause of ahistorical science teaching: the use of hybrid models. Science Education, 83(2), 163–178.
Keig, P. F., & Rubba, P. A. (1993). Translations of representations of the structure of matter and its relationship to reasoning, gender, spatial reasoning, and specific prior knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(8), 883–903.
Kluwe, R. H. (1987). Executive decisions and regulation of problem solving behavior. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 31–64). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kosma, R. (2003). The material features if multiple representations and their cogntive and social affordances for science learning. Learning and Instruction, 13, 205–226.
Kosma, R., Chin, E., Russell, J., & Marx, N. (2000). The role of representations and tools in the chemistry laboratory and their implications for chemistry, learning. The Journal of The Learning Sciences, 9(2), 105–143.
Kosma, R., & Russell, J. (1997). Multimedia and understanding: expert and novice responses to different representations of chemical phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(9), 949–968.
Kosslyn, M. S. (1994). Image and brain: The resolution of the imagery debate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kosslyn, S. M. (1987). Seeing and imagining in the cerebral hemispheres: a computational approach. Psychological Review, 94, 148–175.
Kosslyn, S. M., Pinker, S., Smith, G. E., & Shwartz, S. P. (1982). On the demystification of mental imagery. In N. Block (Ed.), Imagery (pp. 131–150). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Krajcik, J. S. (1991). Developing students’ understanding of chemical concepts. In Y. S. M. Glynn, R. H. Yanny & B. K. Britton (Eds.), The psychology of learning science: International perspectives on the psychological foundations of technology-based learning environments (pp. 117–145). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Laugksch, R. C. (2000). Scientific literacy: a conceptual overview. Science Education, 84(1), 71–94.
Luisi, P. L., & Thomas, R. M. (1990). The pictographic molecular paradigm: pictorial communication in the chemical and biological sciences. Naturwissenschaften, 77(67–74).
Martz, E., & Francoeur, E. (2004). History of biological macromolecules, from http://www.umass.edu/microbio/rasmol/history.htm
Martz, E., & Kramer, T. D. (2004). World index of molecular visualization resources, from http://molvis.sdsc.edu/visres/index.html
McGee, M. (1979). Human spatial abilities, psychometric tests and environmental, genetic, hormonal, and neurological influences. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 889–918.
Morris, S. C. (1998). The crucible of creation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1994). Why investigate metacognition? In J. Metcalfe & A. P. Shinamura (Eds.), Metacognition (pp. 1–25). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
NSF. (2001). Molecular Visualization in Science Education. Washinton, D.C.: National Science Foundation.
Pearsall, J. (Ed.). (1999). The Concise Oxford Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Peterson, M. P. (1994). Cognitive issues in cartographic visualization. In A. M. Maceachren & D. F. Taylor (Eds.), Visualization in Modern Cartography (pp. 27–43). Oxford: Pergamon.
Pribyl, J. R., & Bodner, G. M. (.1987). Spatial ability and its role in organic chemistry; A study of four organic courses. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(3), 229–240.
Reisberg, D. (1997). Cognition. New York: Norton.
Rothenberg, A. (1995). Creative cognitive processes in Kekule’s discovery of the structure of the benzene molecule. American Journal of Psychology, 108(3), 419–438.
Rouse, W. B., & Morris, N. M. (1986). On looking into the black box: prospects and limits in the search for mental models. Psychological Bulletin, 100(3), 349–363.
Shepard, R. (1988). The imagination of the scientist. In K. Egan & D. Nadaner (Eds.), Imagination and Education (pp. 153–185). Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Siegel, M. (1995). More than words: the generative power of transmediation for learning. Canadian Journal of Education, 20(4), 455–475.
Suckling, C. J., Suckling, K. E., & Suckling, C. W. (1980). Chemistry through Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tomasi, J. (1988). Models and modelling in theoretical chemistry. Journal of Molecular Structure, 179, 273–292.
Treagust, D. F., & Chittleborough, G. (2001). Chemistry:a matter of understanding representations. In Subject-Specific Instructional Methods and Activities (Vol. 8, pp. 239–267). New York: Elsevier.
Tuckey, H., & Selvaratnam. (1993). Studies involving three-dimensional visualisation skills in chemistry. Studies in Science Education, 21, 99–121.
Tufte, E. R. (2001). The visual display of quantitative information (2 nd ed.). Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
Unsworth, L. (2001). Teaching Multiliteracies Across the Curriculum. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Von Wright, J. (1992). Reflection on reflections. Learning and Instruction, 2(1), 59–68.
Winn, W. (1991). Learning from maps and diagrams. Educational Psychology Review, 3(211–247).
Wu, H. K., & Shah, P. (2004). Exploring visuospatial thinking in chemistry learning. Science Education, 88(3), 465–492.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gilbert, J.K. (2005). Visualization: A Metacognitive Skill in Science and Science Education. In: Gilbert, J.K. (eds) Visualization in Science Education. Models and Modeling in Science Education, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3613-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3613-2_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3612-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-3613-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)