Abstract
This chapter reviews bibliometric studies of the social sciences and humanities. SSCI bibliometrics will work reasonably well in economics and psychology, whose literatures share many characteristics with science, and less well in sociology, characterised by a typical social science literature. The premise of the chapter is that quantitative evaluation of research output faces severe methodological difficulties in fields whose literature differs in nature from scientific literature. Bibliometric evaluations are based on international journal literature indexed in the SSCI, but social scientists also publish books, write for national journals and for the non-scholarly press. These literatures form distinct, yet partially overlapping worlds, each serving a different purpose. For example, national journals communicate with a local scholarly community, and the non-scholarly press represents research in interaction with contexts of application. Each literature is more trans-disciplinary than its scientific counterpart, which itself poses methodological challenges. The nature and role of each of the literatures will be explored here, and the chapter will argue that by ignoring the three other literatures of social science bibliometric evaluation produces a distorted picture of social science fields.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Bourke, P., Butler, L., Biglia, B. (1996). Monitoring research in the Periphery: Australia and the ISI Indices. Research Evaluation and Policy Project, Monograph Series No. 3, Canberra: Australian National University.
Broadus, R.N. (1971). The literature of the Social Sciences: a survey of citation studies. International Social Sciences Journal, 23, 236–243.
Burnhill, P.M., Tubby-Hille M.E. (1994). On measuring the relation between social science research activity and research publication. Research Evaluation, 4 (3), 130–152.
Butler, L. (1998). Personal communication of unpublished data.
Clemens, E.S., Powell, W.W., McIlwaine, K., Okamoto, D. (1995). Careers in print: books, journals, and scholarly reputations. The American Journal of Sociology, 101 (2), 433–494.
Cronin, B., Snyder, H., Atkins, H. (1997). Comparative citation rankings of authors in monographic and journal literature: a study of Sociology. Journal of Documentation, 53 (3), 263–273.
De Solla Price, D.J. (1970). Citation measures of hard science, soft science, technology, and non-science. In C.E. Nelson, D.K. Pollak (Eds.), Communication among Scientists and Engineers (pp. 1–12). Lexington, Mass: Heat.
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge. The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
Glänzel W., Schoepflin, U. (1994). A stochastic model for the ageing analyses of scientific literature. Scientometrics, 30 (1), 49–64.
Glänzel W., Schoepflin, U. (1995). A bibliometric study on ageing and reception processes of scientific literature. Journal of Information Science, 21 (1), 37–53.
Glänzel, W. (1996). A bibliometric approach to social sciences. National research performances in six selected social science areas, 1990–1992. Scientometrics, 35 (3), 291–307.
Glänzel W., Schoepflin, U. (1999). A bibliometric study of reference literature in the sciences and social sciences. Information Processing and Management, 35, 31–44.
Glänzel W., Schubert, A., Schoepflin, U., Czerwon, H.J. (1999). An item-by-item subject classification of papers published in journals covered by the SSCI database using reference analysis. Scientometrics, 46 (3), 431–441.
Godin, B. (2002). The social sciences in Canada: what can we learn from bibliometrics? INRS, Working Paper no 1. Quebec, Canada: INRS.
Hicks, D., Potter, J. (1991). Sociology of scientific knowledge: a reflexive citation analysis or science disciplines and disciplining science. Social Studies of Science, 21, 459–501.
Hicks, D. (1999). The difficulty of achieving full coverage of international social science literature and the bibliometric consequences. Scientometrics, 44 (2), 193–215.
Hicks, D. Breitzman, A., Olivastro, D., Hamilton, K. (2001). The changing composition of innovative activity in the U.S.—a portrait based on patent analysis. Research Policy, 30, 681–703.
Ingwersen, P. (1997). The central international visibility of Danish and Scandinavian research 1988–1996. A general overview of science & technology, the humanities and social sciences by online publication analysis., 17 p. (CIS Report 5.3).
Ingwersen, P., Wormell, I. (1999). Publication behaviour and international impact: Scandinavian clinical and social medicine 1988–96. Scientometrics, 46 (3), 487–499.
Ingwersen, P. (2000). The international visibility and citation impact of Scandinavian research articles in selected social science fields: the decay of a myth. Scientometrics, 49, 39–61.
Ingwersen, P. (2002). Visibility and impact of research in psychiatry for North European countries in EU, US and world contexts. Scientometrics, 54, 131–144.
Katz, J.S. (1999). Bibliometric indicators and the social sciences. Report prepared for UK economic and social research council, www.sussex.ac.uk/Users/sylvank/pubs/ESRC.pdf
Kyvik, S. (1988). Internationality of the social sciences: the Norwegian case. International Social Science Journal, 163–172.
Lewison, G. (2001). Evaluation of books as research outputs in history of medicine. Research Evaluation, 10 (2), 89–95.
Leydesdorff, L. (2003). Can networks of journal-journal citation be used as indicators of change in the social sciences? Journal of Documentation, 59 (1), 84–104.
Line, M.B. (1979). The influence of the type of sources used on the results of citation analyses. Journal of Documentation, 35 (4), 265–284.
Luwel, M., Moed, H.F. Nederhof, A.J. De Samblanx, V. Verbrugghen, K., Van Der Wurff, L.J. (1999). Towards indicators of research performance in the social sciences and humanities. An exploratory study in the fields of Law and Linguistics at Flemish Universities. Report of the Flemish Inter-University Council (V.L.I.R.), Brussels, Belgium / Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS), Leiden University, the Netherlands / Ministry of the Flemish Community, Brussels, Belgium. V.L.I.R.: Brussels, Belgium.
Moed, H.F., Nederhof, A.J., Luwel, M. (2002). Towards performance in the humanities. Library Trends (Special Issue on current theory in library and information science). 50, 498–520.
Narin, F. (1994). Patent Bibliometrics. Scientometrics, 30 (1), 147–155.
Narin, F., Hamilton, K.S., Olivastro, D. (1997). The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science. Research Policy, 26(3), 317–330.
Nederhof, A.J. (1989). Books and chapters are not to be neglected in measuring rsearch productivity. American Psychologist, 44, 734–735.
Nederhof, A.J., Zwaan, R.A. DeBruin, R.E. Dekker, P.J. (1989). Assessing the usefulness of bibliometric indicators for the humanities and the social and behavioural sciences: a comparative study. Scientometrics, 15 (5–6), 423–435.
Nederhof, A.J., Zwaan, R.A. (1991). Quality judgments of journals as indicators of research performance in the humanities and the social and behavioral sciences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42 (5), 332–340.
Nederhof, A.J., Meijer, R.F. Moed, H.F., Van Raan, A.F.J. (1993). Research performance indicators for university departments: a study of an agricultural university. Scientometrics, 27 (2), 157–178.
Nederhof, A.J., Van Raan, A.F.J. (1993). A bibliometric analysis of six economics research groups: a comparison with peer review. Research Policy, 22, 353–368.
Nederhof, A.J., Van Wijk, E. (1997). Mapping the social and behavioral sciences world-wide: use of maps in portfolio analysis of national research efforts. Scientometrics, 40 (2), 237–276.
Nederhof, A.J., Van Wijk, E. (1999). Profiling institutes: identifying high research performance and social relevance in the social and behavioral sciences. Scientometrics, 44 (3), 487–506.
Nederhof, A.J., Luwel, M., Moed, H.F. (2001). Assessing the quality of scholarly journals in linguistics: An alternative to citation-based journal impact factors. Scientometrics 51 (1), 241–265.
Nowotny, H., Scott, P., Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-thinking Science. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Nowotny, H., Scott, P., Gibbons, M. (2003). Re-thinking science: mode 2 in societal context. http://www.nowotny.ethz.ch/pdf/Nowotny_Gibbons_Scott_Mode2.pdf.
Pestaña, A., Gómez, I., Fernández, M.T., Zulueta, M.A., Méndez A. (1995). Scientometric evaluation of R&D activities in medium—size institutions: a case study based on the Spanish Scientific Research Council (CSIC). In M. Koenig, A. Bookstein (Eds.), The Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (pp. 425–434).
Pierce, S. (1987). Characteristics of professional knowledge structures: some theoretical implications of citation studies. Library and Information Science Review (LISR), 9, 143–171.
Royle, P., Over, R. (1994). The use of bibliometric indicators to measure the research productivity of Australian Academics. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 25 (2), 77–88.
Schoepflin, U. (1990). Problems of representativity in the Social Sciences Citation Index. In P. Weingart, R. Sehringer, M. Winterhager (Eds.), Representations of science and technology, Proceedings of the International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, Bielefeld, Germany, 10–12 June, 1992 (pp. 177–188). Leiden: DSWO Press.
Small, H., Crane, D., (1979). Specialties and disciplines in science and social science: an examination of their structure using citation indexes. Scientometrics 1 (5–6), 445–61.
Thomas, P. (1998). A bibliometric analysis of fashions in management literature, PhD thesis, Nottingham Trent University.
Thorsteinsdottir, H. (1998). Islands Reaching Out, unpublished DPhil thesis, University of Sussex.
Tijssen, R.J.W., Van Leeuwen, Th.N., Verspagen, B., Slabbers, M. (1996). Wetenschaps-en Technologie-Indicatoren 1996, Het Nederlands Observatorium van Wetenschap en Technologie: Centrum voor Wetenschaps-en Technologie Studies (CWTS) en Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT) in opdracht van het Ministerie van Onderwijs, Cultuur en Wetenschappen, Zoetermeer, (ISBN 90-75023-03-0), 223p.
Van Der Meulen, B., Leydesdorff, L. (1991). Has the study of philosophy at Dutch universities changed under economic and political pressures? Science, Technology, & Human Values, 16 (3), 288–321.
Villagrá Rubio, A., (1992). Scientific production of Spanish universities in the fields of social sciences and language. Scientometrics, 24 (1), 3–19.
Webster, B.M. (1998). Polish sociology citation index as an example of usage of national citation indexes in scientometric analysis of social science. Journal of Information Science, 24 (1), 19–32.
Winclawska, B.M. (1996). Polish sociology citation index (principles for creation and the first results). Scientometrics, 35 (3), 387–391.
Winterhager, M. (1994). Bibliometrische Basisdaten zur Entwicklung der Sozialwissenschaften in Deutschland. in H. Best, et al. (Hrsg.), Informations-und Wissensverarbeitung in den Sozialwissenschaften. Opladen 1994, 539–551.
Yitzhaki, M. (1998). The language preference in sociology. Scientometrics, 41 (1–2), 243–254.
Zwaan, R.A., Nederhof, A.J., (1990). Some aspects of scholarly communication in linguistics: An empirical study. Language, 66, 523–527.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hicks, D. (2004). The Four Literatures of Social Science. In: Moed, H.F., Glänzel, W., Schmoch, U. (eds) Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2755-9_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2755-9_22
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-2702-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-2755-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawHistory (R0)