Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). 1989. Science for all Americans. Oxford University Press, New York.
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). 1993. Project 2061. Benchmarks for science literacy. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC.
American Geological Institute (AGI). 1991. Earth science content guidelines for grades K-12. American Geological Institute, Alexandria, VA.
Atkin, J.M., and P. Black. 1997. Policy perils of international comparisons: The TIMSS case. Phi Delta Kappan 79(1):22–28.
Center for Civic Education. 1994. National standards for civics and government. Calabasas, CA: Author.
Cohen, D.K., and H.C. Hill. 1998. State policy and classroom performance: mathematics reform in California. CPRE Policy Briefs. Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
Consortium of National Arts Education Associations. 1994. National standards for arts education: What every young American should know and be able to do in the arts. Reston, VA: Music Educators National Conference.
Cummins, J. 1989. Empowering minority students. California Association for Bilingual Education, Sacramento, CA.
Darling-Hammond, L., and D.L. Ball 1998. Teaching for high standards: what policymakers need to know and be able to do. CPRE Joint report Series, co-published with the National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future, JRE-04.
Delgado-Gaitan, C. 1987. Parent perceptions of school: supportive environment for children. In H. Trueba, ed. Success or failure? Learning and the language minority student. Newbury House Publishers, Cambridge, MA.
Education Week. 1998. Quality counts: the urban challenge, public education in the 50 states. In Collaboration with the Pew Charitable Trusts. 17(17), January 8, 1998.
Education Week. 1999. Quality counts’ 99: rewarding results, punishing failure. 18(17), January 11, 1999.
Garcia, E. 1991. Education of linguistically and culturally diverse students: effective instructional practices (Educational Practice Report 1). University of California, Santa Cruz, National Center for Research on Cultural Diversity and Second Language Learning, Santa Cruz, CA.
Geography Education Standards Project. 1994. Geography for life. National Geographic Research and Exploration, Washington, DC.
Hart, R.A. 1992. Children’s participation: from tokenism to citizenship. Innocenti Essays No. 4. UNICEF International Child Development Centre, Florence, Italy.
Hart, R. 1997. Children’s participation: the theory and practice of involving young citizens in community development and environmental care. UNICEF, New York.
Henderson, A.T., ed. 1989. The evidence continues to grow: parent involvement improves student achievement. National Committee for Citizens in Education, Columbia, MD.
Johnson, J., and C. Aulicino. 1998. Summing it up: a review of survey data on education and the National Education Goals. A report from Public Agenda. Paper prepared for the National Education Goals Panel, Washington, DC.
Joint Committee on National Health Education Standards. (1995). National health education standards: Achieving health literacy. Association for the Advancement of Health Education. Reston, VA.
Kim, J., L.M. Crasco, R.B. Smith, G. Johnson, A. Karantonis, and D.J. Leavitt. 2001. Academic excellence for all urban students. Their accomplishments in science and mathematics. How reform works: an evaluative study of NSF’s Urban Systemic Initiatives. Systemic Research, Inc. Norwood, MA. http://www.siurbanstudy.org/newspublication http://systemic.xohost.com/usi/Booklet.pdf
Krajcik, J.S. 1993. Learning science by doing science. In R. Yager, ed. What research says to the science teacher: science, society, and technology. National Science Teacher Association. Washington, DC. http://hi-ce.org.
Manzo, K.K. 1998. Making learning authentic: lessons from a dirty river. Education Week, October 1, 1998, 38–39.
Mathews, J. 1999. Teacher training debate extends to colleges. Washington Post, December 6, 1999.
Miles, K.H., and L. Darling-Hammond. 1998. Rethinking the reallocation of teaching resources: some lessons from high performing schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, Spring 1998, 20(1):9–29.
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). 2000. Quality of elementary and secondary school environments: teachers1 perspectives and quality of public school teachers. Available at http://www.nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/2000/section4/indicator47.html
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). 1997a. America’s teachers: profile of a profession, 1993–1994. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement. NCES 97–460.
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). 1997b. The condition of education 1997. U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC.
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). 2000. Digest of education statistics 1999. U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC.
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). 2002. The nation’s report card. 2000 science assessment results. U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC. http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard
National Center for History in the Schools. (1994a). National standards for United States history: exploring the American Experience. (Expanded ed.). Los Angeles: Author.
National Center for History in the Schools. (1994b). National standards for world history: Exploring paths to the present. (Expanded ed.). Los Angeles: Author.
National Center for History in the Schools. (1996). National standards for history. (Basic ed.). Los Angeles: Author.
National Council for the Social Studies. (1994). Expectations of excellence: Curriculum standards for social studies. Washington, DC: Author.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). 1989. Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VA.
National Education Goals Panel. 1999. The national education goals report: building a nation of learners. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
National Research Council (NRC). 1999. Global perspective for local action: using TIMSS to improve U.S. mathematics and science education. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
National Research Council (NRC). 1996. National science education standards. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
National Science Foundation (NSF). 2000a. Urban systemic program in science, mathematics, and technology education: a foundation for K-12 science and mathematics educational system reform. http://www.nsf.gov/cgi-bin/getpub?nsf0034
National Science Foundation (NSF). 1999. Annual Report for FY 1999. Education and Human Resources (EHR), Division of Educational System Reform (ESR).
National Science Foundation (NSF). 2001a. Annual Report for FY 2000. Education and Human Resources (EHR), Division of Educational System Reform (ESR). http://www.ehr.nsf.gov/gpra/anrpt/2000/ESR2000anrpt.html
National Science Foundation (NSF). 2000b. Science and Engineering Indicators 2000 Vol. I. NSB-00-1, National Science Foundation.
New York Times. 1998. Low on teachers, New York recruits in Austria. Jacques Steinberg, July 11, 1998.
O’Day, J.A., and M.S. Smith. 1993. Systemic reform and educational opportunity. Pages 250–312 in S.H. Fuhrman, ed. Designing Coherent Policy: Improving the System. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco.
Raymond, R.E. 1999. Connecting the schools and community through the education of students in geographic information systems. Cary Conference VIII, April 27–29, 2000, Millbrook, New York. http://www.ecostudies.org/cary8/raymond/raymond.html 11 August 2000.
Silver, E.A. 1995. Shuffling the deck to ensure fairness in dealing: a commentary on some issues of equity and mathematics education from the perspective of the QUASAR project. A paper presented at the Seventeenth Annual Meeting for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (North American Chapter), October 21–24, 1995. Available from the Educational Resources Information Center (document number ED 389 538).
The Urban Teacher Collaborative. 2000. The urban teacher challenge: teacher demand and supply in the great city schools. Recruiting New Teachers, Inc., Belmont, MA.
U.S. Department of Education. 2002. Budget Summary—Elementary and Secondary, FY 2002. U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC. http://www.ed.gov/offices/OUS/budget02/summary/chapter1.html
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hollweg, K.S., Pea, C.H., Berkowitz, A.R. (2003). Why Is Understanding Urban Ecosystems an Important Frontier for Education and Educators?. In: Understanding Urban Ecosystems. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-22615-X_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-22615-X_2
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-95496-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-22615-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive