Abstract
This project is investigating ‘use of knowledge’ by students who are involved in a course where knowledge is taught, in specific contexts taken from life outside and inside school, but beyond the laboratory. In order to investigate this, the research is examining how successful students are in conventional exams where real world contexts are trivialised and laboratory/school contexts dominate, and compare this with an assessment, where context varies but is not trivialised and is real world. In particular, the research is investigating, how effectively students are able to transfer their learning of physics concepts across the differing, real-life contexts found in the Supported Learning in Physics Programme (SLIPP), and, finally, onto a non-contextual situation such as an examination question. This paper focuses on the initial study, which is part of an on-going research project. It reports on students attitudes to learning physics at post-16 level, through a real-life context approach as revealed through interviews and observation. It also considers preliminary data on the effect on student learning using context rich and context poor assessments.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aikenhead, G. (1994). What is STS Science Teaching? In J. Solomon & G. Aikenhead (Eds.), STS education: International perspectives on reform (pp. 47–59). New York: Teachers College Press.
Aikenhead, G. (1994). Consequences to learning science through STS: A research perspective. In J. Solomon & G. Aikenhead (Eds.). STS education: International perspectives on reform(pp. 169–186). New York: Teachers College Press.
Hennessy, S. (1993). Situated cognition and cognitive apprenticeship: Implications for classroom learning. Studies in Science Education 22, 1–41.
Hidi S. & Berndorff D. (1998). Situational interest and learning. In L. Hoffmann, A. Krapp & K. A. Renninger (Eds.), Interest and Learning. Proceedings of the Seeon Conference on Interest and Gender (pp. 74–90). Kiel: Institute of Science Education University of Kiel (IPN).
Hildebrand, G. (1999, March). Breaking the pedagogic contract: Teachers and student voices. Paper presented at NARST Boston.
Lave, J. (1988). Cognition inpractice. Cambridge University Press.
Murphy, P., Issroff, K., Scanlon, E. with Hodgson, B. & Whitelegg, E. (1995). Group work in primary science. In A.M. Andersen, K. Schnack, & H. Sørensen (Eds.), Science-Natur/Teknik, Assessment and Learning. Copenhagen: Royal Danish School of Educational Studies.
Murphy, P. (1994). Gender differences in pupils’ reactions to practical Work. R. Levinson (Ed.), Teaching Science. London: Routledge.
Varella, G.F. (1992). Greater ability to apply concepts using an STS approach to teaching science. In R.E. Yager (Ed.), The statue of STS: Reform efforts around the world (pp. 87–92). ICASE (1992) Yearbook. KnappHill, South Harting, Petersfield, U.K
Whitelegg, E. (1996). The supported learning in physics project. Physics Education, 291–295.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Whitelegg, E., Edwards, C. (2001). Beyond the Laboratory-learning Physics Using Real-life Contexts. In: Behrendt, H., et al. Research in Science Education - Past, Present, and Future. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47639-8_48
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47639-8_48
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-6755-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-306-47639-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive