Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Albert, J. H. (1992). Bayesian estimation of normal ogive item response curves using Gibbs sampling. Journal of Educational Statistics, 17, 251–269.
Albert, J. H., & Chib, S. (1993). Bayesian analysis of binary and polychotomous response data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88, 669–679.
Anastasi, A. (1976). Psychological testing (4th edition). New York: Macmillan.
Birnbaum, A. (1968). Some latent trait models and their use in inferring an examinee’s ability. In F.M. Lord and M.R. Novick, Statistical theories of mental test scores (chapters 17–20). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Bradlow, E. T., Wainer, H., & Wang, X. (1999). A Bayesian random effects model for testlets. Psychometrika, 64, 153–168.
Du, Z. (1998). Modeling conditional item dependencies with a three-parameter logistic testlet model. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Columbia University, New York, NY.
Gelfand, A. E. & Smith, A. F. M. (1990). Sampling-based approaches to calculating marginal density. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 398–409.
Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S. & Rubin, D. B. (1995). Bayesian data analysis. London: Chapman & Hall.
Hambleton, R.K., & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item response theory: Principles and applications. Boston: Kluwer.
Hastings, W. K. (1970). Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications. Biometrika, 54, 93–108.
Lord, F. M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lord, F. M. (1983). Small N justifies the Rasch model. In D. J. Weiss (Ed.) New horizons in testing: Latent trait test theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 51–62). New York: Academic Press.
Lord, F. M., & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Mislevy, R. J., & Bock, R. D. (1983). BILOG: Item analysis and test scoring with binary logistic models [computer program]. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.
Rosenbaum, P. R. (1988). Item bundles. Psychometrika, 53(3), 349–359.
Sireci, S. G., Wainer, H., & Thissen, D. (1991). On the reliability of testlet-based tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 28, 237–247.
Stout, W. F. (1987). A nonparametric approach for assessing latent trait dimensionality. Psychometrika, 52, 589–617.
Stout, W. F., Habing, B., Douglas, J., Kim, H. R., Russos, L., & Zhang, J. (1996). Conditional covariance-based nonparametric multidimensional assessment. Applied Psychological Measurement, 20, 331–354.
Tanner, M. A. & Wong, W. H. (1987). The calculation of posterior distributions by data augmentation (with discussion). Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82, 528–550.
Thissen, D. M. & Wainer, H. (1982). Some standard errors in item response theory. Psychometrika, 47, 397–412.
Wainer, H. (1995). Precision and differential item functioning on a testlet-based test: The 1991 Law School Admissions Test as an example. Applied Measurement in Education, 8, 157–187.
Wainer, H., & Kiely, G. (1987). Item clusters and computerized adaptive testing: A case for testlets. Journal of Educational Measurement, 24, 185–202.
Wainer, H., & Mislevy, R. J. (1990). Item response theory, item calibration and proficiency estimation. In H. Wainer, D.J. Dorans, R. Flaugher, B.F. Green, R.J. Mislevy, L. Steinberg, & D. Thissen, (1990). Computerized adaptive testing: A Primer. (pp. 65–102). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associ-ates.
Wainer, H. & Thissen, D. (1996). How is reliability related to the quality of test scores? What is the effect of local dependence on reliability? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 15(1), 22–29.
Wingersky, M. S. & Lord, F. M. (1984). An investigation of methods for reducing sampling error in certain IRT procedures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 8, 347–364.
Yen, W. (1993). Scaling performance assessments: Strategies for managing local item dependence. Journal of Educational Measurement, 30, 187–213.
Zhang, J. & Stout, W. F. (1999). The theoretical DETECT index of dimensionality and its application to approximate simple structure. Psychometrika, 64, 213–250.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wainer, H., Bradlow, E.T., Du, Z. (2000). Testlet Response Theory: An Analog for the 3PL Model Useful in Testlet-Based Adaptive Testing. In: van der Linden, W.J., Glas, G.A. (eds) Computerized Adaptive Testing: Theory and Practice. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47531-6_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47531-6_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-6425-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-306-47531-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive