Abstract
There are many qualms about subjective indicators, and some believe that social policy would be better for not using them. This paper consists of a review of these objections. It is argued that policy makers need subjective indicators, the main reasons being:
-
1.
Social policy is never limited to merely material matters; it is also aimed at matters of mentality. These substantially subjective goals require subjective indicators.
-
2.
Progress in material goals can not always be measured objectively. Subjective measurement is often better.
-
3.
Inclusive measurement is problematic with objective substance. Current sum-scores make little sense. Using subjective satisfaction better indicates comprehensive quality.
-
4.
Objective indicators do little to inform policy makers about public preferences. Since the political process also does not reflect public preferences too well, policy makers need additional information from opinion polls.
-
5.
Policy maker smust distinguish between ‘wants’ and ‘needs’. Needs are not observable as such, but their gratification materialises in the length and happiness of peoples’ lives. This final output criterion requires assessment of subjective appreciation of life-as-a-whole
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrews, F. and S. Withey: 1976, Social Indicators of Wellbeing: American Perceptions of Quality of Life (Plenum Press, New York).
Boelhouwer, J. and I. Stoop: 1999, ‘Measuring wellbeing in the Netherlands’, Social Indicators Research. 48, pp. 51–75.
Campbell, A, P.E. Converse and W.L. Rodgers: 1975, The Quality of American Life (Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor).
Frank, R.: 1999, Luxury Fever. Why Money Fails to Satisfy in an Era of Excess (The Free Press, New York).
Glatzer, W. and W. Zapf: 1984, Lebensqualität in der Bundesrepublik (Quality of life in West Germany) (Campus, Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (English summary in Social Indicators Research, 1987 vol. 19, pp. 1–171).
Inglehart, R.: 1990, Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society (Princeton University Press).
Johansson, S.: 2001, ‘Conceptualizing and measuring Quality of life for national policy’, Social Indicators Research, this issue.
Kacapyr, E.: 1996, Index of Wellbeing (American Demographics).
Kanahan, D., E. Diener and N. Schwartz (eds.): 1999, Wellbeing, the Foundations of Hedonic Psychology (Russel Sage Foundation, New York).
Katona, G.: 1975, PsychologicalEconomics (Elsevier Scientific Publishers, Amsterdam, Netherlands).
Lane, R.: 2000, The Loss of Happiness in Marker Democracies (Yale University Press, USA).
Manning-Gibbs, R.A.: 1972, Relative Deprivation and Self-reported Happiness of Blacks 1946–1966. PhD dissertation University of Texas, USA.
Noll, H-H.: 1994, Zustand der offentliche Sicherkeit beintrachtegt Wohlbefinden der Bürger ISI-bulletin, nr. 12, pp. 5–8.
Schoenmakers, A.: 1998, Leefbaarheidsmonitor Zeeburg (Bureau Onderzoek Op Maat (Boom), Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam).
Schwartz, N. And F. Starck: 1999, ‘Reports of subjective wellbeing: judgemental processes and their methodological implications’, in D. Kanahan, E. Diener and N. Schwartz (eds.), Wellneing, the Foundations of Hedonic Psychology (Russel Sage Foundation, New York, pp. 61–84).
VanPraag, B.M., Th. Goedhart and A. Kapteyn: 1980, ‘The poverty line: A pilot survey in Europe’, Review of Economics and Statistics 63, pp. 461–465.
Veenhoven, R.: 1996, ‘Happy life expectancy: a comprehensive measure of quality-of-life in nations’, Social Indicators Research 39, pp. 1–58.
Veenhoven, R.: 1997, ‘Progrès dans la compréhension du bonheur’ (Advances in the understanding of happiness), Revue Québécoise de psychologie 18, pp. 29–47.
Veenhoven, R.: 1998, ‘Vergelijken van geluk in landen’ (Comparing happiness across nations) Sociale Wetenschappen 41, pp. 58–84.
Veenhoven, R.: 1999, ‘World Database of Happiness: continuous register of research on subjective enjoyment of life’, Available: http://www.eur.nl/fsw/ research/happiness
Veenhoven, R.: 2000a, ‘The four qualities of life: ordering concepts and measures of the good life’, Journal of happiness studies 1, pp. 1–39.
Veenhoven, R.: 2000b, ‘Wellbeing in the welfare state: level not higher, distribution not more equitable’, Journal of comparative policy analysis 2, pp. 91–125.
Veenhoven, R. and P. Ouweneel: 1995, ‘Livability of the welfare state, length of life and appreciation of life in nations varying in state welfare effort’, Social Indicators Research 36, pp. 1–48.
Veenhoven, R. and W. Saris: 1996, ‘Satisfaction in 10 countries’, in Saris et al. (eds.), A Comparative Study of Satisfaction with Life in Europe (Eötvös University Press, Budapest, Hungary, pp. 223–231).
Vile, M.J.: 1999, Politics in the USA (Routledge, London).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Veenhoven, R. (2002). Why Social Policy Needs Subjective Indicators. In: Hagerty, M.R., Vogel, J., Møller, V. (eds) Assessing Quality of Life and Living Conditions to Guide National Policy. Social Indicators Research Series, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47513-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47513-8_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-0727-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-306-47513-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive