This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alcock. L. and Simpson A. (1998). Definitions in university students’ perceptions of structure, Proceedings of the International Conference on Mathematics Teaching, Samos, University of the Aegean, 19–21.
Artigue, M. (1994). Didactic engineering as a framework for the conception of teaching products. In R. Bielher, R.W. Scholz, R. Strasser and B. Winkleman (Eds.), Didactics of Mathematics as a Scientific Discipline, pp. 27–39. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Borwein, J. (1999), Talk given at Technology in Mathematics Education at the Secondary and Tertiary Level conference, Brock University, Canada, June 2–3.
Carlson, D., Johnson C., Lay D. and Porter, A. (1993). The Linear Algebra Curriculum Study Group recommendations for the first course in linear algebra. College Mathematics Journal, 24.1, 41–46.
Discussion Document (1997). ICMI Study on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics at University Level. Bull. ICMI, No. 43, December, 3–13.
Dorier, J-L, Pian, J., Robert, A. and Rogalski, M. (1999). On a research program about the teaching and learning of linear algebra in first year of French science university, Pre-proceedings of this ICMI Study, 114–117.
Dubinsky E. and U. Leron (1994). Learning Abstract Algebra with ISETL. New York, Springer-Verlag.
Engelbrecht, J. (1998). What happened to undergraduate mathematics teaching over the past ten years? An international survey of undergraduate mathematics courses, conducted in conjunction with this ICMI Study. University of Pretoria, South Africa.
Jackson, A. (2000). Declining Students Numbers Worry German Mathematics Departments. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, Vol 47/3, 364–368.
Hillel, J. (2001). Departmental Profile, Concordia, Montreal, Canada, this volume pp. 179–184.
Houston, K. (2001). Assessing Undergraduate Mathematics Students, this volume, pp.407–422.
Kahn, P.E. and Hoyles. C. (1997). The Changing Undergraduate Experience: A case study of single honours mathematics in England and Wales. Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 22/3, 349–362.
Kirchgraber, U. (2001). Departmental Profile, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule (ETH), Zürich, Switzerland, the volume, pp.187–192.
NSF (March 1998): Report of the senior assessment panel of the international assessment of the U.S. mathematical sciences.
Simpson, A. (1998). The Impact of Tensions between Views of Mathematics and Students’ Worldviews. Pre-proceedings of the ICMI Study Conference, 8–12 December 1998, Singapore, 234–237.
Steen, L. A. (1992). 20 questions that Deans should ask their mathematics department. Bulletin of the American Association of Higher Education, 44:9, 3–6.
Steen, L.A. (2001). Revolution by Stealth: Redefining University Mathematics, this volume pp.303–312
Wood, L. (2001). The Secondary-Tertiary Interface, this volume, pp.87–98.
Xiang Longwan, Mathematics Education in Chinese Universities, this volume, pp.45–48.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hillel, J. (2001). Trends in Curriculum. In: Holton, D., Artigue, M., Kirchgräber, U., Hillel, J., Niss, M., Schoenfeld, A. (eds) The Teaching and Learning of Mathematics at University Level. New ICMI Study Series, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47231-7_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47231-7_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-7191-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-306-47231-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive