Collection
The role of the health research system during the COVID-19 epidemic: experiences, challenges and future vision
- Submission status
- Open
- Open for submission from
- 04 January 2020
- Submission deadline
- Ongoing
Health research systems were already under strain when COVID-19 brought significant challenges, as well as making the existing challenges in health research systems more visible and significant [1].
In this context, the global, national and local health research system is expected to be able to answer the following questions:
How to manage and control the current epidemic,
How to prevent future epidemics,
How to be more prepared in the event of the outbreak of such crises.
To control and manage the COVID-19 epidemic, and to effectively prevent and respond to future epidemics there are knowledge gaps that need to be addressed in various fields, and a wide range of research in basic sciences, clinical sciences, public health sciences, implementation science, and policy and system studies is needed to fill these gaps.
There are different systems, structures and processes for health research in different countries. In some countries the research system is fragmented, and since a wide range of interdisciplinary research is needed to control and manage the COVID-19 epidemic [2], the way these separate parts interact together is very important.
Recognising this, HARPS is dedicating a thematic issue to the role of health research systems in the control and management of COVID-19, so that the experiences of countries can be shared with each other and the lessons learned are accessible to all. Although the role of research systems in the control and management of crisis can be examined from different perspectives and by different frameworks, the following topics are particularly valuable:
o The building blocks of the health research system[3]: What was the status of each of these elements alone and in relation to each other, and what effect did the status have on the effective performance of the health research system? What interventions and innovations were made in each of the blocks to strengthen its status and what effect did it have?
These building blocks and operational components are:
Stewardship: define and articulate vision for a health research system, identify appropriate health research priorities and coordinate adherence to them, set and monitor ethical standards for health research and research partnerships, monitor and evaluate of the health research system,
Financing: Secure research funds and allocate them accountably,
Creating and sustaining resources: Build, strengthen and sustain the human and physical capacity to conduct, absorb and utilize health research),
Producing and using research: Produce scientifically valid research output, Translate and communicate research to inform health policy, strategies, practices and public opinion, Promote the use of research to develop new tools to improve health.
o The effectiveness, efficiency and equity of the health research system in facing the COVID-19 epidemic [4]:
Effectiveness: Dose it produce any outputs, outcomes or broader impact?
Efficiency: Compared to the cost spent on conducting research, how acceptable are its outputs (e.g investigating and reducing research waste)?
Equity: Fair distribution of research resources and distribution of research benefits in target groups in connection to personal needs
The Editors declare no competing interests.
References:
1. Turner T, El-Jardali F. The crucible of COVID-19: what the pandemic is teaching us about health research systems. Health Research Policy and Systems. 2020;18:52.
2. Interdisciplinary research in epidemic preparedness and response, Workshop report , UK Academy of Medical Sciences , Medical Research Council, InterAcademy Partnership for Health; October 2019.
3. Hanney S KL, Pokhrel S, Jones T, Boaz A. What is the evidence on policies, interventions and tools for establishing and/or strengthening national health research systems and their effectiveness? Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2020 (Health Evidence Network (HEN) synthesis report 69).
4. Hinrichs-Krapels.S, Jonathan.G. Exploring the effectiveness, efficiency and equity (3e’s) of research and research impact assessment. Palcomms 2016;2:16090.
Editors
-
Bahareh Yazdizadeh
Bahareh Yazdizadeh is an Associate Editor for Health Research Policy and Systems.
Articles (19 in this collection)
-
-
Lessons learnt while designing and conducting a longitudinal study from the first Italian COVID-19 pandemic wave up to 3 years
Authors (first, second and last of 10)
- Alvisa Palese
- Stefania Chiappinotto
- Carlo Tascini
- Content type: Research
- Open Access
- Published: 31 October 2023
- Article: 111
-
A framework for seroepidemiologic investigations in future pandemics: insights from an evaluation of WHO’s Unity Studies initiative
Authors
- Karen Hennessey
- Lorenzo Pezzoli
- Carsten Mantel
- Content type: Research
- Open Access
- Published: 16 May 2023
- Article: 34
-
Online Health Communities: an alternative feasible data registry tool for developing countries
Authors
- Omnia Abdelraheem
- Diana G. Sami
- Mohamed Salama
- Content type: Commentary
- Open Access
- Published: 06 April 2023
- Article: 28
-
Tracking health system performance in times of crisis using routine health data: lessons learned from a multicountry consortium
Authors (first, second and last of 36)
- Anne-Marie Turcotte-Tremblay
- Borwornsom Leerapan
- Catherine Arsenault
- Content type: Commentary
- Open Access
- Published: 31 January 2023
- Article: 14
-
Limitations of COVID-19 testing and case data for evidence-informed health policy and practice
Authors (first, second and last of 12)
- Elizabeth Alvarez
- Iwona A. Bielska
- Katrina Bouzanis
- Content type: Review
- Open Access
- Published: 25 January 2023
- Article: 11
-
Standardising policy and technology responses in the immediate aftermath of a pandemic: a comparative and conceptual framework
Authors (first, second and last of 5)
- Naomi Moy
- Marcello Antonini
- Francesco Paolucci
- Content type: Research
- Open Access
- Published: 25 January 2023
- Article: 10
-
The whole-of-society approach of mass COVID-19 vaccination in China: a qualitative study
Authors (first, second and last of 5)
- Qian Wang
- Zhiqiang Qu
- Zhiyuan Hou
- Content type: Research
- Open Access
- Published: 30 December 2022
- Article: 142
-
How can health technology assessment support our response to public health emergencies?
Authors (first, second and last of 9)
- Aparna Ananthakrishnan
- Alia Cynthia Gonzales Luz
- Hugo C. Turner
- Content type: Commentary
- Open Access
- Published: 04 November 2022
- Article: 124
-
Building capacity for integrated knowledge translation: a description of what we can learn from trainees’ experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic
Authors (first, second and last of 13)
- Priscilla Medeiros
- Celia Laur
- IKT Research Network Trainee Group
- Content type: Commentary
- Open Access
- Published: 15 September 2022
- Article: 100
-
The collaborative research and service delivery partnership between the United States healthcare system and the U.S. Military Health System during the COVID-19 pandemic
Authors (first, second and last of 5)
- Tracey Pérez Koehlmoos
- Jessica Korona-Bailey
- Eric Schneider
- Content type: Research
- Open Access
- Published: 19 July 2022
- Article: 81
-
The organization and impacts of clinical research delivery workforce redeployment during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative case study of one research-intensive acute hospital trust
Authors (first, second and last of 6)
- Rachel Faulkner-Gurstein
- David Wyatt
- Charles Wolfe
- Content type: Research
- Open Access
- Published: 18 June 2022
- Article: 68
-
Knowledge gaps and national research priorities for COVID-19 in Iran
Authors (first, second and last of 6)
- Bahareh Yazdizadeh
- Elham Ehsani-Chimeh
- Zeinab Fakoorfard
- Content type: Research
- Open Access
- Published: 02 March 2022
- Article: 25
-
Rapid research response to the COVID-19 pandemic: perspectives from a National Institute for Health Biomedical Research Centre
Authors
- Lorna R. Henderson
- Helen McShane
- Vasiliki Kiparoglou
- Content type: Commentary
- Open Access
- Published: 19 February 2022
- Article: 24
-
The qualitative experience of telehealth access and clinical encounters in Australian healthcare during COVID-19: implications for policy
Authors
- Jennifer White
- Julie Byles
- Tom Walley
- Content type: Research
- Open Access
- Published: 15 January 2022
- Article: 9
-
Challenges encountered in comparing international policy responses to COVID-19 and their effects
Authors
- Christine Riley
- Bo Xie
- Anjum Khurshid
- Content type: Research
- Open Access
- Published: 30 October 2021
- Article: 134
-
Rethinking approaches of science, technology, and innovation in healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic: the challenge of translating knowledge infrastructures to public needs
Authors
- Renan Gonçalves Leonel da Silva
- Roger Chammas
- Hillegonda Maria Dutilh Novaes
- Content type: Commentary
- Open Access
- Published: 21 July 2021
- Article: 104
-
Direct from the COVID-19 crisis: research and innovation sparks in Brazil
Authors (first, second and last of 7)
- Mário Fabrício Fleury Rosa
- Everton Nunes da Silva
- Leonor Maria Pacheco Santos
- Content type: Commentary
- Open Access
- Published: 21 January 2021
- Article: 10
-
Health research system resilience: lesson learned from the COVID-19 crisis
Authors (first, second and last of 4)
- Bahareh Yazdizadeh
- Reza Majdzadeh
- Bita Mesgarpour
- Content type: Commentary
- Open Access
- Published: 18 December 2020
- Article: 136