Abstract
This chapter looks closely at an online participatory learning environment that supported and layered experience and ideation, creating opportunities for early-career educators to articulate and contemplate evaluative norms, digital resources, and evolving practices. More specifically, flexible and contextualized approaches to learning deeply rooted in the knowledge processes (Kalantzis & Cope, 2010, 2012) empowered early-career educators to perceive themselves as agents of change, and the data provide insight into reflexive pedagogy that is sensitive to dynamic and shifting technologies, contexts, and cultures.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrams, S.S. (2012). Digital narratives by digital natives: Online inquiry and reflective practices in a third space. In R.W. Blake & B.E. Blake (Eds.), Becoming a Teacher: Using Narrative as Reflective Practice. A Cross-Disciplinary Approach (pp. 112–133). New York: Peter Lang.
Beldarrain, Y. (2006). Distance education trends: Integrating new technologies to foster student interaction and collaboration. Distance Education, 27(2), 139–153.
Cope, B. & Kalantzis, M. (2009). “Multiliteracies”: New literacies, new learning. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 4(3), 164–195.
Crystal, D. (2006). Language and the Internet (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Danin, R. & Bacon, M.A. (1999). What teachers like (and don’t like) about mandated induction program. In M. Scherer (Ed.), A Better Beginning: Supporting and Mentoring New Teachers (pp. 202–209). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Grisham, D.L. & Wolsey, T.D. (2006). Recentering the middle school classroom as a vibrant learning community: Students, literacy, and technology intersect. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 49(8), 648–660.
Ingersoll, R.M. (2012). Beginning teacher induction: What the data tell us. Kappan, 93(8), 47–51.
Kalantzis, M. & Cope, B. (2005). Learning by design. Altona, Australia: Common Ground Publishing with the Victorian Schools Innovation Commission.
Kalantzis, M. & Cope, B. (2010). The teacher as designer: Pedagogy in the new media age. e-Learning and Digital Media, 7, 200–222.
Kalantzis, M. & Cope, B. (2012). Literacies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Layder, D. (1998). Sociological Practice: Linking Theory and Research. London: Sage.
New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–92.
Olmanson, J.D., & Abrams, S.S. (2013). From partnership agreement to initial use: Multi-Sited qualitative inquiry into early implementation efforts. e-learning and Digital Media, 10(4), 357–377.
Saldaña, J. (2012). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Turner, K.T. (2010). Digitalk: A new literacy for a digital generation. Kappan, 92(1), 41–46.
Turner, K.T. (2011). Digitalk: Community, convention, and self-expression. In S.S. Abrams & J. Rowsell (Eds.), Rethinking identity and literacy education in the 21st century. National Society for the Study of Education Yearbook. 110(1).
Turner, K.H., Abrams, S.S., Katic, E., & Donavan, M.J. (2014). Demystifying digitalk: The what and why of the language teens use in digital writing. Journal of Literacy Research, 46(2), 157–193.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Sandra Schamroth Abrams
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Abrams, S.S. (2015). Digital Resources, Reflexive Pedagogy, and Empowered Learning. In: Cope, B., Kalantzis, M. (eds) A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137539724_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137539724_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-55253-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-53972-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)