Abstract
In the aftermath of the Soviet collapse in August 1991, the international constellation of major and regional powers, plus antistate organizations, has not so gradually shifted away from an essentially bicentric US-Soviet system and toward a new polycentrism that is characterized by the rise of differing (and shifting) centers of decision making with highly uneven degrees of power and influence.1 Due to the fact that there are now multiple major and regional actors as compared to the Cold War and that actions of rival states and antistate actors are often unexpected, the possibility of war appears greater today than during the bicentric Cold War.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Kautilya, The Arthashastra (New Delhi: Penguin Classics, 1992), 551–70.
Copyright information
© 2015 Hall Gardner
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gardner, H. (2015). Uneven Polycentrism and the Global Crisis. In: Crimea, Global Rivalry, and the Vengeance of History. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137528179_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137528179_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-55756-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-52817-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Intern. Relations & Development CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)