Abstract
Although you would not know it from the amount of academic attention they attract, senior civil servants do not account for the totality of civil service ‘policy makers’ (for an overview of recent comparative studies of the civil service see Horton, 2011). The terms ‘senior’ or ‘top’ and ‘policy makers’ are extremely imprecise. We do not have a ready way of defining which particular civil servants are and are not involved in making ‘policy’: all employees make decisions of some sort, but not necessarily of the kind that political scientists would consider policy decisions, whether because they are humdrum detail or the ‘implementation’ decisions of ‘street level bureaucrats’ (Lipsky, 1980). To define anyone as a policy maker as opposed to being involved in policy development raises further problems of definition. Numbers of those described as ‘top’ civil servants can range from several dozen to several hundreds even for the same country depending on how many ranks or grades one decides to include in the definition (see Halligan, 2012: 116). Moreover, while scholars make efforts to offer comparable definitions of ‘senior’ in different countries (see the essays in Page and Wright, 1999), one recent attempt to define it conceded that it was unable to offer one and settled for a ‘compromise’ (see Kuperus and Rode, 2008). So it is not possible to say with any confidence how small or large a proportion of civil servants who are involved in policy making fall into the category of ‘senior.’
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aberbach, J.D., R.D. Putnam and B.A. Rockman (1981) Bureaucrats and Politicians in Western Democracies (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
Bonnaud, L. and E. Martinais (2008) Les leçons d’AZF, chronique d’une loi sur les risques industriels (Paris: La Documentation française).
Brehm, J. and S. Gates (1997) Working, Shirking, and Sabotage (Anne Arbor, MI: Michigan University Press),
Cook, J. and S. Rinfret (2014) ‘Are They Really so Different? Climate Change Rule Development in the USA and UK,’ Journal of Public Affairs (online pre-publication version).
Dowding, K. (1995) The Civil Service (London: Routledge).
Goetz, K. (1999) ‘Senior Officials in the German Federal Administration: Institutional Change and Positional Differentiation,’ in E.C. Page and V. Wright (eds) Bureaucratic Elites in Western European States (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 147–178.
Halligan, J. (2012) ‘Leadership and the Senior Service from a Comparative Perspective,’ in B. Guy Peters and J. Pierre (eds) The Sage Handbook of Public Administration (London: Sage), pp. 63–75.
Hood, C.C. (2010) The Blame Game: Spin, Bureaucracy, and Self-Preservation in Government (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
Horton, S. (2011) ‘Contrasting Anglo- American and Continental European Civil Service Systems,’ in A. Massey (ed.) International Handbook On Civil Service Systems (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).
Howlett, M. and A.M. Wellstead (2011) ‘Policy Analysts in the Bureaucracy Revisited: The Nature of Professional Policy Work in Contemporary Government,’ Politics & Policy, 39(4), 613–633.
Huber, J.D. and C.R. Shipan (2002) Deliberate Discretion: Institutional Foundations of Bureaucratic Autonomy in Modern Democracies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Jones, A. and P. Bishop (1990) ‘Policy Making by the Lower Federal Courts and the Bureaucracy: The Genesis of a National AIDS Policy,’ Social Science Journal, 27(3), 273–288.
Kassim, H. and A. Menon (2003) ‘The Principal-agent Approach and the Study of the European Union: Promise Unfulfilled?’ Journal of European Public Policy, 10(1), 121–139.
Kaufman, H.A. (1960) T he Forest Ranger: A Study in Administrative Behavior (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press).
Kingdon, J.W. (2003) Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies (New York: Longman).
Kaufman, H.A. (1981) The Administrative Behavior of Federal Bureau Chiefs (Washington, DC: Brookings).
Krause, G.A. (2010) ‘Legislative Delegation of Authority to Bureaucratic Agencies,’ in Robert F. Durant (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of American Bureaucracy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Kuperus, H. and A. Rode (2008) Top Public Managers in Europe: Management and Working Conditions of the Senior Civil Servants in the European Union Member States (Maastricht: European Institute of Public Administration).
Lipsky, M. (1980) Street Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service (New York: Russell Sage Foundation)
Mayntz, R, F.W. Scharpf, M. Andersen, H.-U. Derlien, J. Fiedler, J. Kussau and H. Treiber (1973) Programmentwicklung in der Ministerialorganisation. Projektbericht der Projektgruppe Regierungs- und Verwaltungsreform (Bonn, mimeo).
McCubbins, M.D., R.G. Noll and B.R. Weingast (1987) ‘Administrative Procedures as Instruments of Political Control,’ Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 3, 243–277.
Meier, K.J. and D.P. Hawes (2009) ‘Ethnic Conflict in France: A Case for Representative Bureaucracy?’ American Review of Public Administration, 39(3), 269–285.
Page, E.C. (2001) Governing by Numbers: Delegated Legislation and Everyday Policy Making (Oxford: Hart Publishing).
Page, E.C. (2003) ‘The Civil Servant as Legislator: Law Making in British Administration,’ Public Administration, 81(4), 651–679.
Page, E.C. (2009) ‘Their Word is Law: Parliamentary Counsel and Creative Policy Analysis,’ Public Law, October, 790–811.
Page, E.C. (2012) Policy without Politicians: Bureaucratic Influence in Comparative Perspective (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Page, E.C. and B. Jenkins (2005) Policy Bureaucracy: Government with a Cast of Thousands (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Page, E.C. and V. Wright (eds) (1999) Bureaucratic Elites in Western European States (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Rhodes, R.A.W. (2009) ‘Frank Stacey Memorial Lecture 2008: Scenes from the Departmental Court,’ Public Policy and Administration, 24(4), 437–456.
Rhodes, R.A.W. (2011) Everyday Life in British Government (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Sheriff, P. (1976) The Sociology of Public Bureaucracies1965–75 (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage).
Stevens, A. and H. Stevens (2000) Brussels Bureaucrats? The Administration of the European Union (Basingstoke: Palgrave).
Tholen, B. and E. Mastenbroek (2013) ‘Guardians of the Law or Loyal Administrators? Toward a Refined Administrative Ethos for Legislative Drafters,’ Administrative Theory & Praxis, 35(4), 487–506.
Weingast, B.R. (1984) ‘The Congressional-Bureaucratic System: A Principal-Agent Perspective,’ Public Choice, 44(1), 147–191.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Edward C. Page
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Page, E.C. (2015). Middle-level Officials and Policy. In: van der Meer, F.M., Raadschelders, J.C.N., Toonen, T.A.J. (eds) Comparative Civil Service Systems in the 21st Century. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137491459_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137491459_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-32578-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-49145-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political Science CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)