Abstract
The present chapter focuses on the use of the term ‘populism’ in the European political scene, and more specifically in the political arena of a European country in crisis, Greece. Its aim is to show how political terms can develop new senses, or even subvert their old ones, and how these terms with the newly acquired sense can be a prime weapon in the rhetorical and ultimately political arsenal of politicians, in order to serve their intents and purposes, create a ‘Self and us’ position vis-à-vis an ‘Other’ position in a polarized antagonistic schema of common-sense ‘us’ and extremist ‘them’, discredit ‘Other’ policies and rally people around their own ‘common-sense’ beneficial policies and practices, forging political ideologies of polarization. In this process, a term signifying a political movement or programme, an ideology or a political practice becomes prey to the purposes of strategic processes of depoliticization adopted by political parties with their own political agendas. The claims are also supported by findings from applying the methodology of corpus linguistics. The scope of this chapter falls squarely within the purview of institutional powerful language use.1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albertazzi, Daniel and Duncan McDonnell (2008). Twenty-First Century Populism: the Spectre of Western European Democracy. New York and London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Anastasiadi-Simeonidi, Anna (1995). The Suffix -ismos in Modern Greek (in Greek). Studies in Greek Linguistics: 519–29. Thessaloniki: Aristotle University.
Baker, Paul (2009). The BE06 Corpus of British English and Recent Language Change. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14 (3): 312–37.
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. (1981/1930s). The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays (Michael Holquist, ed., Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist, trans.) Austin and London: University of Texas Press.
Barthes, Roland (1975). S/Z: an Essay (Richard Miller, trans.) New York: Hill and Wang.
Benét, William Rose (1972). The Reader’s Encyclopedia, 2nd edn. London: Book Club Associates.
Boyte, Harry (2012). Introduction: Reclaiming Populism as a Different Kind of Politics. The Good Society 21(2): 173–6.
Brown, Lesley (ed.) (1973/1993). Oxford English Dictionaries: the New Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Cambridge: Clarendon Press.
Canovan, Margaret (1981). Populism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Carlson, G. N. and F. J. Pelletier (eds) (1995). The Generic Book. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Emerson, John (2013). A Short History of Populism in America. Counterpunch. Available from: http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/11/05/a-short-history-of-populism-in-america/ [accessed 14 October 2014].
Fairclough, Norman (2010). Critical Discourse Analysis. Harlow, UK: Longman.
Firth, John R. (1935). The Technique of Semantics. In John R. Firth (1957), Papers in Linguistics, 1934–1951 (pp. 7–33). London: Oxford University Press.
Firth, John R. (1968). A Synopsis of Linguistic Theory 1930–55. In Frank R. Palmer (ed.), Selected Papers of J. R. Firth 1952–59 (pp. 168–205). London: Longman.
Hoffmann, Sebastian, Stefan Evert, Nicholas Smith, David Lee and Ylva Berglund Prytz (2008). Corpus Linguistics with BNC web: a Practical Guide. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Houwen, Tim (2011). The Non-European Roots of the Concept of Populism. Working Paper No. 120. Sussex European Institute: University of Sussex.
Kitis, Eliza (1997). Ads — Part of Our Lives: Linguistic Awareness of Powerful Advertising. Word and Image 13: 304–13.
Kitis, Eliza (2009a). Emotions as Discursive Constructs: the Case of the Psych-Verb ‘Fear’ http://www.enl.auth.gr/staff/EkitisFear2.pdf. In Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk and Katarzyna Dziwirek (eds), Studies in Cognitive Corpus Linguistics (pp. 147–72). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Kitis, Eliza (2009b). From Motion to Emotion to Interpersonal Function. The Case of ‘Fear’ Predicates. In Hanna Pishwa (ed.), Language and Social Cognition. Expression of the Social Mind (pp. 433–54). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kitis, Eliza (2012). Semantics: Meaning in Language. Thessaloniki: University Studio Press.
Kitis, Eliza and Michalis Milapides (1997). Read It and Believe It: How Metaphor Constructs Ideology in News Discourse; a Case Study. Journal of Pragmatics 28: 557–90.
Knight, Alan (1998). Populism and Neo-Populism in Latin America, Especially Mexico. Journal of Latin American Studies 30 (2): 223–48.
Kolaiti, Patricia and Deirdre Wilson (2014). Corpus Analysis and Lexical Pragmatics: an Overview. International Journal of Pragmatics 6: 211–39.
Kristeva, Julia (1980). Desire in Language: a Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. New York: Columbia University Press.
Laclau, Ernesto (2005a). On Populist Reason. London and New York: Verso.
Laclau, Ernesto (2005b). Populism: What’s in a Name? In Francisco Panizza (ed.), Populism and the Mirror of Democracy (pp. 32–49). London and New York: Verso.
Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English (1978/2003). 3rd edn. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.
McEnery, Tony and Andrew Hardie (2012). Corpus Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Malinowski, Bronislav (1923). The Problem of Meaning in Primitive Languages. In Charles K. Ogden and Ivor A. Richards (eds), The Meaning of Meaning: a Study of Influence of Language upon Thought and of the Science of Symbolism (pp. 296–336). New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
Mautner, Gerlinde (2009). Corpora and Critical Discourse Analysis. In Paul Baker (ed.), Contemporary Corpus Linguistics (pp. 32–46). London: Continuum.
Mouffe, Chantal (2005). The ‘End of Politics’ and the Challenge of Democratic Policies. In Francisco Panizza (ed.), Populism and the Mirror of Democracy (pp. 50–71). London and New York: Verso.
Mudde, Cas (2004). The Populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition 39 (4): 542–63.
Orpin, Deborah (2005). Corpus Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis: Examining the Ideology of Sleaze. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 10 (1): 37–61.
Panizza, Francisco (ed.) (2005). Populism and the Mirror of Democracy. London and New York: Verso.
Pappas, Takis S. (2014). Populism and Crisis Politics in Greece. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ralli, Angelliki (2005). Morphology (in Greek). Athens: Pataki.
Searle, John R. (1995). The Construction of Social Reality. London: Penguin.
Sinclair, John (ed.) (1987/1990). COBUILD, the Collins-Birmingham University International Lexical Database, English Language Dictionary. London and Glasgow: Collins.
Sinclair, John, Susan Jones and Robert Daley (1970s/2004). English Collocation Studies: the OSTI Report. In Ramesh Krishnamurthy, John Sinclair, Robert Daley and Susan Jones (eds), English Collocation Studies: the OSTI Report: Research in Corpus and Discourse. London: Continuum.
Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson (2008). A Deflationary Account of Metaphors. In Raymond W. Gibbs (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor in Language and Thought (pp. 84–105). Reprinted in Deirdre Wilson and Dan Sperber (2012). Meaning and Relevance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stavrakakis, Yannis (2004). Antinomies and Formalism: Laclau’s Theory of Populism and the Lessons from Religious Populism in Greece. Journal of Political Ideologies 9 (3): 253–67.
Stavrakakis, Yannis (2005). Religion and Populism in Contemporary Greece. In Francisco Panizza (ed.), Populism and the Mirror of Democracy (pp. 224–49). London: Verso.
Symposium: Reclaiming Populism (2012). Good Society 21(2).
Taggart, Paul (2004). Populism and Representative Politics in Contemporary Europe. Journal of Political Ideologies 9 (3): 269–88.
Vasilopoulou, Sofia, Daphne Halikiopoulou and Theofanis Exadaktylos (2014). Greece in Crisis: Austerity, Populism and the Politics of Blame. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 52 (2): 388–402.
Vološinov, Valentin N. (1929/2000). Marxism and the Philosophy of Language (Ladislav Matejka and Irvin R. Titunik, trans.). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Weyland, Kurt (2001). Clarifying a Contested Concept: Populism in the Study of Latin American Politics. Comparative Politics 34 (1): 1–22.
Wilson, Deirdre and Robyn Carston (2007). A Unitary Approach to Lexical Pragmatics: Relevance, Inference and Ad Hoc Concepts. In Noel Burton-Roberts (ed.), Pragmatics (pp. 230–59). London: Palgrave — now Palgrave Macmillan.
Wodak, Ruth and Michael Meyer (eds) (2009). Methods for Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Eliza Kitis and E. Dimitris Kitis
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kitis, E., Kitis, E.D. (2015). Meaning Ruptures and Meaningful Eruptions in the Service of Rhetoric: Populist Flare-Up Hits the Greek Political Pitch. In: Schulze, R., Pishwa, H. (eds) The Exercise of Power in Communication. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137478382_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137478382_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-50227-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-47838-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Language & Linguistics CollectionEducation (R0)