Abstract
More than fifty years on from the first publication of Doris Lessing’s The Golden Notebook, we have reached a juncture from which we can not only survey the history but also consider the future of the novel’s reception. This chapter suggests that the novel’s enduring critical importance proceeds not so much from the way in which it speaks to a particular political or social phenomenon, though that has been the subject of a great deal of illuminating scholarship, but from its metacritical commentary on the function of authorship per se and its relationship to readerly interpretation. In the final paragraph of her 1971 Preface to The Golden Notebook, Doris Lessing suggests that the novel “is alive and potent and fructifying and able to promote discussion only when its plan and shape and intention are not understood” (GN xx, emphasis in original). How do we as readers of Lessing keep faith with her resistance to codification and also perform our hermeneu-tic task? The Golden Notebook is a novel that sits in a problematic relation to generic definitions; it alternately inhabits and interrogates, underwrites and undermines, the conventions of the novel form and the expectations of a possible readership. The novel’s critical significance stems not simply from the subversion or overturning of existing forms in favor of new ones. Rather, as Nick Bentley suggests in his reading of the novel as “critical fiction,” Lessing has produced a text whose subject is the constant reformulation of literary form itself, a text that has consequently been able to remain in a productively antagonistic relationship with a succession of critical modes (Bentley).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Works Cited
Bakhtin, Mikhail Mikhailovich. Art and Answerability: Early Philosophical Essays. Ed. Michael Holquist and Vadim Liapunov. Trans. Vadim Liapunov and Kenneth Brostrom. Austin: U of Texas P, 1990. Print.
—. The Dialogic Imagination. Ed. Michael Holquist. Trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: U of Texas P, 1981. Print.
—. Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. Ed and trans. Caryl Emerson. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1984. Print.
—. Rabelais and His World. Trans. Hélène Iswolsky. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1984. Print.
Barnes, Sophia. “Stating the Problem: Doris Lessing’s The Golden Notebook and the Possibility of Representation.” Doris Lessing Studies 29.2 (2010): 20–24. Print.
Bentley, Nick. “Doris Lessing’s The Golden Notebook: An Experiment in Critical Fiction.” Doris Lessing: Border Crossings. Ed. Alice Ridout and Susan Watkins. London: Continuum, 2009. 44–60. Print.
Bernard-Donals, Michael. “Mikhail Bahktin: Between Phenomenology and Marxism.” College English 56.2 (1994): 170–88. Print.
Boehm, Beth A. “Reeducating Readers: Creating New Expectations for The Golden Notebook.” Narrative 5.1 (1997): 88–98. Print.
Booth, Wayne C. Introduction. Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. By Mikhail Mikhailovich Bakhtin. Ed. and trans. Caryl Emerson. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1984. xxii–xxvii. Print.
Burke, Sean. The Death and Return of the Author. Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP, 2010. Print.
Carey, John L. “Art and Reality in The Golden Notebook.” Contemporary Literature 14.4 (1973): 437–56. Print.
“Doris Lessing Wins Nobel Prize.” The Guardian. 11 Oct. 2007. Web. 23 Feb. 2011.
Eigler, Friederike. “Feminist Criticism and Bakhtin’s Dialogic Principle: Making the Transition from Theory to Textual Analysis.” Women in German Yearbook: Feminist Studies in German Literature and Culture 11 (1995): 189–203. Print.
Fand, Roxanne J. The Dialogic Self: Reconstructing Subjectivity in Woolf, Lessing, and Atwood. Selinsgrove, PA: Susquehanna UP, 1999. Print.
Fetterley, Judith. The Resisting Reader: A Feminist Approach to American Fiction. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1978. Print.
Gardiner, Michael. “‘A Very Understandable Horror of Dialectics’: Bakhtin and Marxist Phenomenology.” Materializing Bakhtin: The Bakhtin Circle and Social Theory. Ed. Craig Brandist and Galin Tihanov. Oxford: Palgrave, 2000. 119–41. Print.
Hite, Molly. “(En)Gendering Metafiction: Doris Lessing’s Rehearsals for The Golden Notebook.” Modern Fiction Studies 34.3 (2009): 481–500. Print.
Ingersoll, Earl G. “Dystopia/Utopia in Doris Lessing’s Canopus in Argos Novel, The Marriages Between Zones Three, Four, and Five.” Doris Lessing Studies 29.2 (2011): 9–14. Print.
Jones, Mark. “Parody and Its Containments: The Case of Wordsworth.” Representations 54 (1996): 57–79. Print.
Kaplan, Cora, and Ellen Cronan Rose, ed. Doris Lessing: The Alchemy of Survival. Athens, OH: Ohio UP, 1988. Print.
Kim, Soo. “‘But Let’s Preserve the Forms’: Doris Lessing’s The Golden Notebook (1962) as a Hegelian Modernist Novel.” Doris Lessing Studies 26.2 (2007): 14–20. Print.
Lessing, Doris. The Golden Notebook. 1962. New York: Harper Collins, 1999. Print.
—. Time Bites: Views and Reviews. New York: Harper Collins, 2004. Print.
McHale, Brian. Postmodernist Fiction. London: Routledge, 1987. Print.
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. Adventures of the Dialectic. Trans. Joseph Bien. Evanston, IL: Northwestern UP, 1973. Print.
—. The Visible and the Invisible. Ed. Claude Lefort. Trans. Alphonso Lingis. Evanston, IL: Northwestern UP, 1969. Print.
Payne, Tom. “Doris Lessing Is the Ideal Nobel Prize Winner.” Telegraph.co.uk. Web. 23 May 2011.
Rich, Motoko, and Sarah Lyall. “Doris Lessing Wins Nobel Prize in Literature.” The New York Times 11 Oct. 2007. Web. 21 May 2011.
Ridout, Alice. Contemporary Women Writers Look Back: From Irony to Nostalgia. London: Continuum, 2011. Print.
—. “‘What is the Function of the Storyteller?’: The Relationship between Why and How Lessing Writes.” Doris Lessing: Interrogating the Times. Ed. Debrah Raschke, Phyllis Sternberg Perrakis, and Sandra Singer. Columbus, OH: Ohio State UP, 2010. 77–91. Print.
Rubenstein, Roberta. The Novelistic Vision of Doris Lessing: Breaking the Forms of Consciousness. Urbana: U of Illinois P, 1979. Print.
Schweickart, Patrocinio P. “Reading a Wordless Statement: The Structure of Doris Lessing’s The Golden Notebook.” Modern Fiction Studies 31.2 (1985): 263–79. Print.
Shepherd, David. “Bakhtin and the Reader.” Bakhtin and Cultural Theory. Ed. Ken Hirschkop and David Shepherd. Manchester: Manchester UP, 2001. 136–54. Print.
Sprague, Claire. “Multipersonal and Dialogic Modes in Mrs. Dalloway and The Golden Notebook.” Woolf and Lessing: Breaking the Mold. Ed. Ruth Saxton and Jean Tobin. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1994. 3–15. Print.
—. Rereading Doris Lessing: Narrative Patterns of Doubling and Repetition. Chapel Hill: U of North Carolina P, 1987. Print.
Sturrock, John. “Jamboree.” London Review of Books. 20 Feb. 1986: 13–14. Web. 12 Sept. 2011.
Tiger, Virginia. “The Nobel Prize: The ‘Fixing’ of Doris Lessing.” Études Britanniques Contemporaines: Revue de la Société d’Études Anglaises Contemporaines 36 (2009): 93–101. Print.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Trans. C. W. Ogden. 1922. New York: Routledge, 1990. Print.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Alice Ridout, Roberta Rubenstein, and Sandra Singer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Barnes, S. (2015). “So Why Write Novels?” The Golden Notebook, Mikhail Bakhtin, and the Politics of Authorship. In: Ridout, A., Rubenstein, R., Singer, S. (eds) Doris Lessing’s The Golden Notebook After Fifty. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137477422_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137477422_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-50406-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-47742-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)