Abstract
Over 100 years since Freud attempted to bridge the gap between psychoanalysis and art history by examining the libidinal dynamics of Leonardo da Vinci’s work, the encounter between the two disciplines remains penetrated by antagonism. To all appearances, the relationship between analyst and art historian is rooted in an irreducible tension: in the other, each discipline encounters a troubling excess which calls attention to an inherent limitation in its own respective field. On one side of the encounter, the opening of the aesthetic field onto the clinical setting exposes an insurmountable gap in the art historian’s approach, an obstacle to interpretation that reduces his/her perspective to a particularized, partial reading. Although art history provides the methodological tools for a formal-historical analysis of the aesthetic object, it lacks the specific theoretical horizon that would shed light on the object’s deeper complexities. Unable to account for its theoretical presuppositions, art history remains trapped in formal analysis and is ultimately reduced to a blind ideological exercise.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
De Duve, T., 1991. Pictorial Nominalism: On Marcel Duchamp’s Passage from Painting to the Readymade. Translated by Dana Polan with author; foreword by John Rajchman. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Duchamp, M., 1979. Dialogues with Marcel Duchamp. Translated by Ron Padgett. London: Da Capo Press.
Elsner, J., 2010. Art History as Ekphrasis. Association of Art Historians, 33(1), pp. 11–27.
Green, A., 2007. French Paintings of Childhood and Adolescence, 1848–1886. Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing.
Kilroy, R., 2014. Marcel Duchamp: Resolving the Word-Image Problematic, Afterthought. Unpublished doctoral thesis.
Krauss, R. E., 1993. The Optical Unconscious. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.
—, 2011. Picasso according to Freud Paper presented at the Annual Scientific Conference, Psychoanalysis and Art: Dialogues in the Creative Process, Postgraduate Psychoanalytic Society and Institute. New York, USA, 19 March 2011.
Lacan, J. and Miller J. A., 1981. The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psycho-analysis. London: Vintage.
Locher, H., 2009. From Ekphrasis to History: Verbal Transformations of the Display of Picture Galleries—Wilhelm Heinse and Friedrich Schlegel. In: C. MacLeod, V Plesh, C. Schoel, eds. Elective Affinitie: Testing Word and Image Relationships. Philadelphia, Amsterdam, New York: Rodopi, pp. 173–85.
Panofsky, E., 1955. Meaningin the Visual Arts. New York: Garden City.
Tomkins, C., 1996. Duchamp: A Biography. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
Žižek, S., 2006. Lacan. London: Granta.
—, Objet a in Social Links. In: J. Clemens, R. Grigg, eds. Jacques Lacan and the Other Side of Psychoanalysis. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 107–28.
—, 2008a. The Sublime Object of Ideology. London: Verso.
—, 2008b. The Fragile Absolute, or, Why Is the Christian Legacy Worth Fighting for? London: Verso.
—, 2009. The Parallax View. London: MIT Press.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2016 Rebecca Ferreboeuf, Fiona Noble, Tara Plunkett
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kilroy, R. (2016). Reframing the Real: Duchamp’s Readymade as a Lacanian Object. In: Ferreboeuf, R., Noble, F., Plunkett, T. (eds) Preservation, Radicalism, and the Avant-Garde Canon. Avant-Gardes in Performance. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137474377_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137474377_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-69366-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-47437-7
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)