Abstract
Transitional justice (TJ) in Sierra Leone is commonly associated with two internationalized formal institutions — the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL) and the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC). While the SCSL was mandated to hold criminally accountable those bearing greatest responsibility for atrocities committed during the country’s brutal civil war (1999–2002), the TRC was established to foster restorative justice and reconciliation. But in addition to these specific mandates, both institutions were expected to demonstrate rule-of-law norms that would subsequently be replicated in the domestic justice system. For the Court, it was anticipated that the successful trial and conviction of perpetrators would restore confidence and trust in the judicial system, and ultimately stimulate respect for the rule of law among the local population. Although a non-judicial body, the TRC, as a state-mandated legal mechanism, was also expected to undertake a kind of positive social engineering in the post-war context. Whether there is a direct correlation between these long-term goals of justice reform and the legacy of the two concurrent TJ mechanisms remains in dispute. Particularly important is the question of why the Court became disconnected from the national justice system, despite its purported hybridity and close physical proximity to the war-torn society.
I would like to thank Kirsten Ainley, Rebekka Friedman, Chris Mahony, Rex Brynen, and Paula Brook for their valuable comments on this chapter and Vanier Canada for generous research funding.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
O. Gbla (2006) ‘Security Sector Reform under International Tutelage in Sierra Leone’, International Peacekeeping 13(1), 78–93.
J. E. Mendez (1997) ‘In Defence of Transitional Justice’, in A. J. McAdams (ed.) Transitional Justice and the Rule of Law in New Democracies (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press), p. 1.
R. Z. Sannerholm (2012) Rule of Law after War and Crisis: Ideologies, Norms, and Methods (Cambridge: Untersentia), p. 3.
J. D. Kandeh (2012) ‘Intervention and Peacebuilding in Sierra Leone’, in T. Zack-Williams (ed.) When the State Fails: Studies on Intervention in the Sierra Leone Civil War (London: Pluto Press), p. 106.
C. Reiger (2009) ‘Where to from Here for International Tribunals: Considering Legacy and Residual Issues’, ICTJ Briefing Papers (New York: International Center for Transitional Justice).
Customary justice institutions are distinguished by the following features: ‘reliance on social pressure to ensure attendance and participation, an informal process, fexible rules of evidence, basis in restorative justice, decisions based on compromise, and the central role of the disputants and community in the process.’ They are non-state justice systems, which have existed, although not without change, since pre-colonial times and are generally found in rural areas. See Panel Reform International (2001) Access to Justice in Sub-Saharan Africa: the Role of Traditional Informal Justice System (London: Astron Printers).
D. H. Isser (2011) ‘Introduction: Shifting Assumptions from Abstract Ideals to Messy Realities’, in D. H. Isser (ed.) Customary Justice and the Rule of Law in War-torn Societies (Washington, DC: United States Institute for Peace), p. 2.
D. Marshall (2014) ‘Introduction’, in D. Marshall (ed.) The Interventional Rule of Law Movement: A Crisis of Legitimacy and the Way Forward (Cambridge: Harvard University Press), p. xv.
S. E. Merry (1997) ‘Global Human Rights and Local Social Movements in a Legally Plural World’, Canadian Journal of Law and Society 30(3), 247–271.
E. Harper (2011) Customary Justice: From Program Design to Impact Evaluation (Rome: International Development Law Organization).
C. L. Sriram et al. (2011) Peacebuilding and the Rule of Law in Africa: Just Peace? (Abingdon: Routledge).
R. Cox (1986) ‘Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory’, in R. Keohane (ed.) Neorealism and Its Critics (New York: Columbia University Press), p. 128.
O. Alterman et al. (2002) ‘The Law People See: The Status of Dispute Resolution in the Provinces of Sierra Leone in 2002’, (Freetown: National Forum for Human Rights Publications).
R. L. Abel (1982) The Politics of Informal Justice (New York: Academic Press), p. 30.
J. A. D. Alie (2008) ‘Reconciliation and Traditional Justice: Tradition-based Practices of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone’, in L. Huyse and M. Salter (eds) Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Lessons from African Experience (Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance), 123–146.
L. Berg et al. (2014) ‘Beyond Deficit and Dysfunction: Three Questions toward Just Development in Fragile and Conflict-Affected Settings’, in D. Marshall (ed.) The International Rule of Law Movement: A Crisis of Legitimacy and the Way Forward (Cambridge: Harvard University Press), p. 280.
R. Shaw and L. Waldorf (eds) (2010) Localizing Transitional Justice: Interventions and Priorities after Mass Atrocities (Stanford: Stanford University Press).
T. Kelsall (2005) ‘Truth, Lies, Ritual: Preliminary Reflections on the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in Sierra Leone’, Human Rights Quarterly 27(2), 385.
See P. Richards (1996) Fighting for the Rain Forest: War, Youth, and Resources in Sierra Leone (Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann).
M. Mamdani (1996) Citizen and Subject: Contemporary Africa and the Legacy of Late Colonialism (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
V. Maru (2006) ‘Between Law and Society: Paralegals and the Provision of Justice Services in Sierra Leone and Worldwide’, The Yale Journal of International Law 31(427), 435.
See A. S. J. Park (2008) ‘Consolidating Peace: Rule of Law Institutions and Local Justice Practices in Sierra Leone’, South African Journal on Human Rights 24(3), 536–564.
L. Denney (2013) ‘Liberal Chiefs or Illiberal Development? The Challenge of Engaging Chiefs in DFID’s Security Sector Reform Programme in Sierra Leone’, Development Policy Review 31(1), 6.
According to Braithwaite-Wallis, ‘kassi’ is levied as a penalty when a person is found guilty of any breach of local custom in court or elsewhere in Mendiland: C. Braithwaite-Wallis (1905) ‘In the Court of the Native Chiefs in Mendiland’, Journal of the Royal African Society 4(16), 397–409.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Mohamed Sesay
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sesay, M. (2015). Harmonizing Customary Justice with the International Rule of Law? Lessons from Post-Conflict Sierra Leone. In: Ainley, K., Friedman, R., Mahony, C. (eds) Evaluating Transitional Justice. Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137468222_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137468222_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-69147-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-46822-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Intern. Relations & Development CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)