Skip to main content

Credit Scoring using Multiobjective Data Mining

  • Chapter
Enterprise Risk Management in Finance

Abstract

The technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) is a classical method first developed by Hwang and Yoon,1 subsequently discussed by many.2 TOPSIS is based on the concept that alternatives should be selected that have the shortest distance from the positive ideal solution (PIS) and the longest distance from the negative ideal solution (NIS), or nadir. The PIS has the best measures over all attributes, while the NIS has the worst measures over all attributes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. C.L. Hwang, K. Yoon (1981) Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Springer-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Y. Peng (2000) Management Decision Analysis. Science Publication;

    Google Scholar 

  3. T.-C. Chu (2002) ‘Facility location selection using fuzzy TOPSIS under group decisions,’ International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness & Knowledge-Based Systems, 10 (6): 687–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. D.L. Olson (2005) ‘Comparison of weights in TOPSIS models,’ Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 40: 721–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Freimer, P.L. Yu (1976) ‘Some new results on compromise solutions for group decision problems,’ Management Science, 22 (6): 688–693;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. T.E. Dielman (2005) ‘Least absolute value regression: recent contributions,’ Journal of Statistical Computation & Simulation, 75 (4): 263–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. S.C. Caples, M.E. Hanna (1997) ‘Least squares versus least absolute value in real estate appraisals,’ Appraisal Journal, 65 (1): 18–24.

    Google Scholar 

  8. G.W. Bassett, Jr. (1997) ‘Robust sports rating based on least absolute errors,’ American Statistician, 51 (2): 99–105.

    Google Scholar 

  9. S.M. Lee, D.L. Olson (2004) ‘Goal programming formulations for a comparative analysis of scalar norms and ordinal vs. ratio data,’ Information Systems and Operational Research, 42 (3): 163–174.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. Barnes (1987) ‘The analysis and use of financial ratios: a review article’, Journal of Business and Finance Accounting, 14: 449–461;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. H. Deng, C.-H. Yeh, R.J. Willis (2000) ‘Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weight’, Computers & Operations Research, 27: 963–973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. D.L. Olson (2004) ‘Data set balancing’, Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Data Mining and Knowledge Management, Y. Shi, W. Xu, Z. Chen, eds. Springer, 71–80.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Laurikkala (2002) ‘Instance-based data reduction for improved identification of difficult small classes’, Intelligent Data Analysis, 6 (4): 311–322.

    Google Scholar 

  14. B. Bull (2005) ‘Exemplar sampling: Nonrandom methods of selecting a sample which characterizes a finite multivariate population,’ American Statistician, 59 (2): 166–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. D.L. Olson, D. Wu (2006) ‘Simulation of fuzzy multiattribute models for grey relationships,’ European Journal of Operational Research, 175 (1): 111–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2015 Desheng Dash Wu and David L. Olson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wu, D.D., Olson, D.L. (2015). Credit Scoring using Multiobjective Data Mining. In: Enterprise Risk Management in Finance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137466297_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics