Skip to main content

DEA Risk Scoring Model of Internet Stocks

  • Chapter
Enterprise Risk Management in Finance

Abstract

In financial markets, there are many kinds of investments, with stock the most popular. When investors choose which stock to invest in, they may expect high returns from investing in high performance companies. However, the greatest concern for investors is whether their investment has the potential for high returns, and whether the high performance companies will always yield high returns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. S.A. Ross, R.M. Westerfield, B.D. Jordan (2007) Corporate Finance Essentials. McGrawHill/Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  2. G.J. Fielding, T.T. Babitsky, M.E. Brenner (1985) ‘Performance evaluation for bus transit,’ Transportation Research, 19A (1): 73–82;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. L.V. Utikin (2007) ‘Risk analysis under partial prior infermation and nonmonotone utility functions,’ International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making, 6: 625–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. C.-T. Ho and D.S. Zhu (2004) ‘Performance measurement of Taiwan’s commercial banks,’ International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 53 (5): 425–434;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. D. Wu (2009) ‘Performance evaluation: an integrated method using data envelopment analysis and fuzzy preference relations,’ European Journal of Operational Research, 194 (1): 227–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. K. Cengiz, C. Ufuk and U. Ziya (2003) ‘Multi-criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP,’ Logistics Information Management, 16 (6): 382–394;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. T.L. Saaty (2008) ‘Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process,’ International Journal of Services Sciences, 1 (1): 83–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. T. S. Felix and H.J. Chan (2003) ‘An innovative performance measurement method for supply chain management,’ Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 8 (3): 209–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. C.-T. Ho (2006) ‘Measuring bank operations performance: an approach based on grey relation analysis,’ Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57, 227–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. R.S. Kaplan and D.P. Norton (2006) Alignment: Using the Balanced Scorecard to Create Corporate Synergies. Harvard Business School Press Books.

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. Espahbodi (1991) ‘Identification of problem banks and binary choice models,’ Journal of Banking and Finance, 15, 53–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. D. Wu (2006) ‘A note on DEA efficiency assessment using ideal point: an improvement of Wang and Luo’s model,’ Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2: 819–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. M.J. Farrell (1957) ‘The measurement of productive efficiency,’ Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 120, 253–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. W. Charnes, A. Cooper, E. Rhodes (1978) ‘Measuring the efficiency of decision making units,’ European Journal of Operational Research, 2: 429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. R.D. Banker, A. Charnes, W. Cooper (1984) ‘Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis,’ Management Science, 30, 1078–1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. P.S. Sudarsanam and R.J. Taffler (1995) ‘Financial ratio proportionality and inter-temporal stability: an empirical analysis,’ Journal of Banking & Finance, 19 (1): 45–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. C.-T. Ho, D.S. Zhu (2004) ‘Performance measurement of Taiwan’s commercial banks,’ International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 53 (5): 425–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. S.N. Huang, T.L. Kao (2006) ‘Measuring managerial efficiency in non-life insurance companies: an application of two-stage data envelopment analysis,’ International Journal of Management, 23 (3): 699–720.

    Google Scholar 

  19. L.M. Seiford, J. Zhu (1999) ‘Profitability and marketability of the top 55 U.S. commercial banks,’ Management Science, 45 (9): 1270–1288;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. X. Luo (2003) ‘Evaluating the profitability and marketability efficiency of large banks: an application of data envelopment analysis,’ Journal of Business Research, 56: 627–635;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. A. Barua, P.L. Brockett, W.W. Cooper, H. Deng, B.R. Parker, T.W. Ruefli, A. Whinston (2004) ‘Multi-factor performance measure model with an application to fortune 500 companies,’ Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 38: 233–253;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. C. S. Carlos, F.C. Yolanda, M.M. Cecilio (2005) ‘Measuring DEA efficiency in internet companies,’ Decision Support Systems, 38: 557–573;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. D. Wu, Z. Yang, L. Liang (2006) ‘Using DEA-neural network approach to evaluate branch efficiency of a large Canadian bank,’ Expert Systems with Applications, 31 (1): 108–115;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. S.F. Lo, W.M. Lu (2006) ‘Does size matter? finding the profitability and marketability benchmark of financial holding companies,’ Journal of Operational Research, 23 (2): 229–246;

    Google Scholar 

  25. H.C. Tsai, C.M. Chen, G.H. Tzeng (2006) ‘The comparative productivity efficiency for global telecoms,’ International Journal of Production Economics, 103: 509–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. D. Wu (2006) ‘A note on DEA efficiency assessment using ideal point: an improvement of Wang and Luo’s model,’ Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2: 819–830;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. N. Ahmad, D. Berg, G.R. Simons (2006) ‘The integration of analytic hierarchy process and data envelopment analysis in a multi-criteria decision-making problem,’ International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making, 5: 263–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. J. Yao, Z. Li, K.W. Ng (2006) ‘Model risk in VaR estimation: an empirical study,’ International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making, 5: 503–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Y. Shi, Y. Peng, G. Kou, Z. Chen (2006) ‘Classifying credit card accounts for business intelligence and decision making: a multiple-criteria quadratic programming approach,’ International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making, 4: 1–19;

    Google Scholar 

  30. S. Deng, Z. Xia (2006) ‘A real options approach for pricing electricity tolling agreements,’ International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making, 5, 421–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2015 Desheng Dash Wu and David L. Olson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wu, D.D., Olson, D.L. (2015). DEA Risk Scoring Model of Internet Stocks. In: Enterprise Risk Management in Finance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137466297_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics