Skip to main content

Blake, Wesley and Theology

  • Chapter
Blake and the Methodists
  • 79 Accesses

Abstract

Between 1738 and 1739 Wesleyan Methodism had forged its own ideology and religious practice.1 Wesley had set out to evangelise across Britain and preached a religion of the heart and the doctrine of justification by faith alone. In his Journal (13 September 1739) he described his position to ‘A serious clergyman’ who desired to know in what points Methodism differed from the Anglican Church, stating, ‘To the best of my knowledge, in none. The doctrines we preach are the fundamental doctrines of the Church, clearly laid down, in her Prayers, Articles, and Homilies.’2 G. F. Nuttall suggests that there were two types of Arminianism at this time: ‘Arminianism of the heart’ and ‘Arminianism of the head’. The former helps us to locate Wesley’s High Church theology more precisely: what he held in common with both rational dissent and the High Church party in the Church of England was Arminianism (the Calvinist Evangelicals, both within the Anglican Church and outside it were, of course, not Arminians); but the rational dissenters and the High Church Anglicans were deistical and inclined to natural religion. Wesley, however, was an Arminian of the heart and emphasised feeling and faith over reason.3

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See Frederick Dreyer, ‘A “Religious Society Under Heaven”: John Wesley and the Identity of Methodism’, The Journal of British Studies, 25: 1 (January 1986), 62–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. See Geoffrey Nuttall, The Puritan Spirit (London, 1967), 67ff.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See J. Henry Martin, John Wesley’s Chapels (London, 1946).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rivers suggests three stages of development in Wesley’s thought: firstly, an interest in mysticism during the Holy Club period; secondly, his involvement with the Moravians and adoption of the solafidian doctrine of justification by faith alone; lastly the establishment of a distinct Methodist system from the 1740s onwards. See Rivers, Reason, Grace, and Sentiment: A Study of the Language of Religion and Ethics in England, 1660–1780 Volume I: Whichcote to Wesley (Cambridge, 2005), 208–10.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See Richard E. Brantley, Locke, Wesley, and the Method of English Romanticism (Gainesville, 1983), 130.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Worden, ‘The Emotional Evangelical’, 2. See also Frederick C. Gill, The Romantic Movement and Methodism: A Study of English Romanticism and the Evangelical Revival (London, 1954), 149.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See Michael Ferber, The Social Vision of William Blake (Princeton, 1985), 77.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See Davies, The Theology of William Blake (Oxford, 1948), 116–22. My parenthesis.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Crabb Robinson, Henry, Blake, Coleridge, Wordsworth, Lamb Etc. Being Selections from the Remains of Henry Crabb Robinson, Morley, Edith J., ed., (Manchester, 1922).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Robert Ryan, The Romantic Reformation: Religious Politics in English Literature 1789–1824 (Cambridge, 1997), 49.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wesley, from a sermon preached at Bristol in 1740, quoted in Stuart Andrews, Methodism and Society (London, 1970), 61.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Leslie Tannenbaum, Biblical Tradition in Blake’s Early Prophecies (Princeton, 1982), 279.

    Google Scholar 

  13. For an account of Methodism and antinomianism see Bernard Semmel, The Methodist Revolution (London, 1974), 23–81.

    Google Scholar 

  14. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (London, 2004), 616, 617. There are echoes between Locke’s ‘dim candle of reason’ and Blake’s use of the phrase ‘a candle in sunshine.’ See The Marriage of Heaven and Hell, E, 43. David Erdman, The Complete Poetry and Prose of William Blake (New York, 1988) and

    Google Scholar 

  15. John Locke, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (London, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  16. John Telford, ed., Wesley’s Veterans: Lives of Early Methodist Preachers Told by Themselves (London, 1912), 74–75.

    Google Scholar 

  17. See D. Bruce Hindmarsh, ‘“My chains fell off, my heart was free”: Early Methodist Conversion Narrative in England’, Church History, 68: 4 (December 1999), 910–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Robert Southey, The Life of Wesley and Rise and Progress of Methodism, Vol. 2 (London, 1864), 78–79.

    Google Scholar 

  19. The epithet ‘Lamb’ to describe Christ, for example, was typically used in Methodist hymnody. See E, 8–9. See also Thomas B. Shepherd, Methodism and the Literature of the Eighteenth Century (London, 1940), 245–46.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2014 Michael Farrell

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Farrell, M. (2014). Blake, Wesley and Theology. In: Blake and the Methodists. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137455505_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics