Abstract
Model misspecification is put forward as a possible explanation for the Meese-Rogoff puzzle, in the sense that models fail to outperform the random walk because they are misspecified. However, three variations of exchange rate determination models (the post-Keynesian flow model, a version of the F-B model that distinguishes between traded and non-traded goods, and the F-B, D-F and H-M models without the proportionality and symmetry restrictions) cannot outperform the random walk in terms of the magnitude of the forecasting error. In contrast, when the forecasts of the three models are assessed by alternative measures of forecasting accuracy, a different conclusion is reached. The random walk can be outperformed by alternative model specifications only if forecasting accuracy is assessed by measures that do not rely exclusively on the magnitude of error.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Imad A. Moosa and Kelly Burns
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Moosa, I.A., Burns, K. (2015). Model Misspecification. In: Demystifying the Meese-Rogoff Puzzle. Palgrave Pivot, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137452481_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137452481_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-49743-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-45248-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)