Skip to main content

Prehistory and Palaeontology in France, 1900–40

  • Chapter
France in an Era of Global War, 1914–1945
  • 155 Accesses

Abstract

In many fields of scientific and intellectual activity, French scholars and institutions had built up a leading, even dominant, position over the course of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. In disciplines such as medicine, anthropology, mathematics and physics, French scientists were often at the forefront of developments and in key positions within international networks.1 However, in the late nineteenth century, and particularly across the twentieth, this ascendant position often seemed to unravel, particularly under competition from larger and better-funded institutions in other countries — first through the prominence of German science, but then the even greater rise of well-funded institutions in the United States. This was exacerbated by shocks to French society and its global position following the world wars, and the general decline of French as the international language of scholarship and intellectual endeavour in favour of English. In this narrative, the interwar period occupies a potentially uneasy position, with French predominance retained in many areas, but with a growing sense that its position was threatened.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The specialist literature here is vast, but see particularly R. Fox (2012) The Savant and the State: Science and Cultural Politics in Nineteenth-Century France (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press);

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Crosland (1995) Studies in the Culture of Science in France and Britain since the Enlightenment (Brookfield, VT: Variorum);

    Google Scholar 

  3. H. Paul (1985) From Knowledge to Power: The Rise of the Science Empire in France, 1860–1939 (Cambridge University Press);

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. and J. Hecht (2003) The End of the Soul: Scientific Modernity, Atheism, and Anthropology in France (New York: Columbia University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  5. For more general examinations of this, see R. Overy (2010) The Inter-War Crisis, 1919–1939 (Harlow and New York: Longman);

    Google Scholar 

  6. Z. Steiner (2005) The Lights That Failed: European International History, 1919–1933 (Oxford University Press); and (2011) The Triumph of the Dark: European International History 1933–1939 (Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. This point is particularly strongly made in C. Cohen (2012) La méthode de Zadig: la trace, le fossile, la preuve (Paris: Seuil).

    Google Scholar 

  8. For a general study of the development of the concept of ‘deep time’ across Europe in the early nineteenth century, with an international, but largely Franco-British-German framework, see M. Rudwick (2005) Bursting the Limits of Time: The Reconstruction of Geohistory in the Age of Revolution (University of Chicago Press), and (2008) Worlds before Adam: The Reconstruction of Geohistory in the Age of Reform (University of Chicago Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. For palaeontology, see C. Cohen (1994) Le destin du mammouth (Paris: Seuil);

    Google Scholar 

  10. C. Grimoult (2000) Le dé veloppement de la palé ontologie contemporaine (Genève: Droz);

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. and E. Buffetaut (1987) A Short History of Vertebrate Palaeontology (London: Croom Helm).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Human prehistory has been studied in A. Hurel (2007) La France préhistorienne de 1789 à 1941 (Paris: CNRS)

    Google Scholar 

  13. and N. Coye (1998) La pré histoire en parole et en acte: Mé thodes et enjeux de la pratique archéologique, 1830–1950 (Paris: L’Harmattan).

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. Bowdoin Van Riper (1993) Men among the Mammoths: Victorian Science and the Discovery of Human Prehistory (University of Chicago Press)

    Google Scholar 

  15. and A. O’Connor (2007) Finding Time for the Old Stone Age: A History of Palaeolithic Archaeology and Quaternary Geology in Britain, 1860–1960 (Oxford University Press) give Britain-centred accounts, but acknowledge the importance of French scholarship.

    Google Scholar 

  16. See G. Laurent (1987) Paléontologie et évolution en France de 1800 à 1860: une histoire des idées de Cuvier et Lamarck à Darwin (Paris: CTHS) and Rudwick, Bursting the Limits, 349–416.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Discussed in P. Corsi (1988) The Age of Lamarck: Evolutionary Theories in France, 1790–1830 (Berkeley: University of California Press);

    Google Scholar 

  18. T. Appel (1987) The Cuvier–Geoffroy Debate: French Biology in the Decades before Darwin (Oxford University Press) and Laurent, Paléontologie et évolution.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Indeed, French evolutionary ideas serve as one of the key case studies in P. Bowler (1983) The Eclipse of Darwinism: Anti-Darwinian Evolution Theories in the Decades around 1900 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press) 107–17.

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. Schnapp (1996) ‘French Archaeology: Between National Identity and Cultural Identity’, in Margarita Díaz-Andreu and Timothy Champion (eds) Nationalism and Archaeology in Europe (Boulder, CO: Westview Press) 48–67.

    Google Scholar 

  21. S. Teller Ratner (2002) Camille Saint-Saëns 1835–1921: A Thematic Catalogue of His Complete Works I (Oxford University Press) 192.

    Google Scholar 

  22. The popularising works and novels included L. Figuier (1863) La terre avant le dé luge (Paris) and (1870) L’homme primitif (Paris),

    Google Scholar 

  23. J. H. Rosny (1892) Vamireh: roman des temps primitifs (Paris)

    Google Scholar 

  24. and J. Verne (1867) Voyage au centre de la terre (Paris).

    Google Scholar 

  25. The genre of prehistoric fiction is discussed in N. Ruddick (2009) The Fire in the Stone: Prehistoric Fiction from Charles Darwin to Jean M. Auel (Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  26. M. Hammond (1980) ‘Anthropology as a Weapon of Social Combat in Late-Nineteenth-Century France’, Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 1:2, 118–32,

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. and Nathalie Richard (2012) ‘Archeology, Biology, Anthropology: Human Evolution according to Gabriel de Mortillet and John Lubbock’, History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 34:1–2, 9–31.

    Google Scholar 

  28. G. de Mortillet (1867) ‘Promenades Préhistoriques à l’Exposition Universelle’, Matériaux pour l’histoire positive et philosophique de l’homme, 3, 368.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gaudry’s thought and career are discussed in J. Gaudant (1991) ‘Albert Gaudry (1827–1908) et Les “Enchaînements Du Monde Animal”’, Revue d’histoire des sciences, 44:1, 117–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Boule has been relatively understudied in the secondary literature. but see M. Hammond (1982) ‘The Expulsion of the Neanderthals from Human Ancestry: Marcellin Boule and the Social Context of Scientific Research’, Social Studies of Science, 12:1, 1–36,

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. and M. Sommer (2006) ‘Mirror, Mirror on the Wall: Neanderthal as Image and “Distortion” in Early 20th-Century French Science and Press’, Social Studies of Science, 36:2, 207–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. This has been discussed in Fanny Defrance-Jublot (2005) ‘Question laïque et légitimité scientifique en préhistoire, la revue “L’Anthropologie” (1890–1910)’, Vingtième Siècle, 87, 73–84,

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. and A. Hurel (2011) L’abbé Breuil: un préhistorien dans le siècle (Paris: CNRS).

    Google Scholar 

  34. I. Nieuwland (2010) ‘The Colossal Stranger: Andrew Carnegie and Diplodocus Intrude European Culture, 1904–1912’, Endeavour, 34:2, 61–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. M. Boule (1916) ‘La Guerre et la Paléontologie’, in Gabriel Petit and Maurice Leudet (eds), Les Allemands et La Science (Paris: Alcan) 33–46. This has also been discussed in Buffetaut, Vertebrate Palaeontology.

    Google Scholar 

  36. M. Boule (1922) ‘L’oeuvre anthropologique du Prince Albert Ier de Monaco et les récents progrès de la paléontologie humaine en France’, The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 52, 163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. See for example S. Tomášková (2003) ‘Nationalism, Local Histories and the Making of Data in Archaeology’, The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 9:3, 485–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. G. Maier (2003) African Dinosaurs Unearthed: The Tendaguru Expeditions (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  39. International Congress of Prehistoric and Protohistoric Sciences (1930) Proceedings of the First International Congress of Prehistoric and Protohistoric Sciences: London, August 1–6, 1932 (London), frontispiece.

    Google Scholar 

  40. The massive expansion of palaeontology in the United States has been studied in P. Brinkman (2010) The Second Jurassic Dinosaur Rush: Museums and Palaeontology in America at the Turn of the Twentieth Century (University of Chicago Press);

    Book  Google Scholar 

  41. R. Rainger (1991) An Agenda for Antiquity: Henry Fairfield Osborn and Vertebrate Palaeontology at the American Museum of Natural History, 1890–1935 (Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press);

    Google Scholar 

  42. and L. Rieppel (2012) ‘Bringing Dinosaurs Back to Life: Exhibiting Prehistory at the American Museum of Natural History’, Isis, 103:3, 460–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. R. White (2002) ‘The Historic and Legal Context of Foreign Acquisitions of PalaeoPalaeolithic Artifacts from the Périgord: 1900 to 1941’, in Lawrence G. Straus (ed.) The Role of American Archeologists in the Study of the European Upper PalaeoPalaeolithic (Oxford: Archaeopress) 71–83.

    Google Scholar 

  44. H. Fairfield Osborn (1915) Men of the Old Stone Age: Their Environment, Life and Art (New York).

    Google Scholar 

  45. See L. Pyenson (1993) Civilizing Mission: Exact Sciences and French Overseas Expansion, 1830–1940 (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  46. and P. Petitjean (2005) ‘Science and the “Civilizing Mission”: France and the Colonial Enterprise’, in Benedikt Stuchtey (ed.) Science across the European Empires, 1800–1950 (Oxford University Press) 107–28.

    Google Scholar 

  47. M. Boule and H. Vallois (1932) L’Homme Fossile d’Asselar, Sahara (Paris).

    Google Scholar 

  48. M. Boule and A. Thevenin (1920) Mammifères fossiles de Tarija (Paris).

    Google Scholar 

  49. C. Cuénot (1966) ‘Le Ré vé rend Pè re Emile Licent S. J.’, Bulletin de la Société des Etudes Indochinoises, 61:1, 9–83, gives a biographical outline of Licent.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Letters from the expeditions by Teilhard de Chardin have also been published in A. Vialet and A. Hurel (2004) Teilhard de Chardin en Chine: correspondance inédite, 1923–1940 (Paris: Edisud).

    Google Scholar 

  51. The Central Asiatic Expeditions have been discussed in P. Kjærgaard (2012) ‘The Missing Links Expeditions — or How the Peking Man Was Not Found’, Endeavour 36:3, 97–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. M. Boule et al. (1928) Le palé olithique de la Chine (Paris).

    Google Scholar 

  53. C. Depéret (1917) Monographie de la faune de mammifères fossiles du Ludien inférieur d’Euzet-les-Bains (Gard) (Lyon).

    Google Scholar 

  54. See Hurel, L’abbé Breuil and A. Houghton Brodrick (1963) Father of Prehistory: The Abbé Henri Breuil: His Life and Times (New York: Morrow).

    Google Scholar 

  55. A. Lawson (2012) Painted Caves: Palaeolithic Rock Art in Western Europe (Oxford University Press) 49–106 and Hurel, L’abbé Breuil, 85–130.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  56. É. Cartailhac and H. Breuil (1906) Peintures et gravures murales des cavernes palé olithiques: La Caverne d’Altamira à Santillane près Santander (Monaco)

    Google Scholar 

  57. and L. Capitan and H. Breuil (1910) La caverne de Font-de-Gaume aux Eyzies (Dordogne) (Monaco).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Chris Manias

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Manias, C. (2014). Prehistory and Palaeontology in France, 1900–40. In: Broch, L., Carrol, A. (eds) France in an Era of Global War, 1914–1945. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137443502_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137443502_10

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-49536-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-44350-2

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics