Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Community Engagement in Higher Education ((CEHE))

Abstract

A fair amount of evidence indicates that service-learning qualifies as a high-impact activity when delivered effectively. This chapter considers four key challenges that need to be addressed to replicate the experiences and achieve the educational purposes of a traditionally delivered service-learning course. They are whether technology can be used to (1) tailor assignments to accommodate students’ cognitive and intellectual developmental levels; (2) provide timely, constructive, personalized feedback; (3) ensure hundreds or more students effectively integrate and transfer what they are gaining from their service-learning experience; and (4) enable faculty to become confident and competent in using engaging pedagogies that make service-learning develop-mentally powerful. In all likelihood, the technology-enriched service-learning offerings yielding the high-impact outcomes associated with the traditional model will take hybrid forms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Finley, A., & McNair, T. (2013). Assessing underserved students’ engagement in high-impact practices Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G.D. (2008). High impact educational practices: what they are, who has access to them, and why they matter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G.D., & O’Donnell, K. (2013). Ensuring quality and taking high-impact practices to scale. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, W. G., Jr. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: a scheme. Troy, MO: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, W.G., Jr. (1981). Cognitive and ethical growth: the making of meaning. In A.W. Chickering (Ed.), The modern American college (pp. 76–116). New York: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 George D. Kuh

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kuh, G.D. (2014). Insuring That Technology-Enriched Service-Learning Lives Up to the Promise of a High-Impact Activity. In: Crabill, S.L., Butin, D. (eds) Community Engagement 2.0?: Dialogues on the Future of the Civic in the Disrupted University. Community Engagement in Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137441065_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics