Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Community Engagement in Higher Education ((CEHE))

Abstract

On-line service-learning has the potential to disrupt the dynamics of partnership building by shifting who names community from faculty/staff to students. Viewing this disruption not as detrimental but as a doorway through which students can engage with and learn in their own places, where they may have a strong sense of community, we explore the little word “of,” as an alternative to “for” and a complement to “with” in characterizing such service-learning partnerships. Such a shift opens possibilities for students’ democratic engagement as they are encouraged to partner and serve in their place(s) rather than only in ours.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bonner, A., & Tolhurst, G. (2002). Insider-outsider perspectives of participant observation. Nurse Researcher, 9(4), 7–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breen, L. J. (2007). The researcher “in the middle”: negotiating the insider/outsider dichotomy. The Australian Community Psychologist, 19(1), 163–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bringle, R. G., & Clayton, P. H. (2013). Conceptual frameworks for partnerships in service learning: implications for research. In P. H. Clayton, R. G. Bringle, & J. A. Hatcher (Eds), Research on service learning: conceptual frameworks and assessment (pp. 539–471). Sterling, VA: Stylus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, E. (1997). The fate of place: a philosophical history. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chavis, D. M., Hogge, J., McMillan, D., & Wandersman, A. (1986). Sense of community through Brunswick’s lens: a first look. Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 24–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, P. H. (2010). The power of little words. Raleigh, NC: Author. Accessed at www.curricularengagement.com/bio/bio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, P. H., & Ash, S. L. (2004). Shifts in perspective: capitalizing on the counter-normative nature of service-learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 11(1), 59–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colombo, M., & Senatore, A. (2005). The discursive construction of community identity. Journal of Community& Applied Psychology, 15, 48–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dostilio, L. D. (2012). Democratically engaged community-university partnerships: reciprocal determinants of democratically oriented roles and processes (doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3502569).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dostilio, L., Brackmann, S., Edwards, K., Harrison, B., Kliewer, B. K., & Clayton, P. H. (2013). Reciprocity: saying what we mean and meaning what we say. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 19(1), 17–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (1996). Afterword. In S. Feld & K. Basso (Eds), Sense of place (pp. 259–262). Sante Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruenewald, D. (2003). Foundations of place: a multidisciplinary framework for place-conscious education. American Educational Research Journal, 40(3), 619–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, J. (1998). Academic service learning: a counter normative pedagogy. New Directions in Teaching and Learning, 1998(73), 21–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, B. (2013). Student partnerships in service learning: conceptual frameworks and research. In P. H. Clayton, R. G. Bringle, & J. A. Hatcher (Eds.), Research on service learning: conceptual frameworks and assessment (pp. 599–618). Sterling, VA: Stylus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazoué, J. G. (2012). The deconstructed campus. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 24(2), 74–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, T. D., & Donahue, D. M. (2009). “I do more service in this class than I ever do at my site”: playing attention to the reflections of students of color in service-learning. In J. R. Strait & M. Lima (Eds), The future of service-learning: new solutions for sustaining and improving practice (pp. 172–191). Sterling, VA: Stylus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saltmarsh, J., Hartley, M., & Clayton, P. H. (2009) Democratic engagement white paper. Boston, MA: New England Resource Center for Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, D. (2004). Place-based education: connecting classrooms and communities. Barrington, MA: Orion Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tryon, E., Stoecker, R., Martin, A., Seblonka, K., Hilgendorf, A., & Nellis, M. (2008). The challenges of short-term service-learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 14(2), 16–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zlotkowski, E., Longo, N. V., & Williams, J. R. (Eds). (2006). Students as colleagues: expanding the circle of service-learning leadership. Providence, RI: Campus Compact.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Faith Beyer Hansen and Patti H. Clayton

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hansen, F.B., Clayton, P.H. (2014). From for to of: Online Service-Learning as Both Disruption and Doorway to Democratic Partnerships. In: Crabill, S.L., Butin, D. (eds) Community Engagement 2.0?: Dialogues on the Future of the Civic in the Disrupted University. Community Engagement in Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137441065_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics