Skip to main content

Does Terror Cause Torture? A Comparative Study of International Public Opinion about Governmental Use of Coercion

  • Chapter
Examining Torture

Abstract

Torture is perhaps best understood as a collection of practices designed to inflict suffering upon helpless subjects. It can include both physical and psychological pain, and, while torture has been conducted by private actors, our concern here is regarding torture authorized and carried out by governments. We examined two broad theories that have been put forth to explain public support for torture. First, torture has been understood as a practice that advanced societies should reject (whether they actually do so is another question), and thus part of the collection of post-materialistic values that characterize public attitudes in advanced liberal democracies. We label this explanation the “developmental hypothesis” of support for torture. Second, scholars such as Karen Greenberg and Stephen Holmes have posited that societies are driven to support torture when terrorism threatens them. In this study, we call this the “threat hypothesis” of support for torture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramson, Paul R., and Ronald Inglehart. 1995. Value Change in a Global Perspective. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almond, Gabriel. 1950. The American People and Foreign Policy. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asad, Talal. 1996. “On Torture, or Cruel, Inhuman, and Degrading Treatment.” Social Research 63 (4): 1081–1109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayard, Louis. 2008. “Answering Terror with Terror.” Salon.com, July 15. http://www.salon.com/2008/07/15/jane_mayer/

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakeley, Ruth. 2007. “Why Torture?” Review of International Studies 33 (3): 373–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, Courtenay Ryals, and Will H. Moore. 2010. “What Stops the Torture?” American Journal of Political Science 54 (2): 459–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, Christian, and David A. Armstrong II. 2004. “Democracy and the Violation of Human Rights: A Statistical Analysis from 1976 to 1996.” American Journal of Political Science 48 (3): 538–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flavin, Patrick, and David Nickerson. 2009. “Reciprocity and Public Opinion on Torture.” Unpublished manuscript, Accessed November 12, 2013. http://files.campus.edublogs.org/blogs.baylor.edu/dist/2/1297/files/2010/09/Torture_Reciprocity-2bdmo3i.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garson, G. David. 2012. “Fundamentals of Hierarchical Linear and Multilevel Modeling.” In Hierarchical Linear Modeling: Guide and Applications, ed. G. David Garson. Washington, DC: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, Karen J. 2006. “Introduction: The Rule of Law Finds Its Golem: Judicial Torture, Then and Now.” In The Torture Debate in America, ed. Karen Greenberg, 162–182. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gronke, Paul, Darius Rejali, Dustin Drenguis, James Hicks, Peter Miller, and Bryan Nakayama. 2010. “U.S. Public Opinion on Torture, 2001–2009.” PS: Political Science & Politics 43: 437–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, Stephen. 2006. “Is Defiance of Law a Proof of Success? Magical Thinking in the War on Terror.” In The Torture Debate in America, ed. Karen Greenberg, 118–135. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holsti, Ole R. 1992. “Public Opinion and Foreign Policy: Challenges to the Almond-Lippmann Consensus.” International Studies Quarterly 36: 439–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holsti, Ole R. 2004. Public Opinion and American Foreign Policy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooks, Gregory, and Clayton Mosher. 2005. “Outrages against Personal Dignity: Rationalizing Abuse and Torture in the War on Terror.” Social Forces 83 (4): 1627–1645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, Ronald. 1997. Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kull, Steven, Clay Ramsay, Stephen Weber, Evan Lewis, Melinda Brouwer, Melanie Ciolek, and Abe Medoff. 2008. “World Opinion on Torture.” Accessed November 12, 2013. http://www.worldpublicopinion.org/pipa/pdf/jun08/WPO_Torture_Jun08_packet.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, Peter. 2006. “An Eye for an Eye: Public Support for War against Evildoers.” International Organization 60 (3): 687–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, Jeremy D., and David J. Armor. 2012. “Support for Torture Over Time: Interrogating the American Public about Coercive Tactics.” Social Science Journal. 49 (4): 439–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, Andrew C. 2006. “Torture: Thinking about the Unthinkable.” In The Torture Debate in America, ed. Karen Greenberg, 98–110. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCoy, Alfred W. 2006. A Question of Torture: CIA Interrogation, from the Cold War to the War on Terror. New York: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Peter. 2011. “Torture Approval in Comparative Perspective.” Human Rights Review 12 (4): 441–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (START). (2012). Global Terrorism Database (Data file). Accessed November 12, 2013. http://www.start.umd.edu/gtd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, Benjamin I., and Robert Y. Shapiro. 1992. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in American Policy Preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Poe, Steven, C. Tate, and Linda Keith. 1999. “Repression of the Human Right to Personal Integrity Revisited: A Global Cross-National Study Covering the Years 1976–1993.” International Studies Quarterly 43 (2): 291–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, Robert Y., and Harpreet Mahajan. 1986. “Gender Differences in Policy Preferences: A Summary of Trends from the 1960s to the 1980s.” Public Opinion Quarterly 50 (Spring): 42–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shklar, Judith N. 1984. Ordinary vices. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shue, Henry. 1978. “Torture.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 7 (2): 124–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skolnick, Jerome. 2004 “American Interrogation: From Torture To Trickery.” In Torture: A Collection, ed. Sanford Levinson, 105–127. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wemlinger, Elizabeth. 2013. “The Gender Gap and Torture: Opposition to Torture among Men and Women in the USA.” Social Science Journal 51 (1): 113–119. Accessed July 28, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2013.06.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, Clyde, Lara Hewitt, and Dee Allsop. 1996. “The Gender Gap in Attitudes toward the Gulf War? A Cross National Perspective.” Journal of Peace Research 33: 67–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Tracy Lightcap and James P. Pfiffner

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mayer, J.D., Koizumi, N., Malik, A.A. (2014). Does Terror Cause Torture? A Comparative Study of International Public Opinion about Governmental Use of Coercion. In: Lightcap, T., Pfiffner, J.P. (eds) Examining Torture. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137439161_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics