Skip to main content

Evolution of Non-Technical Standards: The Case of Fair Trade

  • Chapter
Materiality and Time

Part of the book series: Technology, Work and Globalization ((TWG))

  • 193 Accesses

Abstract

Standards are everywhere. Distinct social spheres such as agriculture, education, medicine, and sports have become the subject of standardization. Corresponding standards have evolved without the enforcement of the hierarchical authority of states, and they “help regulate and calibrate social life by rendering the modern world equivalent across cultures, time, and geography” (Timmermans & Epstein, 2010, 70). In this context, Loya and Boli (1999) highlight that global and private standardizers homogenize the technical base of the world to facilitate unrestricted exchange. As a consequence, a multitude of technical standards is the basis for organizational practices and their coordination. Nonetheless, standardization is not only about technical compatibility and interoperability: some standards are used to differentiate by making largely particular claims (Busch, 2011). Nontechnical standards are often designed to make a difference. Well-known examples include sustainability programmes, such as Organic Fair Trade1 or the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC), that aim to offer alternatives to the conventional array of products. In contrast to the usual prevalence of one technical standard, multiple nontechnical standards often coexist (Reinecke et al., 2012) and can easily be challenged by competitors (Leveque, 1995).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahrne, G., Brunsson, N., & Garsten, C. (2000). Standardizing through organization. In N. Brunsson, & B. Jacobsson (eds) A World of Standards, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 50–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aravind, D., & Christmann, P. (2011). Decoupling of standard implementation from certification. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21, 73–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, N., & Hasse, R. (2012). The Escalation of Governance: Standards in the Fair Trade Sector. Unpublished paper presented at the 28th EGOS Colloquium, 5–7 July 2012, Helsinki, Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartley, T. (2007). Institutional emergence in an era of globalization: the rise of transnational private regulation of labor and environmental conditions. American Journal of Sociology, 113, 297–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becchetti, L., & Huybrechts, B. (2008). The dynamics of fair trade as a mixed-form market. Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 733–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, N., & Walgenbach, P. (2005). Technical efficiency or adaptation to institutionalized expectations? the adoption of ISO 9000 standards in the German mechanical engineering industry? Organization Science, 26, 841–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boiral, O. (2007). Corporate greening through ISO 14001: a rational myth?”. Organization Science, 18, 127–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boström, M. (2006). Regulatory credibility and authority through inclusiveness: standardization organizations in cases of eco-labelling. Organization, 13, 345–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, P. (2014). Comparing Minority and Human Rights Discourse in Social Science Textbooks: Cross-National Patterns, 1970–2008. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 39(1), 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brousseau, É., & Bessy, C. (1997). Brevet, Protection Et Diffusion Des Connaissances: Une Relecture Néo-Institutionnelle Des Propriétés De La Règle De Droit. Revue d”économie industrielle, 79, 233–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunsson, N., & Jacobsson, B. (2000). A World of Standards. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunsson, N., Rasche, A., & Seidl, D. (2012). The dynamics of standardization: three perspectives on standards in organization studies. Organization Studies, 33, 613–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busch, L. (2011). Standards: Recipes for Reality, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christmann, P., & Taylor, G. (2006). Firm self-regulation through international certifiable standards: determinants of symbolic versus substantive implementation. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 863–878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, P., & Rowlinson, M. (2004). The treatment of history in organisation studies: towards an “historic turn”? Business History, 46, 331–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conroy, M. E. (2007). Branded! How the Certification Revolution is Transforming Global Corporations. Gabriola Island, B.C.: New Society Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Djelic, M.-L., & Sahlin-Andersson, K. (2006). Transnational Governance: Institutional Dynamics of Regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • FLO-Cert (2013). ISO 65 Accreditation. Accessed at http://www.flo-cert.net/flo-cert/40. html on 6 May 2013.

  • Fransen, L. (2012). Multi-stakeholder governance and voluntary programme interactions: legitimation politics in the institutional design of corporate social responsibility. Socio-Economic Review, 10, 163–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fridell, G. (2004). The fair trade network in historical perspective. Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d”études du développement, 25, 411–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giovannucci, D., & Ponte, S. (2005). Standards as a new form of social contract? Sustainability initiatives in the coffee industry. Food Policy, 30, 284–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hafner-Burton, E. M., & Tsutsui, K. (2005). Human rights in a globalizing world: the paradox of empty promises. American Journal of Sociology, 110, 1373–1411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallström, K. T., & Boström, M. (2010). Transnational Multi-Stakeholder Standardization: Organizing Fragile Non-State Authority. Cheltenham, UK/Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hanseth, O., & Monteiro, E. (1997). Inscribing behaviour in information infrastructure standards. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, 7, 183–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatanaka, M., & Busch, L. (2008). Third-party certification in the global agrifood system: an objective or socially mediated governance mechanism? Sociologia Ruralis, 48, 73–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISEAL Alliance (2013). Impacts Code. Accessed at http://www.isealalliance.org/our-work/defining-credibility/codes-of-good-practice/impacts-code on 8 November 2012.

  • ISO/IEC (2004). Standardization and Related Activities - General Vocabulary. ISO/IEC Guide 2:2004 (E/F/R). Accessed at http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_iec_guide_2_2004.pdf on 8 July 2013.

  • Jacobsson, B. (2000). Standardization and expert knowledge. In N. Brunsson, & B. Jacobsson (eds) A World of Standards, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 40–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kott, S., & Droux, J. (2013). Globalizing Social Rights: The International Labour Organization and Beyond. Houndmills, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lengwiler, M. (2009). Double standards: the history of standardizing humans in modern life insurance. In M. Lampland, & S. L. Star (eds) Standards and Their Stories: How Quantifying, Classifying, and Formalizing Practices Shape Everyday Life, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 95–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonardi, P. M. (2012). Materiality, sociomateriality, and socio-technical systems: what do these terms mean? how are they different? In P. M. Leonardi, B. A. Nardi, & J. Kallinikos (eds) Materiality and Organizing: Social Interaction in a Technological World, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 25–48.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Leveque, F. (1995). Standards and standards-setting processes in the field of the environment. In R. W. Hawkins, R. Mansell, & J. Skea (eds) Standards, Innovation and Competitivness. The Politics and Economics of Standards in Natural and Technical Environments, Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 105–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loya, T. A., & Boli, J. (1999). Standardization in the world polity: technical rationality over power. In J. Boli, & G. M. Thomas (eds) Constructing World Culture: International Nongovernmental Organizations since 1875, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 169–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: tormal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohan, S. (2010). Fair Trade without the Froth. A Dispassionate Economic Analysis of “Fair Trade”. London: The Institute of Economic Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, C., & Yates, J. (2009). ISO, the International Organization for Standardization: Global Governance Through Voluntary Consensus. Abingdon, Oxon/New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, V., & Pound, B. (2009). The Last Ten Years: a Comprehensive Review of the Literature on the Impact of Fairtrade. London, University of Greenwich: Natural Resources Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28, 1435–1448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W. J. (2010). The sociomateriality of organisational life: considering tech-nology in management research. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34, 125–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raynolds, L. T. (2009). Mainstreaming fair trade coffee: from partnership to traceability. World Development, 37, 1083–1093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raynolds, L. T., & Long, M. A. (2007). Fair/alternative trade: historical and empirical dimensions. In L. T. Raynolds, D. Murray, & J. Wilkinson (eds) Fair Trade: The Challenges of Transforming Globalization, London/New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 15–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinecke, J., Manning, S., & von Hagen, O. (2012). The emergence of a standards market: multiplicity of sustainability standards in the global coffee industry. Organization Studies, 33, 791–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renard, M.-C., & Pérez-Grovas, V. (2007). Fair trade in Mexico: at the Center of the debates. In L. T. Raynolds, D. L. Murray, & J. Wilkinson (eds) Fair Trade: The Challenges of Transforming Globalization, London/New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 138–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruben, R. (2008). The Impact of Fair Trade. Wageningen, Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandholtz, K. W. (2012). Making standards stick: a theory of coupled vs. decoupled compliance. Organization Studies, 33, 655–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Star, S. L. (1999). The ethnography of infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist, 43, 377–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Star, S. L., & Lampland, M. (2009). Reckoning with standards. In M. Lampland, & S. L. Star (eds) Standards and Their Stories: How Quantifying, Classifying, and Formalizing Practices Shape Everyday Life, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tassey, G. (1995). The roles of standards as technology infrastructure. In R. W. Hawkins, R. Mansell, & J. Skea (eds) Standards, Innovation and Competitivness. The Politics and Economics of Standards in Natural and Technical Environments, Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 161–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmermans, S., & Epstein, S. (2010). A world of standards but not a standard world: toward a sociology of standards and standardization. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 69–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valkila, J., & Nygren, A. (2010). Impacts of fair trade certification on coffee farmers, cooperatives, and laborers in Nicaragua. Agriculture and Human Values, 27, 321–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vilnai-Yavetz, I., & Rafaeli, A. (2006). Managing artifacts to avoid artifact myopia. In M. G. Pratt, & A. Rafaeli (eds) Artifacts and Organizations: Beyond Mere Symbolism, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 9–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • WFTO, FLO, FLO-Cert (2011). Fair Trade Glossary. Accessed at http://www.fairtrade.net/fileadmnin/user_upload/content/2009/about_fairtrade/2011–06-28_fair-trade-glossary_WFTO-FLO-FLOCERT.pdf on 3 November 2012.

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Nadine Arnold

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Arnold, N. (2014). Evolution of Non-Technical Standards: The Case of Fair Trade. In: de Vaujany, FX., Mitev, N., Laniray, P., Vaast, E. (eds) Materiality and Time. Technology, Work and Globalization. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137432124_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics