Abstract
Since the advent of the information society, the modalities of reading and writing have changed. The issue of reading and writing, which has been a crucial ingredient of European self-consciousness since the development of vocalized alphabetical writing in the eighth century BCE, has emerged afresh, bringing new questions, paradoxes and opportunities. At first glance, one is struck by the uneven development of reading and writing in the digital environment. Apart from the technique of speed-reading, no technology has been implemented that supports or transforms the process of reading while, by contrast, writing has made enormous gains from the use of the personal computer. The computer has automated, speeded up and thus facilitated writing (Fortunati, 2005). As Fortunati and Vincent show (2014), electronic writing has been enhanced by many affordances,1 such as the automatic correction of errors of spelling, grammar and syntax, the use of online dictionaries, vocabularies, and so on. Composing texts electronically has also aided the process of editing, with other software devices, although there has been the loss of the ‘writing path’, as the technology has made it possible for writers not to keep track of their successive drafts, for good or ill. By contrast, and paradoxically, the use of the computer, which has facilitated writing so much, has made reading more difficult: what has emerged in the research carried out thus far is that people prefer to read on paper because it is less tiring (Dillon, 1992, 2011 and Baron, 2013).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Works cited
Baron, Naomi S. (2008) Always On: Language in an Online and Mobile World (New York: Oxford University Press).
Baron, Naomi S. (2013) ‘Reading in print versus onscreen: Better, worse, or about the same’, in Deborah Tannen and Anna Marie Trester (eds.) Discourse 2.0: Language and New Media (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press), 201–24.
Barthes, Roland (1964 [1960]) ‘Écrivains et écrivants’, Essais Critiques (orig. Arguments) (Paris: Seuil), 152–9.
Bredl, Klaus, Julia Hünninger and Jakob Linaa Jensen (eds.) (2014) Methods for Analyzing Social Media (New York: Routledge).
Bruns, Axel (2008) Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and Beyond: From Production to Produsage (New York: Peter Lang).
Carpentier, Nico, Kim Christian Schrøder and Lawtie Hallett (eds.) (2014) Audience Transformations. Shifting Audience Positions in Late Modernity (New York: Routledge).
Cull, Barry W. (2011) ‘Reading revolutions: Online digital text and implications for reading in academe’, First Monday, 16 (6): http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3340/2985
Dillon, Andrew (1992) ‘Reading from paper versus screens: A critical review of the empirical literature’, Ergonomics, 35 (10), 1297–1326.
Dourish, Paul (2004) Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
Fortunati, Leopoldina (2005) ‘Information processes and the knowledge society’, proceedings of international conference UNESCO between Two Phases of the World Summit on the Information Society (Moscow: Krasnyi Proletarji Printing-House), 112–22.
Fortunati, Leopoldina and Jane Vincent (2014) ‘Sociological insights on the cornparison of writing/reading on paper with writing/reading digitally’, Telematics and Informatics, 31 (1), 39–51.
Gibson, James J. (1986 [1979]) The Ecological Approach to Perception (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaurn Associates).
Griswold, Wendy (2008) Regionalism and the Reading Class (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
Hillesund, Terje (2010) ‘Digital reading spaces: How expert readers handle books, the web and electronic paper’, First Monday, 16 (4): www.firstmonday.org (accessed 30 December 2013).
Hutchby, Ian (2001) Conversation and Technology: From the Telephone to the Internet (Cambridge, MA: Polity).
Manovich, Lev (2001) The Language of New Media (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
Patriarche, Geoffroy, Helena Bilandzic, Jakob Linaa Jensen and Jelena Jurišić (eds.) (2014) Audience Research Methodologies. Between Innovation and Consolidation (New York: Routledge).
Purcell, Kristen, Judy Buchanan and Linda Friedrich (2013) The Impact of Digital Tools on Student Writing and How Writing Is Taught in Schools: http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Teachers-technology-and-writing (accessed 22 December 2013).
Rosen, Larry D., Jennifer Chang, Lynne Erwin, Mark L. Carrier and Nancy A. Cheever (2010) ‘The relationship between “textisms” and formal and informal writing among young adults’, Communication Research, 37 (3), 420–40.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Leopoldina Fortunati
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fortunati, L. (2014). Electronic Textuality: Introduction. In: Segal, N., Koleva, D. (eds) From Literature to Cultural Literacy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137429704_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137429704_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-49191-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-42970-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Media & Culture CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)